Fracture strength after dynamic loading of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post-and-core systems

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 87, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 438-445

  Heydecke, Guido ^a,b,c   Butz, Frank ^a,b   Hussein, Amr ^a,b   Strub, Jörg R ^a,b,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FREIBURG   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN SCHOOL OF DENTISTRY   (United States)

^d Department of Prosthodontics ^*  (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GOLD; RESIN CEMENT; TITANIUM; ZIRCONIUM OXIDE; GOLD ALLOY; RESIN; ZIRCONIUM;

ARTICLE; CERAMIC PROSTHESIS; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; COMPUTER SYSTEM; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENDODONTICS; FISHER EXACT TEST; HIGH TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; HUMAN; HUMAN TISSUE; INCISOR; KRUSKAL WALLIS TEST; LOW TEMPERATURE PROCEDURES; MASTICATION; MAXILLA; PROSTHESIS FAILURE; SIMULATOR; STRENGTH; SURVIVAL RATE; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS; TOOTH ROOT CANAL; VELOCITY; CERAMICS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; MATERIALS TESTING; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

CERAMICS; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; HUMANS; INCISOR; MASTICATION; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; RANDOM ALLOCATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; TITANIUM; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL; ZIRCONIUM;

EID: 0036549318     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2002.123849     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Leempoel PJ, Eschen S, De Haan AF, Van't Hof MA. An evaluation of crowns and bridges in a general dental practice. J Oral Rehabil 1985;12:515-28.
2. Robbins JW, Earnest LA, Schumann SD. Fracture resistance of endodontically-treated cuspids. Am J Dent 1993;6:159-61.
3. Libman WJ, Nicholls JI. Load fatigue of teeth restored with cast posts and cores and complete crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:155-61.
4. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-36.
5. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE, editors. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. Chicago: Quintessence; 1997. p. 181-209.
6. Bergman B, Lundquist P, Sjogren U, Sundquist G. Restorative and endodontic results after treatment with cast posts and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:10-5.
7. Creugers NH, Mentink AG, Kayser AF. An analysis of durability data on post and core restorations. J Dent 1993;21:281-4.
8. Kayser AF, Leempoel PJ, Snoek PA. The metal post and composite core combination. J Oral Rehabil 1987;14:3-11.
9. Mentink AG, Creugers NH, Meeuwissen R, Leempoel PJ, Kayser AF. Clinical performance of different post and core systems - results of a pilot study. J Oral Rehabil 1993;20:577-84.
10. Linde LA. The use of composites as core material in root-filled teeth. II. Clinical investigation. Swed Dent J 1984;8:209-16.
11. Kern M, Simon MHP, Strub JR. [Preliminary clinical experience with zirconia posts]. Dtsch Zahnärztl Z 1998;53:266-8. German.
12. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:5-9.
13. Mannocci F, Ferrari M, Watson TF. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using quartz fiber, carbon-quartz fiber, and zirconium dioxide ceramic root canal posts. J Adhes Dent 1999;1:153-8.
14. Butz F, Lennon A, Heydecke G, Strub JR. Survival rate and fracture strength of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with moderate defects restored with different post and core systems. An in-vitro study. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:58-64.
15. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: an in-vitro study. J Dent 2001;29:427-33.
16. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-11.
17. Zalkind M, Hochman N. Direct core buildup using a preformed crown and prefabricated zirconium oxide post. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:730-2.
18. Sorensen JA, Mito WT. Rationale and clinical technique for esthetic restoration of endodontically treated teeth with the Cosmopost and IPS Empress post system. Quintessence Dental Technol 1998;12:81-90.
19. Plasmans PJ, Visseren LG, Vrijhoef MM, Kayser AF. In vitro comparison of dowel and core techniques for endodontically treated molars. J Endod 1986;12:382-7.
20. Reagan SE, Fruits TJ, Van Brunt CL, Ward CK. Effects of cyclic loading on selected post-and-core systems. Quintessence Int 1999;30:61-7.
21. Sirimai S, Riis DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:262-9.
22. Isidor F, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth with tapered, individually cast or prefabricated, parallel-sided posts. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:257-61.
23. Rosentritt M, Furer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000;27:595-601.
24. Kelly JR. Clinically relevant approach to failure testing of all-ceramic restorations. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:652-61.
25. Sakaguchi RL, Douglas WH, DeLong R, Pintado MR. The wear of a posterior composite in an artificial mouth: a clinical correlation. Dent Mater 1986;2:235-40.
26. Krejci I, Reich T, Lutz F, Albertoni M. [An in vitro test procedure for evaluating dental restoration systems. 1. A computer-controlled mastication simulator.] Schweiz Monatsschr Zahnmed 1990;100:953-60. German.
27. DeLong R, Douglas WH. Development of an artificial oral environment for the testing of dental restoratives: bi-axial force and movement control. J Dent Res 1983;62:32-6.
28. Jordan RE, Abrams L, Kraus BS. Kraus' dental anatomy and occlusion. St. Louis: Mosby; 1992. p. 7-27, 239-62.
29. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:419-24.
30. Dong JK, Luthy H, Wohlwend A, Scharer P. Heat-pressed ceramics: technology and strength. Int J Prosthodont 1992;5:9-16.
31. Loney RW, Moulding MB, Ritsco RG. The effect of load angulation on fracture resistance of teeth restored with cast post and cores and crowns. Int J Prosthodont 1995;8:247-51.
32. Bates JF, Stafford GD, Harrison A. Masticatory function - a review of the literature. 2. Speed of movement of the mandible, rate of chewing and forces developed in chewing. J Oral Rehabil 1975;2:349-61.
33. De Boever JA, McCall WD Jr, Holden S, Ash MM Jr. Functional occlusal forces: an investigation by telemetry. J Prosthet Dent 1978;40:326-33.
34. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
35. Ryther JS, Leary JM, Aquilino SA, Diaz-Arnold AM. Evaluation of the fracture resistance of a wrought post compared with completely cast post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:443-8.
36. Strub JR, Pontius O, Koutayas S. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems after exposure in the artificial mouth. J Oral Rehabil 2001;28:120-4.
37. Martinez-Insua A, da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:527-32.
38. Patel A, Gutteridge DL. An in vitro investigation of cast post and partial core design. J Dent 1996;24:281-7.