Does negotiation of meaning promote reading comprehension? a study of multilingual primary school classes

Reading Research Quarterly

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2000, Pages 426-443

  Van Den Branden, Kris ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0043189250     PISSN: 00340553     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1598/rrq.35.3.6     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. ALMASI, J. (1995). The nature of fourth graders' sociocognitive conflicts in peer-led and teacher-led discussions of literature. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 314-351.
2. ASTON, G. (1986). Trouble shooting in interaction with learners: The more the merrier? Applied Linguistics, 7, 128-143.
3. BLOOME, D., & GREEN, J.L. (1992). Educational contexts of literacy. In W.A. Grabe (Ed.), Annual review of applied linguistics (Vol. 12, pp. 49-70). New York: Cambridge University Press.
4. BROWN, A., & PALINCSAR, A. (1989). Guided, cooperative learning and individual knowledge acquisition. In L. Resnick (Ed.), Knowing, learning, and instruction: Essays in honor of Robert Glaser (pp. 393-451). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. BRUNER, J. (1978). The role of dialogue in language acquisition. In A. Sinclair, R.J. Jarvella, & J.M. Levelt (Eds.), The child's conception of language (pp. 241-256). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
6. DAY, R. (Ed.). (1986). Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
7. DERWING, T. (1996). Elaborative detail: Help or hindrance to the NNS listener? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 283-297.
8. EEDS, M., & WELLS, D. (1989). Grand conversations: An exploration of meaning construction in literature study groups. Research in the Teaching of English, 23, 4-29.
9. EHRLICH, S., AVERY, P., & YORIO, C. (1989). Discourse structure and the negotiation of comprehensible input. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 11, 397-414.
10. ELLIS, R. (1994). The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
11. ELLIS, R., TANAKA, Y., & YAMAZAKI, A. (1994). Classroom interaction, comprehension, and the acquisition of L2 word meanings. Language Learning, 44, 449-491.
12. FAERCH, C., & KASPER, G. (1986). The role of comprehension in second-language learning. Applied Linguistics, 7, 257-274.
13. GALLAWAY, C., & RICHARDS, B. (Eds.). (1994). Input and interaction in language acquisition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
14. GASS, S., & VARONIS, E. (1994). Input, interaction, and second language production. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 283-302.
15. GOLINKOFF, R. (1983). The preverbal negotiation of failed messages: Insights into the transition period. In R. Golinkoff (Ed.), The transition from prelinguistic to linguistic communication (pp. 57-78). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. HAWKINS, B. (1985). Is an "appropriate response" always so appropriate? In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 162-178). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
17. KRASHEN, S. (1985). The input hypothesis: Issues and implications. London: Longman.
18. KUHN, D. (1989). Children and adults as intuitive scientists. Psychological Review, 96, 674-689.
19. LONG, M. (1985). Input and second language acquisition theory. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.). Input in second language acquisition (pp. 377-393). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
20. LONG, M. (1987). Native speaker/nonnative speaker conversation in the second language classroom. In M. Long & J. Richards (Eds.), Methodology in TESOL: A book of readings (pp. 339-352). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
21. LOSCHKY, L. (1994). Comprehensible input and second language acquisition. What is the relationship? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 16, 303-323.
22. PARKER, K., & CHAUDRON, C. (1987). The effects of linguistic simplifications and elaborative modifications on L2 comprehension. University of Hawaii Working Papers in ESL, 6, 107-133.
23. PICA, T. (1994). Research on negotiation: What does it reveal about second-language learning conditions, processes and outcomes? Language Learning, 44, 493-527.
24. PICA, T., DOUGHTY, C., & YOUNG, R. (1986). Making input comprehensible: Do interactional modifications help? ITL Review of Applied Linguistics, 72, 1-25.
25. PICA, T., HOLLIDAY, L, LEWIS, N., BERDUCCI, D., & NEWMAN, J. (1991). Language learning through interaction. What role does gender play? Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 343-376.
26. PICA, T., YOUNG, R., & DOUGHTY, C. (1987). The impact of interaction on comprehension. TESOL Quarterly, 21, 737-758.
27. PINE, J. (1994). The language of primary caregivers. In C. Gallaway & B. Richards (Eds.), Input and interaction in language acquisition (pp. 15-37). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
28. REUTZEL, D.R., & HOLLINGSWORTH, P. (1988). Highlighting key vocabulary: A generative-reciprocal procedure for teaching selected inference types. Reading Research Quarterly, 23, 358-378.
29. SCARDAMALIA, M., & BEREITER, C. (1987). Knowledge telling and knowledge transforming in written composition. In S. Rosenberg (Ed.), Advances in applied psycholinguistics, volume 2: Reading, writing, and language learning (pp. 142-175). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
30. SWAIN, M. (1985). Communicative competence: Some roles of comprehensible input and comprehensible output in its development. In S. Gass & C. Madden (Eds.), Input in second language acquisition (pp. 235-253). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.
31. VAN DEN BRANDEN, K. (1997). Effects of negotiation on language learners' output. Language Learning, 47, 589-636.
32. VARONIS, E., & GASS, S. (1985). Nonnative/nonnative conversations: A model for negotiation of meaning. Applied Linguistics, 6, 71-90.
33. VYGOTSKY, L. (1978). Mind in society. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
34. WELLS, G. (1985). Language development in the pre-school years. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
35. WELLS, G. (1986). Variation in child language. In P. Fletcher & M. Garman (Eds.), Language acquisition: Studies in first language development (pp. 377-395). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
36. WHITE, L. (1987). Against comprehensible input: The input hypothesis and the development of second-language competence. Applied Linguistics, 8, 95-110.
37. YANO, Y., LONG, M., & ROSS, S. (1994). The effects of simplified and elaborated texts on foreign language reading comprehension. Language Learning, 44, 189-219.