Approaches to learning and study orchestrations in high school students

European Journal of Psychology of Education

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 131-151

  Cano, Francisco ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GRANADA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Academic performance; Approches to learning; Consonance and dissonance; Family intellectual climate; Study orchestrations

Indexed keywords

EID: 34848891471     PISSN: 02562928     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/BF03173518     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. American Psychological Association (2001). Publication Manual of the American Psychological Association (5th ed.), DC: Author.
2. Biggs, J. (1984). Learning strategies, student motivation patterns, and subjectively perceived success. In J.R. Kirby (Ed.), Cognitive and educational performance (pp. 111-134). New York: Academic Press.
3. Biggs, J. (1987). Learning Process Questionnaire. Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research.
4. Biggs, J. (1993). What do inventories of students' learning processes really measure? A theoretical review and clarification. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 63, 1-17.
5. Biggs, J.B. (2001). Enhancing learning: A matter of style or approach? In R.J. Sternberg & L.F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 73-102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
6. Biggs, J., Kember, D., & Leung (2001). The revised two-factor Study Process Questionnaire: R-SPQ-2F. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 71, 133-149.
7. Black, J.D. (1961). The D-48 Test. Preliminary manual. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.
8. Cano, F. (2005). Consonance and dissonance in students' learning experience. Learning and Instruction, 15, 201-223.
9. Cliff, A. (2000). Dissonance in first-year students' reflections on their learning. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 49-60.
10. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
11. Dart, B., Burnet, P., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., Smith, D., & McCrindle, A. (1999). Classroom learning environments and students' approaches to learning. Learning Environments Research, 2(2), 137-156.
12. Dart, B.C., Burnett, P.C., Purdie, N., Boulton-Lewis, G., Campbell, J., & Smith (2000). Students' conceptions of learning, the classroom environment, and approaches to learning. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(4), 262-270.
13. Diseth, A. (2002). The relationship between intelligence, approaches to learning and academic achievement. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 46(2), 219230.
14. Dixon, W.J. (Ed.). ( 1985). BMDP Statistical Software. Berkeley: University of California.
15. Entwistle, N.J. (1981). Styles of learning and teaching, 1. Educational Psychology. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
16. Entwistle, N.J. (1987). A model of the teaching-learning process derived from research on student learning. In J.T.E. Richardson, M.N. Eysenck, & D. Warren-Piper (Eds.), Student learning research in education and cognitive psychology (pp. 13-28). London: S.R.H.E and Open University Press.
17. Entwistle, N., & Ramsden, P. (1983). Understanding student learning. London: Croom Helm.
18. Entwistle, N.J., & Waterston, S. (1988). Approaches to studying and levels of processing in university students. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 58, 258-265.
19. Entwistle, N., Hanley, M., & Hounsell, D. (1979). Identifying distinctive approaches to studying. Higher Education, 8, 365-380.
20. Entwistle, N., McCune, V., & Walker, P. (2001). Conceptions, styles and approaches within higher education: analytic abstractions and everyday experience. In R.J. Sternberg & L.F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 103-136). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
21. Entwistle, N., Meyer, J.H.F., & Tait, H. (1991). Student failure: Disintegrated patterns of study strategies and perceptions of the learning environment. Higher Education, 21, 249-261.
22. Entwistle, N., Tait, H., & McCune, V. (2000). Patterns of response to an approaches to studying inventory across contrasting groups and contexts. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 33-48.
23. Feiner, R., Aber, M.S., Primavera, J., & Cauce, A.M. (1985). Adaptation and vulnerability in high-risk adolescents: An examination of environmental mediators. American Journal of Community Psychology, 13, 365-379.
24. Fraser, B.J. (1991). Two decades of classroom environment research, In B.J. Fraser & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences (pp. 3-27). New York: Pergamon.
25. Georgiou, S.N., & Christou, C. (2000). Family parameters of achievement: a structural equation model. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(3), 297-311.
26. Gough, H.G., & Domino, G. (1963). The D-48 as a measure of general ability among grade school children. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 27, 344-349.
27. Handel, A. (1973). The D-48 as a measure of general ability among adolescents in Israel. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 4(3), 302-313.
28. Herzberg, P.A. (1969). The parameters of cross-validation. Psychometrika Monograph Supplement, 16, 1-67.
29. Huebner, E., & McCullough, G. (2000). Correlates of school satisfaction among adolescents. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(5), 331-335.
30. Kember, D., & Leung, D.Y. (1998). The dimensionality of approaches to learning: an investigation with confirmatory factor analysis on the structure of the SPQ and LPQ. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 68, 395-407.
31. Kember, D., Wong, A., & Leung, D.Y.P. (1999). Reconsidering the dimensions of approaches to learning. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 69, 323-343.
32. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2003). Broadening an understanding of the phenomenon of dissonance. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 63-77.
33. Lindblom-Ylänne, S. (2004). Raising students' awareness of their approaches to study. Innovations in Education and teaching international, 41(4), 405-421.
34. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Lonka, K. (1999). Individuals ways of interacting with the learning environment - Are they related to study success? Learning and Instruction, 9(1), 1-18.
