Perceptual specificity of priming for compound words not presented

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2004, Pages 362-366

  Jones, Todd C ^a  

^a VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; HUMAN; LINGUISTICS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISION;

HUMANS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; VISUAL PERCEPTION; VOCABULARY;

EID: 4644252398     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/BF03196583     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. BLUM, D., & YONELINAS, A. P. (2001). Transfer across modality in perceptual implicit memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 8, 147-154.
2. CHAPPELL, M., & HUMPHREYS, M. S. (1994). An auto-associative neural network for sparse representations: Analysis and application to models of recognition and cued recall. Psychological Review, 101, 103-128.
3. GARDINER, J. M. (1988). Generation and priming effects in word-fragment completion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 14, 495-501.
4. GARDINER, J. M., DAWSON, A. S., & SUTTON, E. A. (1989). Specificity and generality of enhanced priming effects for self-generated study items. American Journal of Psychology, 102, 295-305.
5. JONES, T. C., JACOBY, L. L., & GELLIS, L. A. (2001). Cross-modal feature and conjunction errors in recognition memory. Journal of Memory & Language, 44, 131-152.
6. REINITZ, M. T., & ALEXANDER, R. (1996). Mechanisms of facilitation in primed perceptual identification. Memory & Cognition, 24, 129-135.
7. REINITZ, M. T., & DEMB, J. B. (1994). Implicit and explicit memory for compound words. Memory & Cognition, 22, 687-694.
8. REINITZ, M. T., VERFAELLIE, M., & MILBERG, W. P. (1996). Memory conjunction errors in normal and amnesic subjects. Journal of Memory & Language, 35, 286-299.
9. RICHARDSON-KLAVEHN, A., & GARDINER, J. M. (1998). Depth-of-processing effects on priming in stem completion: Tests of the voluntary-contamination, conceptual-processing, and lexical-processing hypotheses. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 24, 593-609.
10. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, & MCDERMOTT, K. B. (1993). Implicit memory in normal human subjects. In H. Spinnler & F. Boller (Eds.), Handbook of neuropsychology (pp. 63-151). Amsterdam: Elsevier.
11. ROEDIGER, H. L., III, WELDON, M. S., & CHALLIS, B. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger III & F. I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour of Endel Tulving (pp. 3-41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. SCHNEIDER, W., ESCHMAN, A., & ZUCCOLOTTO, A. (2002a). E-prime reference guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
13. SCHNEIDER, W., ESCHMAN, A., & ZUCCOLOTTO, A. (2002b). E-prime user's guide. Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
14. TEHAN, G., & HUMPHREYS, M. S. (1998). Creating proactive interference in immediate recall: Building a DOG from a DART, a MOP, and a FIG. Memory & Cognition, 26, 477-489.
15. WAGNER, A. D., GABRIELI, J. D. E., & VERFAELLIE, M. (1997). Dissociations between familiarity processes in explicit recognition and implicit perceptual memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 23, 305-323.
16. WELDON, M. S. (1991). Mechanisms underlying priming on perceptual tests. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 17, 526-541.