Resistance to L2 pragmatics in the Australian ESL context

Language Learning

Volumn 57, Issue 4, 2007, Pages 611-649

  Davis, John McE ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Attitude; Korean ESL learners; Pragmatics; Resistance; Routines; Study abroad

Indexed keywords

EID: 35448978429     PISSN: 00238333     EISSN: 14679922     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00430.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Aijmer, K. (1996). Conversational routines in English. London, New York : Longman.
2. Bardovi-Harlig, K., & Dornyei, Z. (1998). Do learners recognize pragmatic violations? Pragmatic versus grammatical awareness in instructed L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 32, 233 262.
3. Barron, A. (2002). Acquisition in interlanguage pragmatics: Learning how to do things with words in a study abroad context. Benjamins/Berlin: de Gruyter.
4. Blum-Kulka, S. (1991). Interlanguage pragmatics: The case of requests. In R. Phillipson, E. Kellerman, L. Selinker, M. Sharwood Smith, & M. Swain (Eds Foreign/second language pedagogy research (pp. 255 272). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
5. Bodman, J., & Eisenstein, M. (1988). May God increase your bounty: The expression of gratitude in English by native and nonnative speakers. Cross Currents, 151, 1 21.
6. Bouton, L. F. (1994). Can NNS skill in interpreting implications in American English be improved through explicit instruction? A pilot study. In L. F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds Pragmatics and language learning (monograph series vol. 5, pp. 88 109). Urbana-Champaign : Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois.
7. Canagarajah, S. (1993). Critical ethnography of a Sri Lankan classroom: ambiguities in student opposition to reproduction through ESOL. TESOL Quarterly, 27, 601 626.
8. Canagarajah, S. (1999). Resisting linguistic imperialism in English teaching. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
9. Chiba, R., Matsuura, H., & Yamamoto, A. (1995). Japanese attitudes toward English accents. World Englishes, 14, 77 86.
10. Clément, R., & Dörnyei, Z. (2001). Motivational characteristics of learning different target languages: Results of nationwide survey. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 399 432). Honolulu : Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
11. Cohen, A. (1997). Developing pragmatic ability: Insights from the accelerated study of Japanese. In H. M. Cook, K. Hijirida, & M. Tahara (Eds New trends and issues in teaching Japanese language and culture (pp. 135 159). Honolulu : Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
12. Coulmas, F. (1981). Conversational routine: Explorations in standardized communication situations and prepatterned speech. The Hague : Mouton Publishers.
13. Crookes, G., & Schmidt, R.W. (1991). Motivation: Reopening the research agenda. Language Learning, 41, 469 512.
14. Dahl, M., & Kasper, G. (1991). Research methods in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 13, 215 247.
15. Dalton-Puffer, C., Kaltenboeck, K., & Smit, U. (1997). Learner attitudes and L2 pronunciation in Austria. World Englishes, 16, 115 128.
16. DeCarrico, J. S., & Nattinger, J. R. (1992). Lexical phrases and language teaching. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
17. Dufon, M. (2000). The acquisition of negative responses to experience questions in Indonesian as a second language by sojourners in a naturalistic context. In B. Swierzban, F. Morris, M. E. Anderson, C. A. Klee, & E. Tarone (Eds Social and cognitive factors in second language acquisition (pp. 77 97). Sommerville, MA : Cascadilla Press.
18. Frota, S. N., & Schmidt, R. W. (1986). Developing basic conversational ability in a second language: A case study of an adult learner of Portuguese. In R. Day (Ed Talking to learn: Conversation in second language acquisition (pp. 237 322). Rowley, MA : Newbury House.
19. Gibb, M. (2000). Helping students to find their own voice. Modern English Teacher, 9, 15 17.
20. Golato, A. (2003). Studying compliment response: A comparison of DCT's and naturally occurring talk. Applied Linguistics, 24, 90 121.
21. Hakuta, K. (1974). Prefabricated patterns and the emergence of structure in second language acquisition. Language Learning, 26, 321 351.
22. Hinkel, E. (1996). When in Rome: Evaluations of L2 pragmalinguistic behaviors. Journal of Pragmatics, 26, 51 70.
23. Hinkel, E. (1997). Appropriateness of advice: DCT and multiple choice data. Applied Linguistics, 18, 1 26.
24. House, J. (1996). Developing pragmatic fluency in English as a foreign language. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 225 252.
25. Igarashi, K., & Kanagy, R. (1997). Acquisition of pragmatics competence in a Japanese immersion Kindergarten. In L.F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds Pragmatics and language learning (monograph series vol. 8, pp. 243 265). Urbana-Champaign : Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois.
26. Kachru, B. (1982). Models for non-native Englishes. In B. Kachru (Ed The other tongue: English across cultures. Urbana : University of Illinois Press.
27. Kanagy, R. (1999). Interactional routines as a mechanism for L2 acquisition and socialization in an immersion context. Journal of Pragmatics, 31, 1467 1492.
28. Kasper, G. (1995). Routine and indirection in interlanguage pragmatics. In L.F. Bouton & Y. Kachru (Eds Pragmatics and language learning (monograph series vol. 6, pp. 59 78). Urbana-Champaign : Division of English as an International Language, University of Illinois.
