Simulating protein motions with rigidity analysis

Journal of Computational Biology

Volumn 14, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 839-855

  Thomas, Shawna ^a   Tang, Xinyu ^a   Tapia, Lydia ^a   Amato, Nancy M ^a  

^a TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Motion planning; Protein folding; Rigidity analysis

Indexed keywords

CALMODULIN; MUTANT PROTEIN; PROTEIN; PROTEIN G; PROTEIN NUG1; PROTEIN NUG2; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CALCIUM BINDING; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONFORMATIONAL TRANSITION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN BINDING; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN FUNCTION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; RIGIDITY; SIMULATION; VALIDATION STUDY;

CALMODULIN; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GTP-BINDING PROTEINS; MODELS, MOLECULAR; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, SECONDARY; THERMODYNAMICS;

EID: 34547699008     PISSN: 10665277     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1089/cmb.2007.R019     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (68)

1. Akiyama, S., Takahashi, S., Ishimori, K., et al. 2000. Stepwise formation of alpha-helices during cytochrome c folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 443-445.
2. Alm, E., and Baker, D. 1999. Prediction of protein-folding mechanisms from free-energy landscapes derived from native structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11305-11310.
3. Amato, N.M., Dill, K.A., and Song, G. 2003. Using motion planning to map protein folding landscapes and analyze folding kinetics of known native structures. J. Comput. Biol. 10, 239-256.
4. Amato, N.M., and Song, G. 2002. Using motion planning to study protein folding pathways. J. Comput. Biol. 90, 149-168.
5. Apaydin, M., Brutlag, D., Guestrin, C., et al. 2002. Stochastic roadmap simulation: An efficient representation and algorithm for analyzing molecular motion. RECOMB 2002, 12-21.
6. Apaydin, M., Singh, A., Brutlag, D., et al. 2001. Capturing molecular energy landscapes with probabilistic conformational roadmaps. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 932-939.
7. Baker, D. 2000. A surprising simplicity to protein folding. Nature 405, 39-42.
8. Bayazit, O.B., Song, G., and Amato, N.M. 2001. Ligand binding with OBPRM and haptic user input: enhancing automatic motion planning with virtual touch. Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. Robot. Autom., 954-959.
9. Berman, H., Westbrook, J., Feng, Z., et al. 2000. The protein data bank. Nucleic Acids Res. 28, 235-242.
10. Boutonnet, N., Rooman, M., and Wodak, S. 1995. Automatic analysis of protein conformational changes by multiple linkage clustering. J. Mol. Biol. 253, 633-647.
11. Bryngelson, J., Onuchic, J., Socci, N., et al. 1995. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Protein Struct. Funct. Genet. 21, 167-195.
12. Case. D. 1999. Molecular dynamics and normal mode analysis of biomolecular rigidity, 329-344. In: Thorpe, M., and Duxbury, P., eds. Rigidity Theory and Applications. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers, New York.
13. Chiang, T.-H., Hsu, D., Apaydin, M.S., et al. 2006. Predicting experimental quantities in protein folding kinetics using stochastic roadmap simulation. RECOMB 2006, 410-424.
14. Cortes, J., Simeon, T., Remaud-Simeon, M., et al. 2004. Geometric algorithms for the conformational analysis of long protein loops. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 956-967.
15. Covell, D. 1992. Folding protein α-carbon chains into compact forms by Monte Carlo methods. Prot. Struct. Funct. Genet. 14, 409-420.
16. Daggett, V., and Levitt, M. 1993. Realistic simulation of naive-protein dynamics in solution and beyond. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 22, 353-380.
