Change in perceptual form attenuates the use of the fluency heuristic in recognition

Memory and Cognition

Volumn 31, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 619-629

  Westerman, Deanne L ^a   Miller, Jeremy K ^a   Lloyd, Marianne E ^a  

^a BINGHAMTON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSOCIATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; NORMAL HUMAN; PHOTOGRAPHY; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL MEMORY; WORD RECOGNITION;

EID: 0038309715     PISSN: 0090502X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196102     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. BERNSTEIN, I. H., & WELCH, K. R. (1991). Awareness, false recognition, and the familiarity-priming effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 120, 324-328.
2. CLARK, S. E. (1992). Word frequency effects in associative and item recognition. Memory & Cognition, 20, 231-243.
3. CLARKE, R., & MORTON, J. (1983). Cross modality facilitation in tachistoscopic word recognition. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 35A, 79-96.
4. CRAIK, F. I. M., MOSCOVITCH, M., & McDOWD, J. M. (1994). Contributions of surface and conceptual information to performance on implicit and explicit memory tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 864-875.
5. DEWHURST, S. A., & CONWAY, M. A. (1994). Pictures, images, and recollective experience. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 20, 1088-1098.
6. DODSON, C. S., & SCHACTER, D. L. (2002). When false recognition meets metacognition: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 782-803.
7. DURSO, F. T., & JOHNSON, M. K. (1979). Facilitation in naming and categorizing repeated pictures and words. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning & Memory, 5, 449-459.
8. ELLIS, A. W. (1982). Modality-specific repletion priming of auditory word recognition. Current Psychological Research, 2, 123-127.
9. FRIGO, L. C., REAS, D. L., & LECOMPTE, D. C. (1999). Revelation without presentation: Counterfeit study list yields robust revelation effect. Memory & Cognition, 27, 339-343.
10. GELLATLY, A., BANTON, P., & WOODS, C. (1995). Salience and awareness in the familiarity-priming effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 21, 1374-1379.
11. GOLDINGER, S. D., KLEIDER, H. M., & SHELLEY, E. (1999). The marriage of perception and memory: Creating two-way illusions with words and voices. Memory & Cognition, 27, 328-338.
12. HIGHAM, P. A., & VOKEY, J. R. (2000). Judgment heuristics and recognition memory: Prime identification and target-processing fluency. Memory & Cognition, 28, 574-584.
13. HOCKLEY, W. E., & CONSOLI, A. (1999). Familiarity and recollection in item and associative recognition. Memory & Cognition, 27, 657-664.
14. JACOBY, L. L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 30, 513-541.
15. JACOBY, L. L., & DALLAS, M. (1981). On the relationship between autobiographical memory and perceptual learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 110, 306-340.
16. JACOBY, L. L., & HAYMAN, C. A. G. (1987). Specific visual transfer in visual word identification. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 13, 456-463.
17. JACOBY, L. L., & WHITEHOUSE, K. (1989). An illusion of memory: False recognition influenced by unconscious perception. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 126-135.
18. JACOBY, L. L., WOLOSHYN, V., & KELLEY, C. (1989). Becoming famous without being recognized: Unconscious influences of memory produced by divided attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 118, 115-125.
19. JOHNSTON, W., HAWLEY, K., & ELLIOTT, J. (1991). Contribution of perceptual fluency to recognition judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 210-223.
20. KAMAS, E. N., & REDER, L. M. (1995). The role of familiarity in cognitive processing. In R. F. Lorch & E. J. O'Brien, (Eds.), Sources of coherence in reading (pp. 177-202). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. KELLEY, C. M., & RHODES, M. G. (2002). Making sense and nonsense of experience: Attributions in memory and judgment. In B. H. Ross (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (Vol. 41, pp. 293-320). San Diego: Academic Press.
22. KORIAT, A., & LEVY-SADOT, R (2001). The combined contributions of the cue-familiarity and accessibility heuristics to feelings of knowing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 34-53.
23. KUČERA, H., & FRANCIS, W. N. (1967). Computational analysis of present-day American English. Providence, RI: Brown University Press.
24. LLOYD, M. E., WESTERMAN, D. L., & MILLER, J. M. (2003). The fluency heuristic in recognition memory: The effect of repetition. Journal of Memory & Language, 48, 603-614.
