Assessment-based instructional coaching provided to reading intervention teachers

Reading and Writing

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2007, Pages 569-590

  Denton, Carolyn A ^a   Swanson, Elizabeth A ^a   Mathes, Patricia G ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b SOUTHERN METHODIST UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Collaboration; High risk students; Mentoring; Professional development; Reading assessment; Reading coach; Reading intervention; Technology

Indexed keywords

EID: 34547213474     PISSN: 09224777     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11145-007-9055-0     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Bahr, M. W., & Kovaleski, J. F. (2006). The need for problem-solving teams. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 2-5.
2. Bean, R. M., Swan, A. L., & Knaub, R. (2003). Reading specialists in schools with exemplary reading programs: Functional, versatile, and prepared. The Reading Teacher, 56, 446-455.
3. Chard, D. J. (2004). Toward a science of professional development in early reading instruction. Exceptionality, 12, 175-191.
4. Conte, K. L., & Hintze, J. M. (2000). The effects of performance feedback and goal setting on oral reading fluency within curriculum-based measurement. Diagnostique, 25(2), 85-98.
5. Denton, C. A., Foorman, B. R., & Mathes, P. M. (2003). Schools that "beat the odds": Implications for reading instruction. Remedial and Special Education, 24, 258-261.
6. Denton, C. A., Hasbrouck, J. H., & Sekaquaptewa, S. (2003). The consulting teacher: A case study in Responsive Systems Consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 14, 41-73.
7. Denton, C. A., & Hocker, J. K. (2006). Responsive reading instruction: flexible intervention for struggling readers in the early grades. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
8. Denton, C. A., & Mathes, P. G. (2003). Intervention for struggling readers: Possibilities and challenges. In B. R. Foorman (Ed.), Preventing and remediating reading difficulties: Bringing science to scale. (pp. 229-251). Timonium, MD: York Press.
9. Denton, C. A., Swanson, E. A., Mathes, P. G., Jia, Y., & Shih, M. (April, 2007). Student outcomes and response to "tier 2" reading intervention scaled up in multiple schools. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.
10. Dole, J. (2004). The changing role of the reading specialist in school reform. The Reading Teacher, 57, 462-471.
11. Engelmann, S. (1999). Student-program alignment and teaching to mastery. Paper presented at the 25th national direct instruction conference, Eugene, OR.
12. Evans, S. B. (1991). A realistic look at the research base for collaboration in special education. Preventing School Failure, 35, 10-13.
13. Foorman, B. R., Schatschneider, C., Eakin, M. N., Fletcher, J. M., Moats, L. C., & Francis, D. J. (2006). The impact of instructional practices in grades 1 and 2 on reading and spelling achievement in high poverty schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31, 1-29.
14. Fuchs, L. S., Deno, S. L., & Mirkin, P. K. (1984). Effects of frequent curriculum-based measurement and evaluation on pedagogy, student achievement, and student awareness of learning. American Educational Research Journal, 21, 449-460.
15. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Allinder, R. M. (1991). The contribution of skills analysis to curriculum-based measurement in spelling. Exceptional Children, 57, 443-452.
16. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., & Stecker, P. M. (1991). Effects of curriculum-based measurement and consultation on teacher planning and student achievement in mathematics operations. American Educational Research Journal, 28, 617-641.
17. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C. L., Walz, L., & Germann, G. (1993). Formative evaluation of academic progress: How much growth can we expect? School Psychology Review, 22, 27-48.
18. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915-945.
19. Gravois, T. A., & Rosenfeld, S. A. (2006). Impact of instructional consultation teams on the disproportionate referral and placement of minority students in special education. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 42-52.
20. Hasbrouck, J. E., & Denton, C. A. (2005). The reading coach: A how-to manual for success. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.
21. Idol, L. (1993). Special educator's consultation handbook (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.
22. International Reading Association (2004). The role and qualifications of the reading coach in the United States: A position statement of the International Reading Association. Newark, DE: International Reading Association. http://www.reading.org/resources/issues/positions_coach.html Accessed 01.03.2006.
23. Klingner, J. K. (2004). The science of professional development. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 37, 248-255.
24. Kovaleski, J. F., & Glew, M. C. (2006). Bringing instructional support teams to scale: Implications of the Pennsylvania experience. Remedial and Special Education, 27, 16-25.
25. MacLeod, I. R., Jones, K. M., Somers, C. L., & Havey, J. M. (2001). An evaluation of the effectiveness of school-based behavioral consultation. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 12, 203-216.
26. Mathes, P. G., & Denton, C. A. (2002). The prevention and identification of reading disability. Seminars in Pediatric Neurology, 9(3), 185-191.
27. Mathes, P. G., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., Anthony, J. L., Francis, D. J., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148-182.
28. Mathes, P. G., Torgesen, J. K, Menchetti, J. C., Wahl, M., & Grek, M. K. (1999). Proactive beginning reading. (Available from P. G. Mathes, Institute for Reading Research, Southern Methodist University, Dallas, TX).
29. National Reading Panel (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. Washington, DC: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development.
30. Perie, M., Grigg, W. S., & Donahue, P. L. (2005). The nation's report card: Reading 2005 (NCES 2006-451). Washington, DC: Department of Education Institute of Education Sciences.
31. Poglinco, S. M., & Bach, A. J. (2004). The heart of the matter: Coaching as a vehicle for professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 85, 398-400.
32. Safran, S. P., & Safran, J. S. (1996). Intervention assistance programs and prereferral teams. Remedial & Special Education, 17, 363-369.
33. Sheridan, S., Welch, M., & Orme, S. (1996). Is consultation effective? A review of outcome research. Remedial and Special Education, 17, 341-354.
34. Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53, 12-16.
35. Snow, C. E., Burns, M. S., & Griffin, P. (1998). Preventing reading difficulties in young children. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
36. Sugai, G. M., & Tindal, G. A. (1993). Effective school consultation: An interactive approach. Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
37. Tilly, W. D. (2006). Diagnosing the learning enabled: The promise of response to intervention. Perspectives, 32(1), 1, 4-7.
38. Torgesen, J. (2004). Lessons learned from research on interventions for students who have difficulty learning to read. In P. McCardle, & V. Chhabra (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355-382). Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes.
39. Vaughn, S., & Coleman, M. (2004). The role of mentoring in promoting research-based practices in reading. Remedial and Special Education, 25, 25-38.
40. Ysseldyke, J. E. (2001). Reflections on a research career: Generalizations from 25 years of research on assessment and instructional decision making. Exceptional Children, 67, 295-309.