17. Das, P., Matysiak, S., and Clementi, C. 2005. Balancing energy and entropy: a minimalist model for the characterization of protein folding landscapes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 10141-10146.
18. Dill, K.A., Bromberg, S., Yue, K., et al. 1995. Principles of protein folding-a perspective from simple exact models. Protein Sci. 4, 561-602.
19. Duan, Y., and Kollman, P. 1998. Pathways to a protein folding intermediate observed in a 1-microsecond simulation in aqueous solution. Science 282, 740-744.
20. Echols, N., Milburn, D., and Gerstein, M. 2003. Molmovdb: analysis and visualization of conformational change and structural flexibility. Nucleic Acids Res. 31, 478-482.
21. Evans, P.A., and Radford, S.E. 1994. Probing the structure of folding intermediates. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 4, 100-106.
22. Gerstein, M., and Krebs, W. 1998. A database of macromolecular motions. Nucleic Acids Res. 26, 4280-4290.
23. Go, N. 1983. Theoretical studies of protein folding. Ann. Rev. Biophys. Bioeng. 12, 183-210.
24. Haile, J. 1992. Molecular Dynamics Simulation: Elementary Methods. Wiley, New York.
25. Hespenheide, B.M., Rader, A., Thorpe, M., et al. 2002. Identifying protein folding cores from the evolution of flexible regions during unfolding. J. Mol. Gra. Model. 21, 195-207.
26. Jacobs, D. 1998. Generic rigidity in three-dimensional bond-bending networks. J. Phys. A Math. Gen. 31, 6653-6668.
27. Jacobs, D., and Thorpe, M. 1995. Generic rigidity percolation: the pebble game. Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 4051-4054.
28. Jacobs, D.J., Rader, A., Kuhn, L.A., et al. 2001. Protein flexiblility predictions using graph theory. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 44, 150-165.
29. Janin, J., and Wodak, S. 1983. Structural domains in proteins and their role in the dynamics of protein function. Prog. Biophys. Mol. Biol. 42, 21-78.
30. Karplus, P., and Schulz, G. 1985. Prediction of chain flexibility in proteins. Naturwissencschaften 72, 212-213.
31. Kavraki, L.E., Svestka, P., Latombe, J.C., et al. 1996. Probabilistic roadmaps for path planning in high-dimensional configuration spaces. IEEE Trans. Robot. Automat. 12, 566-580.
32. Kay, L.E., Torchia, D.A., and Bax, A. 1989. Backbone dynamics of proteins as studied by nitrogen-15 inverse detected heteronuclear NMR spectroscopy: application to staphylococcal nuclease. Biochemistry 28, 8972-8979.
33. Keskin, O., Jernigan, R., and Bahar, I. 2000. Proteins with similar architecture exhibit similar large-scale dynamic behavior. Biophys. J. 78, 2093-2106.
34. Kim, D.E., Fisher, D.E., and Baker, D. 2000. A breakdown of symmetry in the folding transition state of protein 1. J. Mol. Biol. 298, 971-984.
35. Kolinski, A., and Skolnick, J. 1994. Monte Carlo simulations of protein folding. Proteins Struct. Funct. Genet. 18, 338-352.
36. Krivov, S.V., and Karplus, M. 2002. Free energy disconnectivity graphs: application to peptide models. J. Chem. Phys. 114, 10894-10903.
37. Lei, M., Zavodszky, M.I., Kuhn, L.A., et al. 2004. Sampling protein conformations and pathways. J. Comput. Chem. 25, 1133-1148.
38. Levitt, M. 1983. Protein folding by restrained energy minimization and molecular dynamics. J. Mol. Biol. 170, 723-764.
39. Levitt, M., and Warshel, A. 1975. Computer simulation of protein folding. Nature 253, 694-698.
40. Li, R., and Woodward, C. 1999. The hydrogen exchange core and protein folding. Protein Sci. 8, 1571-1591.
41. Ma, J., and Karplus, M. 1998. The allosteric mechanism of the chaperonin groel: a dynamic analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8502-8507.
42. Maiorov, V., and Abagyan, R. 1997. A new method for modeling large-scale rearrangements of protein domains. Proteins 27, 410-424.
43. Matysiak, S., and Clementi, C. 2004. Optimal combination of theory and experiment for the characterization of the protein folding landscape of s6: how far can a minimalist model go? J. Mol. Biol. 343, 235-248.