25. MANDLER, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
26. MASSON, M., & CALDWELL, J. (1998). Conceptually driven encoding episodes create perceptual misattributions. Acta Psychologica, 98, 183-210.
27. MURRELL, G. A., & MORTON, J. (1974). Word recognition and morphemic structure. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 102, 963-968.
28. NEISSER, U. (1954). An experimental distinction between perceptual process and verbal response. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 47, 399-402.
29. RAJARAM, S. (1993). Remembering and knowing: Two means of access to the personal past. Memory & Cognition, 21, 89-102.
30. RAJARAM, S. (1996). Perceptual effects on remembering: Recollective processes in picture recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 22, 365-377.
31. RAJARAM, S., & ROEDIGER, H. L., III (1993). Direct comparison of four implicit memory tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 765-776.
32. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & BLAXTON, T. A. (1987). Effects of varying modality, surface features, and retention interval on priming in word fragment completion. Memory & Cognition, 15, 379-388.
33. SCHACTER, D. L., ISRAEL, L., & RACINE, C. (1999). Suppressing false recognition in younger and older adults: The distinctiveness heuristic. Journal of Memory & Language, 40, 1-24.
34. SNODGRASS, J. G., & CORWIN, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
35. SNODGRASS, J. G., & VANDERWART, M. (1980). A standardized set of 260 pictures: Norms for name agreement, image agreement, familiarity, and visual complexity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 6, 174-215.
36. SRINIVAS, K. (1993).Perceptual specificity in nonverbal priming. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 582-602.
37. TVERSKY, A., & KAHNEMAN, D. (1974). Judgment under uncertainty: Heuristics and biases. Science, 185, 1124-1131.
38. VERFAELLIE, M., & CERMAK, L. S. (1999). Perceptual fluency as a cue for recognition judgments in amnesia. Neuropsychology, 13, 198-205.
39. WAGNER, A. D., GABRIELI, J. D. E., & VERFAELLIE, M. (1997). Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 305-323.
40. WELDON, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 526-541.
41. WELDON, M. S., ROEDIGER, H. L., III, BEITEL, D. A., & JOHNSTON, T. R. (1995). Perceptual and conceptual processes in implicit and explicit tests with picture fragment and word fragment cues. Journal of Memory & Language, 34, 268-285.
42. WELDON, M. S., ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & CHALLIS, B. H. (1989). The properties of retrieval cues constrain the picture superiority effect. Memory & Cognition, 17, 95-105.
43. WESTERMAN, D. L. (2001). The role of familiarity in item recognition, associative recognition, and plurality recognition on self-paced and speeded tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 723-732.
44. WESTERMAN, D. L., LLOYD, M. L., & MILLER, J. M. (2002). On the attribution of perceptual fluency in recognition memory: The role of expectation. Journal of Memory & Language, 47, 607-617.
45. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A. (1993). Illusions of familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 19, 1235-1253.
46. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & LEBOE, J. P. (2000). The heuristic basis of remembering and classification: Fluency, generation and resemblance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 129, 84-106.
47. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & PRICE, J. R. (2001). Implicit/explicit memory versus analytic/nonanalytic processing: Rethinking the mere exposure effect. Memory & Cognition, 29, 234-246.
48. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS L. D. (1998). Why do strangers feel familiar, but friends don't? A discrepancy-attribution account of feelings of familiarity. Acta Psychologica, 98, 141-165.
49. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS, I. D. (2000). The source of feelings of familiarity: The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 547-565.
50. WHITTLESEA, B. W. A., & WILLIAMS, L. D. (2001). The discrepancy-attribution hypothesis: I. The heuristic basis of feelings and familiarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 27, 3-13.
51. YONELINAS, A. P. (1997). Recognition memory ROCs for item and associative information: The contribution of recollection and familiarity. Memory & Cognition, 25, 747-763.
52. YONELINAS, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.
53. YONELINAS, A. P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory & Language, 46, 441-517.