Metamemorial influences in recognition memory: Pictorial encoding reduces conjunction errors

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 35, Issue 5, 2007, Pages 1067-1073

  Lloyd, Marianne E ^a  

^a SETON HALL UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; ERROR; FALSE MEMORY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MEMORY; NORMAL HUMAN; READING; RECALL; SEMANTIC MEMORY; UNIVERSITY STUDENT; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 34548650782     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03193478     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. BUDSON, A. E., DROLLER, D. B. J., DODSON, C. S., SCHACTER, D. L., RUGG, M. D., HOLCOMB, P. J., & DAFFNER, K. R. (2005). Electrophysiological dissociation of picture versus word encoding: The distinctiveness heuristic as a retrieval orientation. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17, 1181-1193.
2. CASTEL, A. D., & CRAIK, F. I. M. (2003). The effects of aging and divided attention on memory for item and associative information. Psychology of Aging, 18, 873-885.
3. DIANA, R., REDER, L. M., ARNDT, J., & PARK, H. (2006). Models of recognition: A review of arguments in favor of a dual process account Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 13, 1-21.
4. DODSON, C. S., & HEGE, A. C. G. (2005). Speeded retrieval abolishes the false-memory suppression effect: Evidence for the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 12, 726-731.
5. DODSON, C. S., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2001). "If I had said it I would have remembered it": Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155-161.
6. DODSON, C. S., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2002). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 782-803.
7. GALLO, D. A. (2004). Using recall to reduce false recognition: Diagnostic and disqualifying monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 120-128.
8. GALLO, D. A., BELL, D. M., BEIER, J. S., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2006). Two types of recollection-based monitoring in young and older adults: Recall-to-reject and the distinctiveness heuristic. Memory, 14, 730-741.
9. GHETTI, S. (2003). Memory for nonoccurrences: The role of metacognition. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 722-739.
10. GHETTI, S., & ALEXANDER, K. W. (2004). "If it happened, I would remember it": Strategic use of event memorability in the rejection of false events. Child Development, 75, 542-561.
11. GHETTI, S., & CASTELLI, P. (2006). Developmental differences in false-event rejection: Effects of memorability-based warnings. Memory, 14, 762-776.
12. GHETTI, S., PAPINI, S., & ANGELINI, L. (2006). The development of the memorability-based strategy: Insight from a training study. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 94, 206-228.
13. GILLUND, G., & SHIFFRIN, R. M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
14. GLANZER, M., & ADAMS, J. K. (1985). The mirror effect in recognition memory. Memory & Cognition, 13, 8-20.
15. HEGE, A. C. G., & DODSON, C. S. (2004). Why distinctive information reduces false memories: Evidence for both impoverished relational-encoding and distinctiveness heuristic accounts. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 787-795.
16. HICKS, J. L., & MARSH, R. L. (2002). Source monitoring does not alleviate (and may exacerbate) the occurrence of memory conjunction errors. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 315-326.
17. HINTZMAN, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
18. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
19. JACOBY, L. L., JONES, T. C., & DOLAN, P. O. (1998). Two effects of repetition: Support for a two-process model of knowledge judgments and exclusion errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 5, 705-709.
20. JACOBY, L. L., KELLEY, C. M., & DYWAN, J. (1989). Memory attributions. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in Honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 391-422). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. JACOBY, L. L., & WHITEHOUSE, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influence by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
22. JAMEISON, R. K., THOMSON, R. F., CUDDY, L. L., & MEWHORT, D. J. K. (2003) Do conjunction errors in auditory recognition imply feature migration? Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 57, 125-130.
23. JOHNSON, M. K., HASHTROUDI, S., & LINDSAY, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 2-28.
24. JONES, T. C. (2004). Perceptual specificity of priming for compound words not presented during study. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 11, 362-366
25. JONES, T. C. (2005). Study repetition and the rejection of conjunction lures. Memory, 13, 499-515.
26. JONES, T. C. (2006). Editing (out) generated study words in a recognition exclusion task; Effects of response signal delay and generation procedure. Memory, 14, 712-729.
27. JONES, T. C., & ATCHLEY, P. (2002). Conjunction error rates on a continuous recognition memory test: Little evidence for recollection. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory, & Cognition, 28, 374-379.
28. JONES, T. C., BARTLETT, J. C., & WADE, K. A. (2006). Nonverbal conjunction errors in recognition memory: Support for familiarity but not feature bundling. Journal of Memory & Language, 55, 138-155.
29. JONES, T. C., & JACOBY, L. L. (2001). Feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory: Evidence for dual-process theory. Journal of Memory & Language, 45, 82-102.
30. KROLL, N. E. A., KNIGHT, R. T., METCALFE, J., WOLF, E. S., & TULVING, E. (1996). Cohesion failure as a source of memory illusions. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 176-196.
31. LAMPINEN, J. M., ODEGARD, T. N., & NEUSCHATZ, J. S. (2004). Robust recollection rejection in the memory conjunction paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 30, 332-342.
32. LLOYD, M. E., WESTERMAN, D. L., & MILLER, J. K. (2003). The fluency heuristic in recognition memory: The effect of repetition. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 603-614.
33. ODEGARD, T. N., & LAMPINEN, J. M. (2004). Memory conjunction errors for autobiographical events: More than just familiarity. Memory, 12, 288-300.
34. ODEGARD, T. N., LAMPINEN, J. M., & TOGLIA, M. P. (2005). Meaning's moderating effect on recollection rejection. Journal of Memory & Language, 53, 416-429.
35. REINITZ, M. T., & ALEXANDER, R. (1996). Mechanism of facilitation in primed perceptual identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 129-135.
36. REINITZ, M. T., & DEMB, J. B. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for compound words. Memory & Cognition, 22, 687-694.
37. REINITZ, M. T., LAMMERS, W. J., & COCHRAN, B. P. (1992). Memory-conjunction errors: Miscombination of stored stimulus features can produce illusions of memory. Memory & Cognition, 20, 1-11.
38. REINITZ, M. T., MORRISSEY, J., & DEMB, J. (1994). Role of attention in face encoding. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 161-168.
39. ROBB, W. G. K., & RUGG, M. D. (2002). Electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval orientation and retrieval effort. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 583-589.
40. ROTELLO, C. M. (1999). Metacognition and memory for nonoccurrence. Memory, 7, 43-63.
41. SCHACTER, D. L., CENDAN, D. L., DODSON, C. S., & CLIFFORD, E. R. (2001). Retrieval conditions and false recognition: Testing the distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 827-833.
42. SCHACTER, D. L., ISRAEL, L., & RACINE, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 1-24.
43. SLUZENSKI, J., NEWCOMBE, N., & KOVACS, S. L. (2006). Binding, relational memory, and recall of naturalistic events: A developmental perspective. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 32, 89-100
44. UNDERWOOD, B. J., & ZIMMERMAN, J. (1973). The syllable as a source of error in multisyllable word recognition. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 12, 338-344.
45. WESTERMAN, D. L., LLOYD, M. E., & MILLER, J. K. (2002). The attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 607-617.
46. WESTERMAN, D. L., MILLER, J. K., & LLOYD, M. E. (2003). Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition. Memory & Cognition, 31, 619-629.
47. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1235-1253.
48. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS, L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141-165.
49. YONELINAS, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.
50. YONELINAS, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517.