Electrophysiological dissociation of picture versus word encoding: The distinctiveness heuristic as a retrieval orientation

Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience

Volumn 17, Issue 8, 2005, Pages 1181-1193

  Budson, Andrew E ^a,b,c   Droller, Daniel B J ^c   Dodson, Chad S ^d   Schacter, Daniel L ^e   Rugg, Michael D ^f   Holcomb, Philip J ^g   Daffner, Kirk R ^c,h  

^a VETERANS AFFAIRS MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^b BOSTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c BRIGHAM AND WOMEN S HOSPITAL   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

^e HARVARD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^f UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^g TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^h HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; AUDITORY STIMULATION; DECISION MAKING; DISTINCTIVENESS HEURISTIC; DRAWING; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVENT RELATED POTENTIAL; EXPECTATION; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; FRONTAL LOBE; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MALE; MEMORY CONSOLIDATION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECALL; RECOGNITION; SKIN ELECTRODE; STIMULUS RESPONSE; UNITED STATES; VISUAL STIMULATION;

ADULT; BRAIN; BRAIN MAPPING; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY; ELECTROPHYSIOLOGY; EVOKED POTENTIALS; FEMALE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; MALE; MEMORY; PSYCHOLINGUISTICS; SIGNAL DETECTION (PSYCHOLOGY); VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 23944476056     PISSN: 0898929X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/0898929055002517     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Allan, K., Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1998). Electrophysiological evidence for dissociable processes contributing to recollection. Acta Psychologica, 98, 231-252.
2. Budson, A. E., Dodson, C. S., Daffner, K. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2005). Metacognition and false recognition in Alzheimer's disease: Further exploration of the distinctiveness heuristic. Neuropsychology, 19, 253-258.
3. Budson, A. E., Dodson, C. S., Vatner, J. M., Daffner, K. R., Black, P. M., & Schacter, D. L. (2005). Metacognition and false recognition in patients with frontal lobe lesions: The distinctiveness heuristic. Neuropsychologia, 43, 860-871.
4. Hudson, A. E., Daffner, K. R., Desikan, R., & Schacter, D. L. (2000). When false recognition is unopposed by true recognition: Gist-based memory distortion in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychology, 14, 277-287.
5. Budson, A. E., Sitarski, J., Daffner, K. R., & Schacter, D. L. (2002). False recognition of pictures versus words in Alzheimer's disease: The distinctiveness heuristic. Neuropsychology, 16, 163-173.
6. Chaiken, S., Lieberman, A., & Eagly, A. H. (1989). Heuristic and systematic information processing within and beyond the persuasion context. In J. S. Uleman & J. A. Bargh (Eds.), Unintended thought (pp. 212-252). New York: Guilford Press.
7. Clark, S. E., & Gronlund, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
8. Curran, T. (2000). Brain potentials of recollection and familiarity. Memory and Cognition, 28, 923-938.
9. Curran, T., & Cleary, A. M. (2003). Using ERPs to dissociate recollection from familiarity in picture recognition. Cognitive Brain Research, 15, 191-205.
10. Curran, T., Schacter, D. L., Johnson, M. K., & Spinks, R. A. (2001). Brain potentials reflect behavioral differences in true and false recognition. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13, 201-216.
11. Dale, A. M. (1994). Source localization and spatial discriminant analysis of event-related potentials: Linear approaches (brain cortical surface). Dissertation Abstracts International, 55-07B, 2559.
12. Dodson, C. S., Koutstaal, W., & Schacter, D. L. (2000). Escape from illusion: Reducing false memories. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 391-397.
13. Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2001). 'If I had said it I would have remembered it': Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 155-161.
14. Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2002a). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 782-803.
15. Dodson, C. S., & Schacter, D. L. (2002b). Aging and strategic retrieval processes: Reducing false memories with a distinctiveness heuristic. Psychology and Aging, 17, 405-415.
16. Duzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H. J., & Tulving, E. (1997). Event-related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, U.S.A., 94, 5973-5978.
17. Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S., & Arsenault, A. (2002). Electrophysiological response during source memory decisions in older and younger adults. Brain and Cognition, 49, 322-340.
18. Dywan, J., Segalowitz, S. J., & Webster, L. (1998). Source monitoring: ERP evidence for greater reactivity to nontarget information in older adults. Brain and Cognition, 36, 390-430.
19. Fernandez-Duque, D., Baird, J. A., & Posner, M. I. (2000). Executive attention and metacognitive regulation. Conscious and Cognition, 9, 288-307.
20. Fletcher, P. C., & Henson, R. N. A. (2001). Frontal lobes and human memory: Insights from functional neuroimaging. Brain, 124, 849-881.
