Reading comprehension exercises online: The effects of feedback, proficiency and interaction

Language Learning and Technology

Volumn 11, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 107-129

  Murphy, Philip ^a  

^a KANDA UNIVERSITY OF INTERNATIONAL STUDIES   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 35449008074     PISSN: None     EISSN: 10943501     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61(2), 213-238.
2. Beatty, K. (2003). Teaching and researching computer-assisted language learning. London: Longman.
3. Beatty, K., & Nunan, D. (2004). Computer-mediated collaborative learning. System, 32, 165-183.
4. Benson, P. (2001). Teaching and researching autonomy in language learning. London: Longman.
5. Berry, L. H. (2000). Cognitive effects of web page design. In B. Abbey (Ed.), Instructional and cognitive impacts of Web-based education (pp. 41-55). London: Idea Group Publishing.
6. Bonk, W. J., & Ockey, G. (2003). A many-faceted Rasch analysis of the L2 group oral discussion task. Language Testing, 20(1), 89-110.
7. Brandi, K. K. (1995). Strong and weak students' preferences for error feedback options and responses. The Modern Language Journal, 79(2), 194-211.
8. Brandi, K. K. (2002). Integrating internet-based reading materials into the foreign language curriculum: from teacher- to student-centered approaches. Language Learning & Technology, 6(3), 87-107.
9. Caverly, D., & McConald, L. (1998). Techtalk: Distance development education. Journal of Developmental Education, 21(3), 36-37, 40.
10. Chapelle, C. (1997). CALL in the year 2000: Still in search of research paradigms. Language Learning & Technology, 1(1), 19-43.
11. Chapelle, C. A. (2001). Computer applications in second language acquisition: Foundations for teaching, testing and research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (1996). Facilitating reading comprehension with multimedia. System, 24, 503-519.
13. Chun, D. M., & Plass, J. L. (2000). Networked multimedia environments for second language acquisition. In M. Warschauer and R. Kern (Eds.), Network-based language teaching: Concepts and practice (pp. 151-170). New York: Cambridge University Press.
14. Clariana, R. B. (1993). A review of multiple-try feedback in traditional and computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20(3), 67-74.
15. Clariana, R. B. (2000). Feedback in computer-assisted learning. NETg University of Limerick Lecture Series. Retrieved September 28, 2007, from http://www.personal.psu.edu/faculty/r/b/rbc4/NETg.htm.
16. Clariana, R. B. (2003). The effectiveness of constructed-response and multiple-choice study tasks in computer aided learning. J. Educational Computing Research, 28(4), 395-406.
17. Clariana, R. B., & Koul, R. (2005). Multiple-try feedback and higher-order learning outcomes. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(3), 239-245.
18. Clariana, R. B., & Koul, R. (2006). The effects of different forms of feedback on fuzzy and verbatim memory of science principles. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, 259-270.
19. Clariana, R. B., & Lee, D. (2001). The effects of recognition and recall study tasks with feedback in a computer-based vocabulary lesson. Educational Technology Research & Development, 49(3), 23-36.
20. Clariana, R. B., Wagner, D., & Murphy, L. C. R. (2000). Applying a connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research & Development, 48(3), 5-21.
21. Clark, K., & Dwyer, F. (1998). Effect of different types of computer-assisted feedback strategies on achievement and response confidence. International Journal of Instructional Media, 25(1, winter), 55-63.
22. de Bot, K. (1996). Review article the psycholinguistics of the output hypothesis. Language Learning, 46(3), 529-555.
23. Eldredge, J. L., & Butterfield, D. D. (1986). Alternatives to traditional reading instruction. Reading Teacher, 40, 32-37.
24. Ellis, R. (1998). Discourse control and the acquisition-rich classroom. In Renandya, W. A. & Jacob, G. (Eds.), Learners and Language Learning, 39, 145-71.
25. Ferris, R. D. (2003). Response to student writing: Implications from second language students. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
26. Fisher, E. (1992). Characteristics of children's talk at the computer and its relationship to the computer software. Language and Education, 7(2), 187-215.
27. Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading: Applied linguistics in action. Harlow, UK: Longman.
28. Hong, W. (1997). Multimedia computer-assisted reading in business Chinese. Foreign Language Annals, 30, 335-344.
29. Jones, H. J., & Wolf, P. J. (2001). Teaching a graduate content area reading course via the Internet: Confessions of an experienced neophyte. Reading Improvement, Spring 2001, 38(1), 2-9.
30. Koskinen, P. S., & Blum, I. H. (1986). Paired repeated reading: A classroom strategy for developing fluent reading. The Reading Teacher, 40, 70-75.
31. Krashen, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
32. Kulhavy, R. W., & Wager, W. (1993). Feedback in programmed instruction: Historical context and implications for practice. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp.3-20). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
33. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
34. Larsen-Freeman, D., & Long, M. (1991). An introduction to second language acquisition research. Essex: Longman.
35. Lightbown, P., & Spada, N. (1999). How languages are learned. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Long, M. (1981). Input, interaction and second language acquisition. Annals of the NY Academy of Sciences, 379, 259-278.