44. McCallister, E.L., Alm, E., and Baker, D. 2000. Critical role of β-hairpin formation in protein g folding. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7, 669-673.
45. Mittermaier, A., and Kay, L.E. 2006. New tools provide new insights in NMR studies of protein dynamics. Science 312, 224-228.
46. Muñoz, V., and Eaton, W.A. 1999. A simple model for calculating the kinetics of protein folding from three dimensional structures. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 11311-11316.
47. Muñoz, V., Henry, E.R., Hoferichter, J., et al. 1998. A statistical mechanical model for β-hairpin kinetics. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 5872-5879.
48. Nauli, S., Kuhlman, B., and Baker, D. 2001. Computer-based redesign of a protein folding pathway. Nature Struct. Biol. 8, 602-605.
49. Nichols, W., Rose, G., Eyck, L.T., et al. 1995. Rigid domains in proteins: an algorithmic approach to their identification. Proteins 23, 38-48.
50. Palmer, A.G., Kroenke, C.D., and Loria, J.P. 2001. Nuclear magnetic resonance methods for quantifying microsecond-to-millisecond motions in biological macromolecules. Methods Enzymol. 339, 204-238.
51. Prusiner, S. 1998. Prions. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 13363-13383.
52. Rader, A., Hespenheide, B.M., Kuhn, L.A., et al. 2002. Protein unfolding: rigidity lost. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 3540-3545.
53. Ren, Z., Perman, B., Srajer, V., et al. 2001. A molecular movie at 1.8 A resolution displays the photocycle of photoactive yellow protein, a eubacterial blue-light receptor, from nanoseconds to seconds. Biochemistry 40, 13788-13801.
54. Roder, H., Maki, K., and Cheng, H. 2006. Early events in protein folding explored by rapid mixing methods. Chem. Rev. 106, 1836-1861.
55. Singh, A., Latombe, J., and Brutlag, D. 1999. A motion planning approach to flexible ligand binding. 7th Int. Conf. Intell. Syst. Mol. Biol., 252-261.
56. Song, G. 2004. A motion planning approach to protein folding [Ph.D. dissertation]. Dept. of Computer Science, Texas A&M University.
57. Song, G., Thomas, S., Dill, K., et al. 2003. A path planning-based study of protein folding with a case study of hairpin formation in protein G and L. Proc. Pacific Symp. Biocomput., 240-251.
58. Srajer, V., Ren, Z., Teng, T.-Y., et al. 2001. Protein conformational relaxation and ligand migration in myoglobin: a nanosecond to millisecond molecular movie from time-resolved Laue x-ray diffraction. Biochemistry 40, 13802-13815.
59. Sternberg, M.J. 1996. Protein Structure Prediction. OIRL Press at Oxford University Press, Oxford, UK.
60. Sun, S., Thomas, P.D., and Dill, K.A. 1995. A simple protein folding algorithm using a binary code and secondary structure constraints. Protein Eng. 8, 769-778.
61. Tang, X., Kirkpatrick, B., Thomas, S., et al. 2005. Using motion planning to study RNA folding kinetics. J. Comput. Biol. 12, 862-881.
62. Thomas, S., Tang, X., Tapia, L., et al. 2006. Simulating protein motions with rigidity analysis. RECOMB 2006, 394-409.
63. Tung, C.S., Harvey, S.C., and McCammon, J.A. 1984. Large-amplitude bending motions in phenylalaine transfer RNA. Biopolymers 23, 2173.
64. Wales, T.E., and Engen, J.R. 2006. Hydrogen exchange mass spectrometry for the analysis of protein dynamics. Mass Spec. Rev. 25, 158-170.
65. Wells, S., Menor, S., Hespenheide, B., and Thorpe, M.F. 2005. Constrained geometric simulation of diffusive motion in proteins. Phys. Biol. 2, S127-S136.
66. Whiteley, W. 1996. Some matroids from discrete applied geometry. Contemp. Math. 197, 171-311.
67. Xie, D., Morales, M., Pearce, R., et al. 2006. Incremental map generation (IMG). Proc. Int. Workshop Algorithmic Found. Robotics.
68. Zuckerman, D.M. 2004. Simulation of and ensemble of conformational transitions in a united-residue model of calmodulin. J. Phys. Chem. 108, 5127-5137.