The effects of different forms of feedback on fuzzy and verbatim memory of science principles

British Journal of Educational Psychology

Volumn 76, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 259-270

  Clariana, Roy B ^a,b   Koul, Ravinder ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ARTICLE; EDUCATION; EDUCATIONAL MODEL; FEEDBACK SYSTEM; FEMALE; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; METHODOLOGY; SCIENCE;

ADOLESCENT; FEEDBACK; FEMALE; FUZZY LOGIC; HUMANS; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, EDUCATIONAL; RESEARCH DESIGN; SCIENCE;

EID: 33745644470     PISSN: 00070998     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1348/000709905X39134     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Anderson, R. C. (1972). How to construct achievement tests to assess comprehension. Review of Educational Research, 42, 145-170.
2. Andre, T. (1979). Does answering higher-level questions while reading facilitate productive learning? Review of Educational Research, 49, 280-318.
3. Bangert-Drowns, R. L., Kulik, C. C., Kulik, J. A., & Morgan, M. (1991). The instructional effect of feedback in test-like events. Review of Educational Research, 61, 213-238.
4. Bormuth, J. R., Manning, J., Carr, J., & Pearson, D. (1970). Children's comprehension of between and within sentence syntactic structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 349-357.
5. Brainerd, C. J., & Reyna, V F. (1990). Fuzzy is the grist: Fuzzy-trace theory and the new intuitionism. Developmental Review, 10, 3-47.
6. Brainerd, C. J., Reyna, V. F., & Brandse, E. (1995). Are children's false memories more persistent than their true memories? Psychological Science, 6, 359-364.
7. Butler, D. L., & Winne, P. H. (1995). Feedback and self-regulated learning: A theoretical synthesis. Review of Educational Research, 65, 245-281.
8. Clariana, R. B. (1993). A review of multiple-try feedback in traditional and computer-based instruction. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 20, 67-74.
9. Clariana, R. B. (1999). CBT design: A feedback achievement treatment interaction. 21st annual proceedings of selected research presentations of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology, 22, 87-92
10. Clariana, R. B., & Koul, R. (2005). Multiple-try feedback and higher-order learning outcomes. International Journal of Instructional Media, 32(3), 239-245.
11. Clariana, R. B., Wagner, D., & Rohrer-Murphy, L. C. (2000). A connectionist description of feedback timing. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3), 5-21.
12. Duchastel, P. C. (1983). Improving adjunct question research: Processes and ecological validity. Human Learning, 2, 1-5.
13. Einstein, G. O., McDaniel, M. A., Bowers, C. A., & Stevens, D. T. (1984). Memory for prose: The influence of relational and proposition-specific processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 10, 133-143.
14. Gagné, R. M., Briggs, L. J., & Wager, W. W. (1992). Principles of instructional design. Philadelphia, PA: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
15. Grabowski, B. L. (1996). Generative learning: past, present, future. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook for educational communications and technology (pp. 897-901). New York, NY: Macmillan.
16. Hamaker, C. (1986). The effects of adjunct questions on prose learning. Review of Educational Research, 56, 212-242.
17. Kulhavy, R. W., & Stock, W. A. (1989). Feedback in written instruction: The place of response certitude. Educational Psychology Research, 1, 279-308.
18. Kulik, J. A., & Kulik, C. C. (1988). Timing of feedback and verbal learning. Review of Educational Research, 58, 79-97.
19. Lindner, R. W., & Rickards, J. P. (1985). Questions inserted in text: Issues and implications. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), The technology of text: Principles for structuring, designing, and displaying text (pp. 131-157). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
20. Morrison, G. M., Ross, S. M., Gopalakrishnan, M., & Casey, J. (1995). The effects of feedback and incentives on achievement in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 32-50.
21. Mory, E. H. (1994). The use of response certitude in adaptive feedback: Effects on student performance, feedback study time, and efficiency. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, 263-290.
22. Mory, E. H. (1996). Feedback research. In D. H. Jonassen (Ed.), Handbook of research for educational communications and technology (pp. 919-956). New York, NY: Macmillan.
23. Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., & Neuschatz, J. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 261-285.
24. Pridemore, D. R., & Klein, J. D. (1995). Control of practice and levels of feedback in computer-based instruction. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 20, 444-450.
25. Reyna, V. E, & Brainerd, C. J. (1995a). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 1-75.
26. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1995b). Fuzzy-trace theory: Some foundational issues. Learning and Individual Differences, 7, 145-162.
27. Reyna, V. F., & Brainerd, C. J. (1998). Fuzzy-trace theory and false memory: New frontiers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 71, 194-209.
28. Seamon, J. G., Luo, C. R., Schwartz, M. A., Jones, K.J., Lee, D. M., & Jones, S. J. (2002). Repetition can have similar or different effects on accurate and false recognition. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 323-340.
29. Smith, P. L., & Ragan, T. J. (1993). Designing instructional feedback for different learning outcomes. In J. V. Dempsey & G. C. Sales (Eds.), Interactive instruction and feedback (pp. 75-103). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology.
30. Strandburg, J. E (1969). Systems for use with paper-based instructional products (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED058150).