Remembering source evidence from associatively related items: Explanations from a global matching model

Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition

Volumn 32, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 1164-1173

  Hicks, Jason L ^a   Starns, Jeffrey J ^a  

^a LOUISIANA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Associative strength; Global matching methods; MINERVA 2; Relatedness effect; Source memory

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; LEARNING; MALE; MEMORY; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; REACTION TIME;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ASSOCIATION LEARNING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; MEMORY; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; PRACTICE (PSYCHOLOGY); REACTION TIME;

EID: 33748415883     PISSN: 02787393     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1037/0278-7393.32.5.1164     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Arndt, J., & Hirshman, E. (1998). True and false recognition in MINERVA2: Explanations from the global matching perspective. Journal of Memory and Language, 39, 371-391.
2. Clark, S. E., & Gronland, S. D. (1996). Global matching models of recognition memory: How the models match the data. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 3, 37-60.
3. Criss, A. H., & Shiffrin, R. M. (2004). Context noise and item noise jointly determine recognition memory: A comment on Dennis and Humphreys (2001). Psychological Review, 111, 800-807.
4. Deese, J. (1959). On the prediction of occurrence of particular verbal intrusions in immediate recall. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 58, 17-22.
5. Dennis, S., & Humphreys, M. S. (2001). A context noise model of episodic word recognition. Psychological Review, 108, 452-478.
6. Dodhia, R. M., & Metcalfe, J. (1999). False memories and source monitoring. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 16, 489-508.
7. E-prime [Computer software], (2002). Pittsburgh, PA: Psychology Software Tools.
8. Gallo, D. A., McDermott, K. B., Percer, J. M., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2001). Modality effects in false recall and false recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 27, 339-353.
9. Gallo, D. A., & Roediger, H. L., III. (2003). The effects of associations and aging on illusory recollections. Memory & Cognition, 31, 1036-1044.
10. Geraci, L., & Franklin, N. (2004). The influence of linguistic labels on source-monitoring decisions. Memory, 12, 571-585.
11. Henkel, L. A. (2004). Erroneous memories arising from repeated attempts to remember. Journal of Memory and Language, 50, 26-46.
12. Henkel, L. A., & Franklin, N. (1998). Reality monitoring of physically similar and conceptually related objects. Memory & Cognition, 26, 659-673.
13. Hicks, J. L., & Hancock, T. W. (2002). Backward associative strength determines source attributions given to false memories. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9, 807-815.
14. Hicks, J. L., & Starns, J. J. (2006). The roles of associative strength and source memorability in the contextualization of false memory. Journal of Memory and Language, 54, 39-53.
15. Hintzman, D. L. (1986). "Schema abstraction" in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 93, 411-428.
16. Hintzman, D. L. (1988). Judgments of frequency and recognition memory in a multiple-trace memory model. Psychological Review, 95, 528-551.
17. Johnson, M. K., Hashtroudi, S., & Lindsay, D. S. (1993). Source monitoring. Psychological Bulletin, 114, 3-28.
18. Lampinen, J. M., Neuschatz, J. S., & Payne, D. G. (1999). Source attributions and false memories: A test of the demand characteristics account. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 6, 130-135.
19. Mather, M., Henkel, L. A., & Johnson, M. K. (1997). Evaluating characteristics of false memories: Remember/know judgments and memory characteristics questionnaire compared. Memory & Cognition, 25, 826-837.
20. Metcalfe, J. (1990). Composite holographic associative recall model (CHARM) and blended memories in eyewitness testimony. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 119, 145-160.
21. Nelson, D. L., McEvoy, C. L., & Schreiber, T. A. (1998). The University of South Florida word association, rhyme, and word fragment norms. Retrieved January 23, 2004, from http://www.usf.edu/FreeAssociation/
22. Payne, D. G., Elie, C. J., Blackwell, J. M., & Neuschatz, F. S. (1996). Memory illusions: Recalling, recognizing, and recollecting events that never occurred. Journal of Memory and Language, 35, 261-285.
23. Ratcliff, R., Van Zandt, T., & McKoon, G. (1995). Process dissociation, single process theories, and recognition memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 353-374.
24. Roediger, H. L., III, & McDermott, K. B. (1995). Creating false memories: Remembering words not presented in lists. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 21, 803-814.
25. Roediger, H. L., III, McDermott, K. B., & Pisoni, D. B. (2004). Illusory recollection of voices. Memory, 12, 586-602.
26. Snodgrass, J. G., & Corwin, J. (1988). Pragmatics of measuring recognition memory: Applications to dementia and amnesia. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 117, 34-50.
27. Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1-25.
28. Underwood, B. J. (1965). False recognition produced by implicit verbal responses. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70, 122-129.
29. Wickens, T. D. (2002). Elementary signal detection theory. New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Yonelinas, A. P. (1999). The contribution of recollection and familiarity to recognition and source-memory judgments: A formal dual-process model and an analysis of receiver operating characteristics. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 25, 1415-1434.