Deep democracy, thin citizenship: The impact of digital media in political campaign strategy

Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Volumn 597, Issue , 2005, Pages 153-170

  Howard, Philip N ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON   (United States)

Author keywords

Campaign strategy; Data mining; Information technology; Internet; Political communication

Indexed keywords

EID: 11144281248     PISSN: 00027162     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/0002716204270139     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Anderson, B. 1991. Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. London: Verso.
2. Calhoun, C. 1998. Community without propinquity revisited: Communications technology and the transformation of the urban public sphere. Sociological Inquiry 68 (3): 373-97.
3. Foucault, M. 1977. Discipline and punish: The birth of the prison. New York: Pantheon.
4. _. 1999. Power as knowledge. In Social theory, the multicultural and classic readings, ed. C. Lemert, 475-81. Boulder, CO: Westview.
5. Giddens, A. 1987. Social theory and modern sociology. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
6. Habermas, J. 1991. The structural transformation of the public sphere. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Hargittai, E. 2003. Serving citizens' needs: Minimizing online hurdles to accessing government information. IT & Society 1(3): 27-41.
8. Howard, P. N. 2005. Politics in code: Franchise and representation in the age of new media. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
9. Howard, P. N., and T. J. Milstein 2003. Spiders, spam, and spyware: New media and the market for political information. In Internet Studies 1.0, ed. M. Consalvo. New York: Peter Lang.
10. Introna, L., and H. Nissenbum. 2000. Shaping the Web: Why the politics of search engines matters. The Information Society 16 (3): 1-17.
11. Jagoda, K. 2000. E-voter study 2000: Measuring the effectiveness of the Internet in election 2000. Washington, DC: E-Voter Institute.
12. Katz, E. 1992. On parenting a paradigm: Gabriel Tarde's agenda for opinion and communication research. International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4:80-85.
13. Lazarsfeld, P. F., and R. K. Merton. 1948. Mass-communication, populartaste, and organized social action. In The communication of ideas, ed. L. Bryson, 95-118. New York: Harper & Brothers.
14. Poster, M. 1990. The mode of information. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
15. _. 1995. The second media age. Cambridge, UK: Polity.
16. Scott, J. C. 1998. Seeing like a state: How certain schemes to improve the human condition have failed. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Stromer-Galley, J. 2000. Online interaction and why candidates avoid it. Journal of Communication 50 (4): 111-32.
18. Sunstein, C. R. 2001. Republic.com. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
19. Tarde, G. 1898. Opinion and conversation. L'opinion Et La Foule. Paris: Alcan.
20. Webster, F. 1995. Theories of the information society. London: Routledge.
21. Witte, J., and P. N. Howard 2002. The future of polling: Relational inference and the development of Internet survey instruments. In Navigating public opinion: Polls, policy and the future of American democracy, ed. J. Manza, F. L. Cook, and B. I. Page, 272-89. New York: Oxford University Press.