37. Long, M. H. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp.377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
38. Mercer, N. (1995). The guided construction of knowledge: Talk amongst teachers and learners. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
39. Mercer, N. (2004). Sociocultural discourse analysis: Analysing classroom talk as a social mode of thinking. Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1(2), 137-168.
40. Merrill, J. (1985). Levels of questioning and forms of feedback: Instructional factors in courseware design. A presentation at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association in Chicago, Illinois. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 266 766).
41. Merrill, J. (1987). Levels of questioning and forms of feedback: Instructional factors in course ware design. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14(1), 18-22.
42. Mikulecky, L. (1998). Diversity, discussion, and participation. Comparing web-based and campus-based adolescent literature classes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 42(2), 84-92.
43. Mory, E. H. (1994). Adaptive feedback in computer-based instruction: Effects of response certitude on performance, feedback-study time, and efficiency. J. Educational Computing Research, 11(3), 263-290.
44. Murphy, P. M. (2005). Interactivity, usability and flexibility in an online reading course. Studies in Linguistics and Language Education of the Research Institute of Language Studies and Language Education, Kanda University of International Studies, 16, 383-433.
45. Murphy, P. M., & Imrie, A. (2003). Implementing computers in a reading classroom. Studies in Linguistics and Language Education of the Research Institute of Language Studies and Language Education, Kanda University of International Studies, 14, 123-166.
46. Nagata, N. (1996). Computer vs. workshop instruction in second language acquisition. CALICO Journal, 14(1), 53-75.
47. Nes, S. L. (2003). Using paired reading to enhance the fluency skills of less-skilled readers. Reading Improvement, 40(4), 179-192.
48. Nielson, M. C. (1990). The impact of informational feedback and a second attempt at practice questions on concept learning in computer-aided instruction. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
49. Nunan, D. (1993). Introducing discourse analysis. London: Penguin.
50. Pica, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
51. Pica, T. (1996). Do second language learners need negotiation? International Review of Applied Linguistics, 34(1),1-19.
52. Pica, T., Young, R., & Doughty, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21(4), 737-758.
53. Pressey, S. L. (1926). A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores - and teaches. School and Society, 23, 373-376.
54. Sales, G. C. (1993). Adapted and adaptive feedback in technology-based instruction. In J. V. Dempsy & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 159-17'5). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.
55. Schimmel, B. J. (1983). A meta-analysis of feedback to learners in computerized and programmed instruction. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal, Canada. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 233 708).
56. Shanker, J. L., & Ekwall, E. E. (2003). Locating and correcting reading difficulties. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill Prentice Hall.
57. Smith, P. L. (1988). Toward a taxonomy of feedback: Content and scheduling. A paper presented at the Annual meeting of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, New Orleans, LA.
58. Spock, P. A. (1987). Feedback and confidence of response for a rule-learning task using computer-assisted instruction. (Doctoral dissertation, University of Texas, Austin). Dissertation Abstracts International, 48(5), 1109.
59. Stakhnevich, J. (2002). Reading on the web: Implications for ESL professionals. The Reading Matrix, 2(2).
60. Stevens, V. (1992). Humanism and CALL: A coming of age. In M. C. Pennington and V. Stevens (Eds.), Computers in applied linguistics: An international perspective (pp. 11-38). Clevedon, UK: Multilingual Matters.
61. Swain, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and "comprehensible output in its development. In S. M. Gass & C. G. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House Publishers.
62. Swain, M., & Lapkin, S. (1995). Problems in output and the cognitive processes they generate: A step towards second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 16, 371-391.
63. Tsutsui, M. (2004). Multimedia as a means to enhance feedback. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17(3-4), 377-402.
64. Van den Branden, K. (2000). Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? A study of multilingual primary school classes. Reading Research Quarterly, 35(3), 426-443.
65. Van der Linden, E. (1993). Does feedback enhance computer-assisted language learning? Computers & Education, 21, 61-65.
66. Van Lier, L. (1996). Interaction in the language curriculum: Awareness, autonomy & authenticity. Harlow, UK: Longman.
67. Wegerif, R., & Mercer, N. (1996). Computers and reasoning through talk in the classroom. Language and Education, 10(1), 47-65.
68. Wegerif, R., Mercer, N., & Dawes, L. (1998). Software design to support discussion in the primary curriculum. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 14, 199-211.
69. Williams, H. S., & Williams, P. N. (2000). Integrating reading and computers: an approach to improve ESL students reading skills. Reading Improvement, Fall 2000, 37(3), 98-100.