Connectiveness and civility in online learning

Nurse Education in Practice

Volumn 7, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 425-432

  Rieck, Susan ^a   Crouch, Laura ^a  

^a NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Civility; Connectiveness; Online learning

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; EDUCATION; HEALTH PERSONNEL ATTITUDE; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; METHODOLOGY; NURSING EDUCATION; NURSING STUDENT; PUBLIC RELATIONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE OF HEALTH PERSONNEL; COMMUNICATION; EDUCATION, DISTANCE; EDUCATION, NURSING, BACCALAUREATE; FACULTY, NURSING; HUMANS; INTERPROFESSIONAL RELATIONS; NURSING EDUCATION RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; SOUTHWESTERN UNITED STATES; STUDENTS, NURSING;

EID: 35148841653     PISSN: 14715953     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.nepr.2007.06.006     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. AACN Issue Bulletin, 2000. Distance learning is changing and challenging nursing education. Retrieved July 10, 2006, from http://www.aacn.nche.edu/Publications/issues/jan2000.htm.
2. Ali N.S., Hodson-Carlton K., and Ryan M. Students' perceptions of online learning: implications for teaching. Nurse Educator 29 3 (2004) 111-115
3. Allen, I.E., Seaman, J., 2005. Growing by Degrees: Online Education in the United States, 2005. Sloan Consortium, Needham, MA.
4. American Psychological Association, 2006. Learner-centered psychological principles: a framework for school redesign and reform. Retrieved February 28, 2006, from http://www.apa.org/ed/lcp/html.
5. Chen K., and Yen D.C. Improving the quality of online presence through interactivity. Information and Management 42 (2004) 217-226
6. Chickering A.W., and Gamson Z.F. Seven principles of good practice in undergraduate education. AAHE Bulletin 39 7 (1987) 3-7
7. Diekelmann N., and Mendias E. Being a supportive presence in online courses: attending to students' online presence with each other. Journal of Nursing Education 44 9 (2005) 393-395
8. Diekelmann N., Schuster R., and Nosek C. Creating new pedagogies at the millennium: the common experiences of University of Wisconsin-Madison teachers using distance education technologies (1998), University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Nursing
9. Ferriss A.L. Studying and measuring civility: a framework, trends, and scale. Sociological Inquiry 72 3 (2002) 376-392
10. Frand J.L. The information-age mindset: changes in students and implications for higher education. Educause Review 35 5 (2000) 15-24
11. Gillis A., and Jackson W. Research for Nurses: Methods and Interpretation (2003), F.A. Davis, Philadelphia
12. Hodge, F.S., 2003. Connectiveness, health outcomes, and health-promoting behaviors among American Indians. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Public Health Association on Behavior, Lifestyle, and Social Determinants of Health, San Francisco, CA.
13. Institute for Higher Education Policy., 2000. Quality on the Line: Benchmarks for Success in Internet-Based Distance Education. Washington, D.C.: National Education Association.
14. Jones, S., 2002. The Internet Goes to College: How Students are Living in the Future with Today's Technology (PEW Internet & American Life Project Report). PEW, Washington, DC.
15. Kolanko K.M., Clark C., Heinrich K.T., Olive D., Serembus J.F., and Sifford S. Academic dishonesty, bullying, incivility, and violence: difficult challenges facing nurse educators. Nursing Education Perspectives 27 1 (2006) 34-43
16. Lagier J. Distance learning and the minority student: special needs and opportunities. The Internet and Higher Education 6 (2003) 179-184
17. Lashley F.R., and DeMeneses M. Student civility in nursing programs: a national survey. Journal of Professional Nursing 17 2 (2001) 81-86
18. Luparell S. Faculty encounters with uncivil nursing students: an overview. Journal of Professional Nursing 20 1 (2004) 59-67
19. Maor D. The teacher's role in developing interaction and reflection in an online learning community. Education Media International 40 1/2 (2003) 127-137
20. Michinov N., Michinov E., and Toczek-Capelle M.C. Social identity, group processes, and performance in synchronous computer-mediated communication. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research and Practice 8 1 (2004) 27-39
21. Morrissette P.J. Reducing incivility in the university/college classroom. International Electronic Journal for Leadership in Learning 5 4 (2001). http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll Retrieved March 9, 2006, from http://www.ucalgary.ca/~iejll
22. Pankoke-Babatz U., and Jeffrey P. Documented norms and conventions on the Internet. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction 14 2 (2002) 219-235
23. Salmon G. E-moderating: The Key to Teaching and Learning Online. second ed. (2003), Taylor & Francis Books, London
24. Skiba, D., Barton, A., 2006. Adapting your teaching to accommodate the NET generation of learners. OJIN: The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 11, Manuscript 4. Retrieved June 6, 2006, from http://nursingworld.org/ojin/topic30/tpc30_4.htm.
25. Wilhelm S., Rodehorst T.K., Young S., Jensen L., and Stepans M.B. Students' perspective of the effectiveness of an asynchronous on-line seminar. Journal of Professional Nursing 19 5 (2003) 313-319
26. Woods R., and Ebersol S. Using non-subject-matter-specific discussion boards to build connectedness in online learning. The American Journal of Distance Education 17 3 (2003) 99-112