29. Kasper, G., & Schmidt, R. (1996). Developmental issues in interlanguage pragmatics. Studies in Second Language Acquisition, 18, 149 169.
30. Kasper, G., & Rose, K. (2001). Pragmatics in language teaching. New York : Cambridge University Press.
31. Kecskés, I. (1998). Situation-bound utterances from an interlanguage perspective. Selected papers from the 6th international pragmatics conference (vol. 2. pp. 299 309). Reims : France.
32. Kecskés, I. (2003). Situation-bound utterances in L1 and L2. Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
33. Kondo, S. (1997). The development of pragmatic competence by Japanese learners of English. Sophia Linguistica, 41, 265 284.
34. Kramsch, C. (2002). From practice to theory and back again. In M. Byram & P. Grundy (Eds Context and culture in language teaching and learning (pp. 4 17). Clevedon, UK : Multilingual Matters.
35. Krashen, S. D., & Scarcella, R. (1978). On routines and patterns in language acquisition and performance. Language Learning, 28, 283 300.
36. Kumaravadivelu, B. (2001). Towards a postmethod pedagogy. TESOL Quarterly, 35 (4 537 560.
37. Lantolf, J. P. (2000). Sociocultural theory and second language learning. Oxford : Oxford University Press.
38. LoCastro, V. (2001). Individual differences in second language acquisition: Attitudes, learner subjectivity, and pragmatic norms. System, 29, 69 89.
39. Marriott, H. (1995). The acquisition of politeness patterns by exchange students in Japan. In B. F. Freed (Ed Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 197 224). Philadelphia : Benjamins.
40. Norton, B. (1989). Toward a pedagogy of possibility in the teaching of English internationally. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 401 420.
41. Norton, B. (2000). Identity and language learning. Harlow, UK : Pearson.
42. Ohta, A. S. (1999). Interactional routines and the socialization of interactional style in adult learners of Japanese. Journal of Pragmatic, 31, 1493 1512.
43. Peirce, B. N. (1995). Social identity, investment, and language learning. TESOL Quarterly, 29, 9 31.
44. Pennycook, A. (1989). The concept of method, interested knowledge and the politics of language teaching. TESOL Quarterly, 23, 589 618.
45. Pennycook, A. (1994). The cultural politics of English as an international language. London : Longman.
46. Pennycook, A. (2001). Critical applied linguistics: A critical introduction. Mahwah, NJ : Erlbaum.
47. Rehbein, J. (1987). Multiple formulae: Aspects of Turkish migrant workers' German in intercultural communication. In K. Knapp, W. Enninger, & A. Knapp-Pothoff (Eds Analyzing intercultural communication (pp. 215 248). Berlin : Mouton de Gruyter.
48. Roever, C. (1996). Linguistische Routinen: Systematische, Psycholinguistische und Fremdssprachendidaktische Uberlegungen [Linguistic routines: Systematic, psycholinguistic, and pedagogical considerations Fremdsprachen und Hochschule, 46, 43 60.
49. Roever, C. (2003). A web-based test of interlanguage pragmalinguistic knowledge: Speech acts, routines, implicatures. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
50. Roever, C. (2004). Adaptation of a test of ESL pragmalinguistics from American English to Australian English. Paper presented at the University of Melbourne, 23 April 2004.
51. Schmidt, R. W. (1990). The role of consciousness in second language learning. Applied Linguistics, 11, 129 158.
52. Schmidt, R. W. (1993). Consciousness, learning and interlanguage pragmatics. In G. Kasper & S. Blum-Kulka (Eds Interlanguage pragmatics (pp. 21 42). New York : Oxford University Press.
53. Schmidt, R. W. (1995). Consciousness and foreign language learning: A tutorial on the role of attention and awareness in learning. In R. Schmidt (Ed Attention and awareness in foreign language learning (Tech. Rep. No. 9, pp. 1 63). Honolulu : University of Hawai'i, Second Language Teaching and Curriculum Center.
54. Schmidt, R. W. (2001). Attention. In P. Robinson (Ed Cognition and second language instruction (pp. 3 33). New York : Cambridge University Press.
55. Shim, R. J. (2002). Changing attitudes toward TEWOL in Korea. Journal of Asian Pacific Communication, 12, 143 158.
56. Siegal, M. (1995). Individual differences and study abroad: Women learning Japanese in Japan. In B. F. Freed (Ed Second language acquisition in a study abroad context (pp. 225 244). Philadelphia : Benjamins.
57. Siegal, M. (1996). The role of learner subjectivity in second language sociolinguistic competency: Western women learning Japanese. Applied Linguistics, 17, 356 382.
58. Simon, R. (1992). Teaching against the grain: Essays toward a pedagogy of possibility. London : Bergin & Garvey.
59. Syed, Z. (2001). Notions of self in foreign language learning: A qualitative analysis. In Z. Dörnyei & R. Schmidt (Eds Motivation and second language acquisition (pp. 127 147). Honolulu : Second Language Teaching & Curriculum Center, University of Hawai'i at Manoa.
60. Takahashi, S. (2000). The effects of motivation and proficiency on the awareness of pragmatic strategies in implicit foreign language learning. Unpublished manuscript (provided by Dr. Carsten Roever, Melbourne University).
61. Thomas, J. (1983). Cross-cultural pragmatic failure. Applied Linguistics, 4, 91 112.
62. Weinert, R. (1995). The role of formulaic language in second language acquisition: A review. Applied Linguistics, 16 (2 180 205.
63. Wray, A. (1999). Formulaic language in learners and native speakers. Language Teaching, 32 (1 213 231.
64. Wray, A. (2000). Formulaic sequences in second language teaching: Principles and practice. Applied Linguistics, 21 (4 463 489.
65. Wray, A. (2002). Formulaic language and the lexicon. Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.