Cross-functionality and charged behavior of the new product development teams in Taiwan's information technology industries

Technovation

Volumn 27, Issue 10, 2007, Pages 605-615

  Lee, Chuan ^a   Chen, Wen Jung ^a  

^a MING CHUAN UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

Charged behavior; Cross functionality; Innovation degree; NPD project performance

Indexed keywords

BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; PROFITABILITY; PROJECT MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIC PLANNING; TECHNOLOGICAL FORECASTING;

CROSS-FUNCTIONALITY; INNOVATION DEGREE; NPD PROJECT PERFORMANCE;

INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY;

EID: 34548534577     PISSN: 01664972     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.02.012     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Amabile T.M. The Social Psychology of Creativity (1983), Springer, New York
2. Ancona D.G., and Caldwell D.F. Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science 3 (1992) 321-341
3. Andrews J., and Smith D.C. In search of marketing imagination: factors affecting the creativity of marketing programs for mature products. Journal of Marketing Research 33 May (1996) 174-187
4. Armstrong J.S., and Overton T.S. Estimating nonresponse bias in mail survey. Journal of Marketing Research 14 (1977) 396-402
5. Bettenhausen K.L. Five years of groups research: what we have learned and what needs to be addressed. Journal of Management 17 (1991) 345-381
6. Brown S.L., and Eisenhardt K.M. Product development: past research, present findings, and future directions. Academy of Management Review 20 2 (1995) 343-378
7. Caloghirou Y., Kastelli I., and Tsakanikas A. Internal capabilities and external knowledge sources: complements or substitutes for innovative performance?. Technovation 24 1 (2004) 29-39
8. Chattopadhyay P. Beyond direct and symmetrical effects: the influence of demographic similarity on organizational citizenship behavior. Academy of Management Journal 42 (1999) 273-287
9. Cohen S.G., and Bailey D.E. What makes teams work: group effectiveness research from the shop floor to the executive suite?. Journal of Management 23 (1997) 239-290
10. Cooper R.G. New products: what separates the winners from losers. In: Rosenau M.D. (Ed). The PDMA Handbook of New Product Development (1996), Wiley, New York 3-18
11. Cooper R.G. The invisible success factors in product innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 16 2 (1999) 115-133
12. Dougherty D. Interpretive barriers to successful product innovation in large firms. Organization Science 3 (1992) 179-202
13. Fredericks E. Cross-functional involvement in new product development: a resource dependency and human capital perspective. Qualitative Market Research 8 3 (2005) 327-341
14. Griffin A. PDMA research on new product development practices: updating trends and benchmarking best practices. Journal of Product Innovation Management 14 (1997) 429-458
15. Griffin A., and Hauser J. Integration of R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 (1996) 191-215
16. Gupta A.K., Raj S.P., and Wilemon D. A model for studying R&D-marketing interface in high-technology firms. Journal of Marketing 50 (1986) 7-17
17. Gupta A.K., Raj S.P., and Wilemon D. Managing the R&D-marketing interface. Research Management 30 (1987) 38-43
18. Henke J.W., Krachenberg A.R., and Lyons T.F. Cross-functional teams: good concept, poor implementation. Journal of Product Innovation Management 10 (1993) 216-229
19. Hoegl M., and Gemuenden H.G. Teamwork quality and the success of innovative projects: a theoretical concept and empirical evidence. Organization Science 12 4 (2001) 435-449
20. Jackson P.W., and Messick S. The person, the product, and the response: conceptual problems in the assessment of creativity. Journal of Personality 33 September (1965) 309-329
21. Janssen O. The joint impact of perceived influence and supervisor supportiveness on employee innovative behaviour. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology 78 (2005) 573-579
22. Kahn K. Interdepartmental integration: a definition with implications for product development performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management 13 (1996) 137-151
23. Kahn K. Market orientation, interdepartmental integration, and product development performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (2001) 314-323
24. Kanter R.M. When a thousand flowers bloom: structural, collective, and social conditions for innovation in organizations. In: Staw B.M., and Cummings L.L. (Eds). Research in Organizational Behavior vol. 10 (1988), JAI Press, Greenwich, CT 97-102
25. Kratzer J., Leenders R.T.A.J., and Van Engelen J.M.L. Managing creative team performance in virtual environments: an empirical study in 44 R&D teams. Technovation 26 (2006) 42-49
26. Leavitt H.J. The old days, hot groups, and managers' lib. Administrative Science Quarterly 41 (1996) 288-300
27. Leavitt H.J., and Lipman-Blumen J. Hot groups. Harvard Business Review 73 (1995) 109-116
28. Lovelace K., Shapiro D.L., and Weingart L.R. Maximizing cross-functional new product teams' innovativeness and constraint adherence: a conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal 44 4 (2001) 779-793
29. Milliken F.J., and Martins L.L. Searching for common threads: understanding the multiple effects of diversity in organizational groups. Academy of Management Review 21 2 (1996) 402-423
30. Moenaert R.K., and Souder W.E. An information transfer model for integrating marketing and R&D personnel in NPD projects. Journal of Product Innovation Management 7 (1990) 91-107
31. Nonaka I., and Takeuchi H. Knowledge Creating Company (1995), Oxford University Press, New York
32. Olson E.M., Walker O.C., and Ruekert R.W. Organizing for effective new product development: the moderating role of product innovativeness. Journal of Marketing 59 (1995) 48-62
33. Olson E.M., Walker O.C., Ruekert R.W., and Bonner J.M. Patterns of cooperation during new product development among marketing, operations and R&D: implications for project performance. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (2001) 258-271
34. Pierce J.L., Rubenfeld S., and Morgan S. Employee ownership: a conceptual model of process and effects. Academy of Management Review 16 (1992) 121-144
35. Pinto M.B., Pinto J.K., and Prescott J.E. Antecedents and consequences of project team cross-functional cooperation. Management Science 39 (1993) 1281-1297
36. Sarin S., and Mahajan V. The effect of reward structures on the performance of cross-functional product development teams. Journal of Marketing 65 2 (2001) 35-53
37. Sethi R., and Nicholson C.Y. Structural and contextual correlates of charged behavior in product development teams. The Journal of Product Innovation Management 18 (2001) 154-168
38. Sethi R., Smith D.C., and Park C.W. Cross-functional product development teams, creativity, and the innovativeness of new consumer products. Journal of Marketing Research 38 1 (2001) 73-85
39. Simons T., Pelled L.H., and Smith K.A. Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal 42 (1999) 662-673
40. Song M.X., Xie J.H., and Dyer B. Antecedents and consequences of marketing managers' conflict-handling behaviors. Journal of Marketing 64 (2000) 55-66
41. Syamil A., Doll W.J., and Apigian C.H. Process performance in product development: measures and impacts. European Journal of Innovation Management 7 3 (2004) 205-217
42. Ulrich K.T., and Eppinger S.D. Product Design and Development (1995), McGraw-Hill, New York
43. Valle S., and Avella L. Cross-functionality and leadership of the new product development teams. European Journal of Innovation Management 6 1 (2003) 32-47
44. Van Engelen J.M.L., Kiewiet D.J., and Terlouw P. Improving performance of product development teams through managing polarity. International Studies of Management and Organization 31 (2001) 46-63