Some targets for memory models

Journal of Memory and Language

Volumn 55, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 441-446

  Lewandowsky, Stephan ^a   Heit, Evan ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WESTERN AUSTRALIA   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750042276     PISSN: 0749596X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jml.2006.08.006     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Anderson J.R., and Lebiere C. The atomic components of thought (1998), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
2. Brown, G.D.A., Neath, I., Chater, N. (2002). SIMPLE: A local distinctiveness model of scale invariant memory and perceptual identification. Unpublished manuscript.
3. Burgess N., and Hitch G. Toward a network model of the articulatory loop. Journal of Memory and Language 31 (1992) 429-460
4. Burgess N., and Hitch G. Memory for serial order: a network model of the phonological loop and its timing. Psychological Review 106 (1999) 551-581
5. Conway A.R.A., Kane M.J., and Engle R.W. Working memory capacity and its relation to general intelligence. Trends in Cognitive Science 7 (2003) 547-552
6. Estes W.K. Some targets for mathematical psychology. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 12 (1975) 263-282
7. Estes W.K. Classification and cognition (1994), Oxford University Press, New York/Oxford
8. Estes W.K., and Maddox W.T. Risks of drawing inferences about cognitive processes from model fits to individual versus average performance. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 12 (2005) 403-408
9. Farrell S., and Lewandowsky S. An endogenous distributed model of ordering in serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9 (2002) 59-79
10. Gronlund S.D., and Ratcliff R. Time course of item and associative information: implications for global memory models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 15 (1989) 846-858
11. Heit E., and Hayes B.K. Relations among categorization, induction, recognition, and similarity. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 134 (2005) 596-605
12. Heit, E., Rotello, C.M. (2005). Are there two kinds of reasoning? Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, 923-928. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
13. Hockley W.E. Analysis of response time distributions in the study of cognitive processes. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 10 (1984) 598-615
14. Johnson H.M., and Seifert C.M. Sources of the continued influence effect: when misinformation in memory affects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition 20 (1994) 1420-1436
15. Lewandowsky S., Duncan M., and Brown G.D.A. Time does not cause forgetting in short-term serial recall. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 11 (2004) 771-790
16. Lewandowsky S., and Hockley W.E. Relating theory and data: Towards an integration. In: Hockley W.E., and Lewandowsky S. (Eds). Relating theory and data: Essays on human memory in honor of Bennet B. Murdock (1991), Lawrence Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ 3-20
17. Lewandowsky S., Stritzke W.G.K., Oberauer K., and Morales M. Memory for fact, fiction, and misinformation: the Iraq War 2003. Psychological Science 16 (2005) 190-195
18. Li S.-C., Lewandowsky S., and DeBrunner V.E. Using parameter sensitivity and interdependence to predict model scope and falsifiability. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 125 (1996) 360-369
19. Loftus G.R. Analysis, interpretation, and visual presentation of data. Stevens' handbook of experimental psychology. 3rd ed. (2001), John Wiley, New York
20. McClelland J.L., and Chappell M. Familiarity breeds differentiation: a subjective likelihood approach to the effects of experience in recognition memory. Psychological Review 105 (1998) 734-760
21. Murdock B.B. Human memory: Theory and data (1974), Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ
22. Myung I.J. The importance of complexity in model selection. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 44 (2000) 190-204
23. Myung I.J. Tutorial on maximum likelihood estimation. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 47 (2003) 90-100
24. Navarro D.J., Pitt M.A., and Myung I.J. Assessing the distinguishability of models and the informativeness of data. Cognitive Psychology 49 (2004) 47-84
25. Nosofsky R.M. Exemplar-based accounts of relations between classification, recognition, and typicality. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 14 (1988) 700-708
26. Nosofsky R.M., Palmeri T.J., and McKinley S.C. Rule-plus-exception model of classification learning. Psychological Review 101 (1994) 53-79
27. Nosofsky R.M., and Zaki S.R. Dissociations between categorization and recognition in amnesic and normal individuals: an exemplar-based interpretation. Psychological Science 9 (1998) 247-255
28. Pitt M.A., Kim W., and Myung I.J. Flexibility vs. generalizability in model selection. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 10 (2003) 29-44
29. Ratcliff R., and Murdock B.B. Retrieval processes in recognition memory. Psychological Review 83 (1976) 190-214
30. Rumelhart, D.E., McClelland, J.L., and the PDP Research Group. (1986). Parallel distributed processing: Explorations in the microstructure of cognition, vols. 1 and 2. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
31. Shiffrin R.M. Modeling memory and perception. Cognitive Science 27 (2003) 341-378
32. Shiffrin R.M., and Steyvers M. A model for recognition memory: REM-Retrieving effectively from memory. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 4 (1997) 145-166
33. Stanovich K.E. Who is rational? Studies of individual differences in reasoning (1999), Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ
34. Yang L.-X., and Lewandowsky S. Knowledge partitioning in categorization: constraints on exemplar models. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 30 (2004) 1045-1064