Do conjunction errors in auditory recognition imply feature migration?

Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology

Volumn 57, Issue 2, 2003, Pages 125-130

  Jamieson, Randall K ^a   Thompson, William Forde ^b   Cuddy, Lola L ^a   Mewhort, D J K ^a  

^a QUEEN S UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HEARING; HUMAN; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; PSYCHOPHYSICS; RECOGNITION;

HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PITCH PERCEPTION; PSYCHOACOUSTICS; RECOGNITION (PSYCHOLOGY);

EID: 0041760740     PISSN: 11961961     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/h0087418     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
2. Deutsch, D. (1986). Auditory pattern recognition. In K. Boff, L. Kaufman. & J. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. 2. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 1-49). New York: Wiley.
3. Eich, J. M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
4. Hall, M. D., Pastore, R. E., Acker, B. E., & Huang, W. (2000). Evidence for auditory feature-integration with spatially distributed items. Perception & Psychophysics, 62, 1243-1257.
5. Hintzman, D. L. (1984). MINERVA2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 16, 96-101.
6. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
7. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition-memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
8. Humphreys, M. S., Pike, R., Bain, J. D., & Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 36-67.
9. Murdock, B. B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
10. Murdock, B. B. (1983). A distributed model for serial-order information. Psychological Review, 90, 316-338.
11. Press, W. H., Teukolsky, S. A., Vetterling, W. T., & Flannery, B. P. (1992). Numerical recipes in FORTRAN: The art of scientific computing (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.
12. Raaijmakers, J. G., & Shiffrin, R. M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
13. Shiffrin, R. M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
14. Thompson, W. F. (1994). Sensitivity to combinations of musical parameters: Pitch with duration, and pitch pattern with durational pattern. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 363-374.
15. Thompson, W. F., Hall, M. D., and Pressing, J. (2001). Illusory conjunctions of pitch and duration in unfamiliar tone sequences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 27, 128-140.
16. Thompson, W. F., & Sinclair, D. (1993). Pitch pattern, durational pattern, and timbre: A study of the perceptual integration of auditory qualities. Psychomusicology, 12, 3-21.
17. Treisman, A. (1986). Properties, parts, and objects. In K. R. Boff, L. Kaufman, & J. P. Thomas (Eds.), Handbook of perception and human performance: Vol. II. Cognitive processes and performance (pp. 35-70). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
18. Treisman, A., & Gelade, G. (1980). A feature-integration theory of attention. Cognitive Psychology, 12, 97-136.
19. Treisman, A., & Paterson, R. (1984). Emergent features, attention, and object perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 10, 12-31.
20. Treisman, A., & Schmidt, N. (1982). Illusory conjunctions in the perception of objects. Cognitive Psychology, 14, 107-141.