Teachers' mindsets and the integration of computer technology

British Journal of Educational Technology

Volumn 38, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 1056-1071

  Subramaniam, Karthigeyan ^a  

^a PENNSYLVANIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SCIENCE; DATA HANDLING; HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION; PSYCHOLOGY COMPUTING; STUDENTS;

COMPUTER TECHNOLOGY; MUTUAL INVESTMENT; PROXIMAL DEVELOPMENT;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 34748913066     PISSN: 00071013     EISSN: 14678535     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8535.2006.00693.x     Document Type: Article

References (65)

1. Becker, H., Ravitz, J. L. Wong, Y. (1999). Teacher and teacher-directed student use of computers and software. Report #3, teaching, learning, and computing: 1998 national survey. Irvine, CA : Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations, University of California.
2. Bigum, C. (1997). Teachers and computers: in control or being controlled? Australian Journal of Education, 41, 3, 247 261.
3. Blanck, G. (1990). Vygotsky: the man and his cause. In L. C. Moll (Ed Vygotsky and education (pp. 31 58). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
4. Bowers, C. A. (1988a). The cultural dimensions of educational computing: understanding the non-neutrality of technology. New York : Teachers College Press.
5. Bowers, C. A. (1988b). Teaching a nineteenth-century mode of thinking through a twentieth-century machine. Educational Theory, 38, 1, 41 46.
6. Bowers, C. A. (1990). Educational computing and the ecological crisis: some questions about our curriculum priorities. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 22, 1, 72 76.
7. Bowers, C. A. (1995). Educating for an ecologically sustainable culture: rethinking moral education, creativity, intelligence, and other modern orthodoxies. Albany, NY : State University of New York Press.
8. Bowers, C. A. (1997). The culture of denial: why the environmental movement needs a strategy for reforming universities and public schools. Albany, NY : State University of New York Press.
9. Bowers, C. A. (1998a). The paradox of technology: what's gained and lost? Thought and Action, 14, 1, 49 57.
10. Bowers, C. A. (1998b). Toward a balanced perspective on the educational uses of computers: Advantages, myths, and the responsibilities of educators. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 1, 1, 75 83.
11. Boyd, G. (1991). Emancipative education technology. In D. Hylynka J. C. Belland (Eds Paradigms regained: the uses of illuminative, semiotic, and postmodern criticisms as modes of inquiry in educational technology (pp. 83 92). Englewood Cliffs, New Jersey : Educational Technology Publications.
12. Bransford, J. D., Brown, A. L. Cocking, R. R. (2000). How people learn: brain, mind, experience, and school. Washington, DC : National Academy Press.
13. Bromley, H. (1997). The social chicken and the technological egg: educational computing and the technology/society divide. Educational Theory, 47, 1, 51 65.
14. Bromley, H. Apple, M. W. (Eds 1998). Education/technology/power: educational computing as a social practice. New York : State University of New York Press.
15. Budin, H. R. (1999). Essay review: the computer enters the classroom. Teachers College Record, 100, 3, 656 669.
16. Calderon, M. (1999). Teachers learning communities for co-operation in diverse settings. Theory into Practice, 38, 2, 95 99.
17. Carter, D. (2000). Articulating curriculum purpose with student assessment using new information technology. Curriculum and Teaching, 15, 1, 97 110.
18. Carter, G., Westbrook, S. L. Thompkins, C. D. (1999). Examining science tools as mediators of students' learning about circuits. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 36, 1, 89 106.
19. Confrey, J. (1995). How compatible are radical constructivism, sociocultural approaches, and social constructivism? In L. P. Steffe J. Gale (Eds Constructivism in education (pp. 185 225). New Jersey, NJ : Lawerence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
20. Davydov, V. V. (1995). The influence of L. S. Vygotsky on education. Educational Researcher, 24, 3, 12 21.
21. Day, C. (2000). Teachers in the twenty first century: time to renew the vision (1). Teachers and Teaching. Theory and Practice, 6, 1, 101 115.
22. Frawley, W. (1997). Vygotsky and cognitive science. Cambridge, MA : Harvard University Press.
23. Hedegaard, M. (1990). The zone of proximal development as basis for. In L. C. Moll (Ed Vygotsky and education (pp. 349 371). Cambridge : Cambridge University Press.
24. Hodson, D. Hodson, J. (1998a). From constructivism to social constructivism: a Vygotskian perspective on teaching and learning science. School Science Review, 79, 289, 33 41.
25. Hodson, D. Hodson, J. (1998b). Science education as enculturation: some implications for practice. School Science Review, 80, 290, 17 23.
26. Howe, A. C. (1996). Development of science concepts within a Vygotskian framework. Science Education, 80, 1, 35 51.
27. Katz, A. N. (1996). On interpreting statements as metaphor or irony: contextual heuristics and cognitive consequences. In J. S. Mio A. N. Katz (Eds Metaphor: implications and applications (pp. 1 22). Mahwah, New Jersey : Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Publishers.
28. Kerr, S. T. (Ed 1996). Visions of sugarplums: the future of technology, education, and the schools. In Technology and the future of schooling (pp. 1 25 Chicago, IL : The University of Chicago Press.
29. Knupfer, N. N. (1993). Teachers and educational computing: changing roles and changing pedagogy. In R. Muffoletto N. N. Knupfer (Eds Computers in education: social, political, and historical perspectives (pp. 163 179). Cresskill, New Jersey : Hampton Press, Inc.