21. Gallo, D. A., Weiss, J. A., & Schacter, D. L. (2004). Monitoring false recognition with criterial recollection tests: Distinctiveness heuristic versus criterion shifts. Journal of Memory & Language, 51, 473-493.
22. Goldmann, R. E., Sullivan, A. L., Droller, D. B., Rugg, M. D., Curran, T., Holcomb, P. J., Schacter, D. L., Daffner, K. R., & Budson, A. E. (2003). Late frontal brain potentials distinguish true and false recognition. NeuroReport, 14, 1717-1720.
23. Heckers, S., Rauch, S. L., Goff, D., Savage, C. R., Schacter, D. L., Fischman, A. J., & Alpert, N. M. (1998). Impaired recruitment of the hippocampus during conscious recollection in schizophrenia. Nature Neuroscience, 1, 318-323.
24. Henson, R. N., Rylands, A., Ross, E., Vuilleumeir, P., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). The effect of repetition lag on electrophysiological and haemodynamic correlates of visual object priming. Neuroimage, 21, 1674-1689.
25. Herron, J. E., & Rugg, M. D. (2003). Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 15, 843-854.
26. Israel, L., & Schacter, D. L. (1997). Pictorial encoding reduces false recognition of semantic associates. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 577-581.
27. Jennings, J. M., & Jacoby, L. L. (1997). An opposition procedure for detecting age-related deficits in recollecting: Telling effects of repetition. Psychology and Aging, 12, 352-361.
28. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 126-135.
29. Johnson, M. K., Kounios, J., & Nolde, S. F. (1996). Electrophysiological brain activity and memory source monitoring. NeuroReport, 7, 2929-2932.
30. Johnson, M. K., Nolde, S. F., Mather, M., Kounios, J., Schacter, D. L., & Curran, T. (1997). The similarity of brain activity associated with true and false recognition memory depends on test format. Psychological Science, 8, 250-257.
31. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1998). False memories and confabulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 2, 137-145.
32. Kahneman, D., Slovic, P., & Tversky, A. (1982). Judgement under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. New York: Cambridge University Press.
33. Kensinger, E. A., & Schacter, D. L. (1999). When true memories suppress false memories: Effects of aging. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 399-415.
34. McDermott, K. B. (1996). The persistence of false memories in list recall. Journal of Memory and language, 35, 212-230.
35. Mitchell, K. J., Johnson, M. K., Raye, C. L., & Greene, E. J. (2004). Prefrontal cortex activity associated with source monitoring in a working memory task. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16, 921-934.
36. Nessler, D., Mecklinger, A., & Penney, T. B. (2001). Event related brain potentials and illusory memories: Effects of differential encoding. Cognitive Brain Research, 10, 283-301.
37. Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (2000). Neural correlates of memory retrieval and evaluation. Cognitive Brain Research, 9, 209-222.
38. Robb, W. G., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval orientation and retrieval effort. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 583-589.
39. Rotello, C. M., & Heit, E. (1999). Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 432-453.
40. Rotello, C. M., Macmillan, N. A., & Van Tassel, G. (2000). Recall-to-reject in recognition: Evidence from ROC curves. Journal of Memory and Language, 43, 67-88.
41. Rugg, M. D., & Allan, K. (2000). Memory retrieval: An electrophysiological perspective. In M. S. Gazzaniga (Ed.), The new cognitive neurosciences (pp. 805-816). Cambridge: MIT Press.
42. Rugg, M. D., & Wilding, E. L. (2000). Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 108-115.
43. Schacter, D. L. (1996). Searching for memory: The brain, the mind, and the past. New York, NY: Basic Books.
44. Schacter, D. L., Israel, L., & Racine, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory and Language, 40, 1-24.
45. Schacter, D. L., Verfaellie, M., Anes, M. D., & Racine, C. (1998). When true recognition suppresses false recognition: Evidence from amnesic patients. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 10, 668-679.
46. Schacter, D. L., & Wiseman, A. L. (in press). Reducing memory errors: The distinctiveness heuristic. In R. R. Hunt & J. Worthen (Eds.), Distinctiveness and memory. New York: Oxford University Press.
47. Shimamura, A. P. (2000). Toward a cognitive neuroscience of metacognition. Conscious and Cognition, 9, 313-323.
48. Smith, J. A., & Knight, R. G. (2002). Memory processing in Alzheimer's disease. Neuropsychologia, 40, 666-682.
49. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
50. Snodgrass, J. G., & Vanderwart, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 6, 174-215.
51. Strack, F., & Bless, H. (1994). Memory for nonoccurrences: Metacognitive and presuppositional strategies. Journal of Memory and Language, 33, 203-217.
52. Underwood, B. J., & Freund, J. S. (1970). Testing effects in the recognition of words. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 9, 117-125.
53. Weiss, A. P., Dodson, C. S., Goff, D. C., Schacter, D. L., & Heckers, S. (2002). Intact suppression of increased false recognition in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 159, 1506-1513.
54. Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119, 889-905.
55. Yovel, G., & Paller, K. A. (2004). The neural basis of the butcher-on-the-bus phenomenon: When a face seems familiar but is not remembered. Neuroimage, 21, 789-800.