35. Lindblom-Ylänne, S., & Lonka, K. (2000). Dissonant study orchestrations of high-achieving university students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 19-32.
36. Long, W.F. (2003). Dissonance detected by cluster analysis of responses to the Approaches and Study Skills Inventory for students. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 21-35.
37. Marjoribanks, K. (1977). Affective and environmental correlates of cognitive performance. The Journal of Educational Research, 71, 3-8,
38. Marjoribanks, K. (1979). Families and their learning environments: An empirical analysis. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
39. Marjoribanks, K. (2005). Family environments and children's outcomes. Educational Psychology, 25(6), 647-657.
40. Martinez-Pons, M. (1996). Test of a model of parental inducement of academic self-regulation. The Journal of Experimental Education, 64(3), 213-227.
41. Marlon, F. (1981). Phenomenography - Describing conceptions of the world around us. Instructional Science, 10, 177-200.
42. Marion, F., & Säljö, R. (1976a). On qualitative differences in learning. I - Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 4-11.
43. Marton, F., & Säljö, R. (1976b). On qualitative differences in learning. II - Outcome as a function of the learner's conception of the task. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46, 115-127.
44. Marton, F., Watkins, D., & Tang, C. (1997). Discontinuities and continuities in the experience of learning: An interview study of high-school student in Hong Kong. Learning & Instruction, 7(1), 21-48.
45. McMillan, D., & Hiltonsmith, R. (1982). Adolescent at home: An exploratory study of the relationship between perception of family social climate, general well-being, and actual behavior in the home setting. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 11, 301-315.
46. Meyer, J.H.F. (1991). Study orchestration: the manifestation, interpretation and consequences of contextualised approaches to studying. Higher Education, 22, 297-316.
47. Meyer, J.H.F. (2000). The modelling of 'dissonant' study orchestration in higher education. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 5-18.
48. Meyer, J.M., & Shanahan, M.P. (2003). Dissonant forms of'memorising' and 'repetition'. Studies In Higher Education, 28(1), 5-20.
49. Meyer, J.H.F., Parsons, P., & Dunne, T.T. (1990). Study orchestration and learning outcome: Evidence of association over time among disadvantaged students. Higher Education, 20,245-269.
50. Moos, R.H. (1991). Connections between school, work, and family settings. In B.J. Fraser & H.J. Walberg (Eds.), Educational environments: Evaluation, antecedents, and consequences (pp. 29-53). New York: Pergamon.
51. Moos, R., & Moos, B. (1994). Family environment scale manual: Development, applications, and research. Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologist Press.
52. Peleg-Popko, O., & Kligman, A. (2002). Family environment, discrepancies between perceived actual and desirable environment, and children's test and trait anxiety. British Journal of Guidance & Counselling, 30(A), 451 -466,
53. Pintrich, P.R., & De Groot, E.V. (1990), Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(1), 33-40.
54. Presser, M., Ramsden, P., Trigwell, K., & Martin, E. (2003). Dissonance in experience of teaching and its relation to the quality of student learning. Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 37-48.
55. Prosser, M., Trigwell, K., Hazel, E., & Waterhouse, F. (2000). Students' experiences of studying physics concepts: The effects of disintegrated perceptions and approaches. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 61-74.
56. Rosnow, R.L., & Rosenthal, R. (1989). Statistical procedures and the justification of knowledge in psychological science. American Psychologist, 44, 1276-1284.
57. Ryan, B.A., & Adams, G.R. (1995). The family-school relationships model. In B.A. Ryan & O.K. Adams (Eds.), The family-school connection: Theory research, and practice (pp. 3-28). Thousands Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Säljö, R. (1982). Learning and understanding: A study of differences in constructing meaning from a text. Gothenhurg: Acta Universitatis Gothoburgensis
59. Seltnes, J.P. (1987). Improving study skills, London: Hodder and Stoughton.
60. Schmidt, A., & Padilla, B. (2003). Self-esteem and family challenge: An investigation of their effects on achievement. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 37(1), 37-46.
61. Snyder, P., & Lawson, S. (1993). Evaluating results using corrected and uncorrected effect size estimates. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(A), 334-349.
62. Trigwell, K., & Presser, M. (1991a). Improving the quality of student learning: The influence of learning context and student approaches to learning on learning outcomes. Higher Education, 22, 251-266.
63. Trigwell, K., & Presser, M. (1991b). Relating approaches to study and quality of learning outcomes at the course level. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 61, 265-275.
64. Van Rossum, E.J., & Schenk, S.M. (1984). The relationship between learning conception, study strategy and learning outcome. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 54, 73-83.
65. Vermunt, J., & Minnaert, A. (2003). Dissonance in student learning patterns: When to revise theory? Studies in Higher Education, 28(1), 49-61.
66. Vermunt, J.D., & Verloop, N. (2000). Dissonance in students' regulation of learning processes. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 15(1), 75-87.
67. Watkins, D. (2001). Correlates of approaches to learning: A cross-cultural meta-analysis. In R.J. Sternberg & L.F, Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking, learning, and cognitive styles (pp. 165-195). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
68. Webb, G. (1986). Factors affecting achievement in the University of Cambridge GCE A-Level geography examination. Educational Research, 28(2), 132-138.
69. Wong, N., & Watkins, D. (1998). A longitudinal study of the psychosocial environmental and learning approach in the Hong Kong classroom. The Journal of Educational Research, 91(A), 247-254.
70. Zhang, L. (2000). University students' learning approaches in three cultures: An investigation of Biggs' 3P model. The Journal of Psychology, 134(1), 37-55.