30. Kozulin, A. (1990). Vygotsky's psychology: A biography of ideas. Cambridge : Harvard University Press.
31. Lakoff, G. (1994). What is metaphor? In J. A. Barnden (Ed Advances in connectionist and neural computation theory, Vol. 3 (pp. 203 258). Norwood, NJ : Ablex Publishing Corporation.
32. Lakoff, G. Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by. Chicago, IL : University of Chicago Press.
33. Lankshear, C. Snyder, I. (2000). Teachers and technoliteracy: managing literacy, technology and learning in schools. St. Leonards, NSW, Australia : Allen & Unwin.
34. Lauzon, A. C. (1999). Situating cognition and crossing borders: resisting the hegemony of mediated education. British Journal of Educational Technology, 30, 3, 261 276.
35. Lemerise, T. (1993). Piaget, Vygotsky and Logo. The Computing Teacher, 20, 24 28.
36. Lieberman, A. Miller, L. (1991). Revisiting the social realities of teaching. In A. Lieberman L. Miller (Eds Staff development for education in the '90s: new demands, new realities, new perspectives (2nd ed., pp. 92 109). New York : Teachers College Press.
37. Lincoln, Y. S. Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
38. Mandinach, E. B. Cline, H. F. (1994). Modeling and simulation in the secondary school curriculum: the impact on teachers. Interactive Learning Environments, 4, 3, 271 289.
39. Mandinach, E. B. Cline, H. F. (1996). Classroom dynamics: The impact of a technology-based curriculum innovation on teaching and learning. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 14, 1, 83 102.
40. Mason, M. (2000). Teachers as critical mediators of knowledge. Journal of Philosophy of Education, 34, 2, 343 352.
41. Miller, P. H. (1993). Theories of developmental psychology (3rd ed New York : W. H. Freeman and Company.
42. Morton, C. (1996). The modern land of laputa: where computers are used in education. Phi Delta Kappan, 77, 6, 416 419.
43. Muffoletto, R. (1994). Technology and restructuring education: constructing a context. Educational Technology, 34, 2, 24 28.
44. Muffoletto, R. (1996). A discourse of benefit: technology and school reforms in the USA. Journal of Information Technology for Teacher Education, 5, 1-2, 139 153.
45. Munby, H. (1986). Metaphor in the thinking of teachers: an exploratory study. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 18, 2, 197 209.
46. Munby, H. (1987). Metaphor and teachers' knowledge. Research in the Teaching of English, 21, 4, 377 397.
47. Nickerson, R. S. (1995). Can technology help teach for understanding. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West M. S. Wiske (Eds Software goes to school (pp. 7 17). New York : Oxford University Press.
48. Olson, J. (1990). Information technology in schools: Institutional rewards and moral dilemmas. In : M. P. C. Day P. Denicolo (Eds Insight into teachers thinking and practice (pp. 71 78). London : The Falmer Press.
49. Olson, J. (1992). Trojan horse or teacher's pet? Computers and the teacher' influence. International. Journal of Educational Research, 17, 1, 77 84.
50. Olson, J. (1997). Technology in the school curriculum: the moral dimensions of making things. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 29, 4, 383 390.
51. Olson, J. (2000). Trojan horse or teacher's pet? Computers and the culture of the schools. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 32, 1, 1 8.
52. Olson, J., James, E. Lang, M. (1999). Changing the subject: the challenge of innovation to teacher professionalism in OECD countries. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 31, 1, 69 82.
53. Patton, M. Q. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods (2nd ed Newbury Park, CA : Sage.
54. Perkins, D. N. (1985). The fingertip effect: how information-processing technology shapes thinking. Educational Researcher, 14, 7, 11 17.
55. Perkins, D., Crismond, D., Simmons, R. Unger, C. (1995). Inside understanding. In D. N. Perkins, J. L. Schwartz, M. M. West M. S. Wiske (Eds Software goes to school (pp. 70 87). New York : Oxford University Press.
56. Rogers, C. R. (1979). The foundations of the person-centered approach. Education, 100, 2, 98 107.
57. Rogers, C. R. (1987). The underlying theory: drawn from experience with individuals and groups. Counseling and Values, 32, 1, 38 46.
58. Roth, W. M. (1993). Metaphors and conversational analysis as tools in reflection on teaching practice: two perspectives on teacher-student interactions in open-inquiry science. Science Education, 77, 4, 351 373.
59. Salomon, G. (1998). Technology's promises and dangers in a psychological and educational context. Theory into Practice, 37, 1, 4 10.
60. Samaras, A. Gismondi, S. (1998). Scaffolds in the field: Vygotskian interpretation in a teacher education program. Teaching and Teacher Education, 14, 7, 715 733.
61. Sleegers, P. Van den Berg, R. (2000). Building innovative schools: The need for new approaches. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16, 7, 801 808.
62. Tharp, R. Gallimore, R. (1988). Rousing minds to life. New York : Cambridge University Press.
63. Tudge, J. R. Winterhoff, P. A. (1993). Vygotsky, Piaget, and Bandura: perspectives on the relations between the social world and cognitive development. Human Development, 36, 61 81.
64. van't Hooft, M., Diaz, S. Swan, K. (2004). Examining the potential of handheld computers: findings from the Ohio PEP project. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 30, 4, 295 311.
65. Wertsch, J. V. Tulviste, P. (1992). L. S. Vygotsky and contemporary developmental psychology. Developmental Psychology, 28, 4, 548 557.