Bridging the gap between measurement models and theories of human memory

Journal of Psychology

Volumn 215, Issue 1, 2007, Pages 72-85

  Brandt, Martin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MANNHEIM   (Germany)

Author keywords

Global memory models; Multinomial modeling; Recognition memory

Indexed keywords

EID: 34548259398     PISSN: 00443409     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1027/0044-3409.215.1.72     Document Type: Article

References (73)

1. Anderson, J.R., Bothell, D., Lebiere, C., & Matessa, M. (1998). An integrated theory of list memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 38, 341-380.
2. Anisfeld, M., & Knapp, M. (1968). Association, synonymity, and directionality in false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 77, 171-179.
3. Arndt, J., & Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from a global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371-391.
4. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1990). Multinomial processing models of source monitoring. Psychological Review, 97, 548-564.
5. Batchelder, W.H., & Riefer, D.M. (1999). Theoretical and empirical review of multinomial process tree modeling. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 6, 57-86.
6. Bayen, U.J., Murnane, K., & Erdfelder, E. (1996). Source discrimination, item detection, and multinomial models of source monitoring. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 22, 197-215.
7. Brandt, M. (2001). Modellbasierte Analyse globaler Gedächtnismodelle. Theoretische Grundlagen, methodische Probleme und experimentelle Befunde. Lengerich: Pabst.
8. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., Steffens, M.C., & Martensen, H. (1997). The nature of memory processes underlying recognition judgments in the process dissociation procedure. Memory and Cognition, 25, 508-517.
9. Buchner, A., Erdfelder, E., & Vaterrodt Pluennecke, B. (1995). Toward unbiased measurement of conscious and unconscious memory processes within the process dissociation framework. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 137-160.
10. Clark, S.E., & Gronlund, S.D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 3, 37-60.
11. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
12. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
13. Dougherty, M.R.P., Gettys, C.F., & Ogden, E.E. (1999). MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood. Psychological Review, 106, 180-209.
14. Erdfelder, E. (2000). Multinomiale Modelle in der Kognitiven Psychologie. Unveröffentlichte Habilitationsschrift, Rheinische Friedrich-Wilhelms-Universität, Bonn.
15. Erdfelder, E., & Buchner, A. (1998). Decomposing the hindsight bias: A multinomial processing tree model for separating recollection and reconstruction in hindsight. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24, 387-414.
16. Erdfelder, E., Faul, F., & Buchner, A. (1996). GPOWER: A general power analysis program. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 28, 1-11.
17. Estes, W.K. (1975). Some targets for mathematical psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 12, 263-283.
18. Franks, J.J., & Bransford, J.D. (1971). Abstraction of visual patterns. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 90, 65-74.
19. Gillund, G., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1984). A retrieval model for both recognition and recall. Psychological Review, 91, 1-67.
20. Goldinger, S.D. (1998). Echoes of echoes? An episodic theory of lexical access. Psychological Review, 105, 251-279.
21. Gronlund, S.D., & Elam, L.E. (1994). List-length effect: Recognition accuracy and variance of underlying distributions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1355-1369.
22. Hicks, J.L., & Starns, J.J. (2006). Remembering source evidence from associatively related items: Explanations from a global matching model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 32, 1164-1173.
23. Hintzman, D.L. (1984). MINERVA 2: A simulation model of human memory. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 16, 96-101.
24. Hintzman, D.L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
25. Hintzman, D.L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
26. Hintzman, D.L. (1991). Why are formal models useful in psychology? In W.E. Hockley & S. Lewandowsky (Eds.), Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (pp. 39-56). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
27. Hintzman, D.L. (2001). Similarity, global matching, and judgments of frequency. Memory and Cognition, 29, 547-556.
28. Hintzman, D.L., Curran, T., & Oppy, B. (1992). Effects of similarity and repetition on memory: Registration without learning? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 667-680.
29. Hintzman, D.L., & Hartry, A.L. (1990). Commensurability in memory for frequency. Journal of Memory and Language, 29, 501-523.
30. Hu, X. (1999). Multinomial processing tree models: An implementation. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 689-695.
31. Hu, X., & Batchelder, W.H. (1994). The statistical analysis of general processing tree models with the EM algorithm. Psychometrika, 59, 21-47.
32. Humphreys, M.S., Bain, J.D., & Pike, R. (1989). Different ways to cue a coherent memory system: A theory for episodic, semantic, and procedural tasks. Psychological Review, 96, 208-233.
33. Humphreys, M.S., Pike, R., Bain, J.D., & Tehan, G. (1989). Global matching: A comparison of the SAM, Minerva II, Matrix, and TODAM models. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 33, 36-67.
34. Jacoby, L.L. (1991). A process dissociation framework: Separating automatic from intentional uses of memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 30, 513-541.
35. Jones, C.M., & Heit, E. (1993). An evaluation of the total similarity principle: Effects of similarity on frequency judgments. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 799-812.
36. Klauer, K.C., & Wegener, I. (1998). Unraveling social categorization in the "Who said what?" paradigm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75, 1155-1178.
37. Lewandowsky, S., & Heit, E. (2006). Some targets for memory models. Journal of Memory and Language, 55, 441-446.
38. Macmillan, N.A., & Creelman, CD. (1991). Detection theory: A user's guide. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
39. Mandler, G. (1980). Recognizing: The judgment of previous occurrence. Psychological Review, 87, 252-271.
40. McClelland, J.L., & Chappell, M. (1998). Familiarity breeds differentiation: A subjective-likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review, 105, 734-760.
41. Meiser, T., & Broder, A. (2002). Memory for multidimensional source information. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 28, 116-137.
42. Metcalfe-Eich, J.M. (1982). A composite holographic associative recall model. Psychological Review, 89, 627-661.
43. Murdock, B.B. (1982). A theory for the storage and retrieval of item and associative information. Psychological Review, 89, 609-626.
44. Murdock, B.B. (1997). Context and mediators in a theory of distributed associative memory (TODAM2). Psychological Review, 104, 839-862.
45. Murdock, B.B., & Kahana, M.J. (1993). Analysis of the list-strength effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 689-697.
46. Nelder, J.A., & Mead, R. (1965). A simplex method for function minimization. Computer Journal, 7, 308-313.
47. Payne, D.G., Elie, C.J., Blackwell, J.M., & Neuschatz, J.S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 261-285.
48. Pike, R. (1984). Comparison of convolution and matrix distributed memory systems for associative recall and recognition. Psychological Review, 91, 281-294.
49. Posner, M.I., & Keele, S.W. (1970). Retention of abstract ideas. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 83, 304-308.
50. Raaijmakers, J.G., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1980). SAM: A theory of probabilistic search of associative memory. In G.H. Bower (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation (Vol. 14, pp. 207-262). New York: Academic Press.
51. Raaijmakers, J.G., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1981). Search of associative memory. Psychological Review, 88, 93-134.
52. Ratcliff, R., Clark, S.E., & Shiffrin, R.M. (1990). List-strength effect: I. Data and discussion. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 163-178.
53. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single-process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 352-374.
54. Riefer, D.M., & Batchelder, W.H. (1988). Multinomial modeling and the measurement of cognitive processes. Psychological Review, 95, 318-339.
55. Roediger, H.L., & McDermott, K.B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
56. Rotello, CM. (2001). Recall processes in recognition memory. In D.L. Medin (Ed.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory (pp. 183-221). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
57. Rothkegel, R. (1999). AppleTree: A multinomial processing tree modeling program for Macintosh computers. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers, 31, 696-700.
58. Schulman, A.I. (1974). The declining course of recognition memory. Memory and Cognition, 2, 14-18.
59. Sheu, C.F. (1992). A note on the multiple-trace memory model without simulation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 36, 592-597.
60. Shiffrin, R.M., Ratcliff, R., & Clark, S.E. (1990). List-strength effect: II. Theoretical mechanisms. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 16, 179-195.
61. Shiffrin, R.M., & Steyvers, M. (1997). A model for recognition memory: REM-retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 4, 145-166.
62. Smith, E.R. (1991). Illusory correlation in a simulated exemplarbased memory. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 27, 107-123.
63. Smith, R.E., & Bayen, U.J. (2004). A multinomial model of eventbased prospective memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 30, 756-777.
64. Smith, R.E., & Bayen, U.J. (2005). The effects of working memory resource availability on prospective memory: A formal modeling approach. Experimental Psychology, 52, 243-256.
65. Snodgrass, J.G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
66. Stahl, C., & Klauer, K.C. (in press). HMMTree: A computer program for latent-class hierachical processing tree models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments and Computers.
67. Steffens, M.C., Buchner, A., Martensen, H., & Erdfelder, E. (2000). Further evidence on the similarity of memory processes in the process dissociation procedure and in source monitoring. Memory and Cognition, 28, 1152-1164.
68. Strange, W., Keeney, T., Kessel, F.S., & Jenkins, J.J. (1970). Abstraction over time of prototypes from distortions of random dot patterns: A replication. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 85, 508-510.
69. Strong, E.K.J. (1912). The effect of length of series upon recognition memory. Psychological Review, 19, 447-462.
70. Yonelinas, A.P. (1994). Receiver-operating characteristics in recognition memory: Evidence for a dual-process model. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 20, 1341-1354.
71. Yonelinas, A.P. (2002). The nature of recollection and familiarity: A review of 30 years of research. Journal of Memory and Language, 46, 441-517.
72. Yonelinas, A.P., Hockley, W.E., & Murdock, B.B. (1992). Tests of the list-strength effect in recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 345-355.
73. Zaki, S.R., & Nosofsky, R.M. (2001). Exemplar accounts of blending and distinctiveness effects in perceptual old-new recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 1022-1041.