Microhardness of composites in simulated root canals cured with light transmitting posts and glass-fiber reinforced composite posts

Journal of Endodontics

Volumn 31, Issue 2, 2005, Pages 104-106

  Yoldas, Oguz ^a   Alaçam, Tayfun ^a  

^a CUKUROVA UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS FIBER; RESIN;

ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; DENTAL EQUIPMENT; HARDNESS; LIGHT EXPOSURE; SIMULATION; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

EID: 13544266191     PISSN: 00992399     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.DON.0000133160.08600.47     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Milot P, Stein RS. Root fracture in endodontically treated teeth related to post selection and crown design. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:428-31.
2. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics, 3rd ed. Chicago: Quintessence Publishing, 1996:194-209.
3. Schwartz R, Robbins J. Post placement and restoration of endodontically treated teeth: a literature review. J Endod 2004;30:289-301.
4. Caputo AA, Standlee JP. Biomechanics in clinical dentistry. Berlin: Quintessence Publishing, 1987:21-7.
5. Craig RG, Farah JW. Stress analysis and design of single restorations and fixed bridges. Oral Sci Rev 1977;10:45-74.
6. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-11.
7. Saupe WA, Gluskin HA, Radke RA. A comparative study of fracture resistance between conventional dowel and cores and a resin reinforced dowel system in the intraradicular restoration of structurally compromised roots. Quintessence Int 1996;27:483-91.
8. Pontius O, Hutter JW. Survival rate and fracture strength of incisors restored with different post and core systems and endodontically treated incisors without coronoradicular reinforcement. J Endod 2002;28:710-5.
9. Lui JL. A technique to reinforce weakened roots with post canals. Endo Dent Traumatol 1987;3:310-4.
10. Lui JL. Depth of composite polymerization within simulated root canals using light-transmitting posts. Oper Dent 1994;19:165-8.
11. Pest LB, Cavalli G, Bertoni P, Gagliani M. Adhesive post-endodontic restorations with fiber posts: push-out tests and SEM observations. Dent Mater 2002;18:596-602.
12. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002;28:629-33.
13. Hurmuzlu F, Kiremitci A, Serper A, Altunda§ar E, Siso SH. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated premolars restored with ormocer and packable composite. J Endodon 2003;29:838-40.
14. Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers J. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod 2003;29:125-31.
15. Alaçam T, Uzun Ö, Kivanç BH, Yoldas O, Görgül G, Tinaz C. Microhardness of packable composites used as posts condensed with different methods. J Endod 2004;30:51-53.
16. Watts DC, Am OM, Combe EC. Surface hardness development in light-cured composites. Dent Mater 1987;3:265-269.
17. Yap AU. Effectiveness of polymerization in composite restoratives claiming bulk placement: impact of cavity depth and exposure time. Oper Dent 2000;25:113-120.
18. Yap AU, Wee KE, Teoh SH. Effect of cyclic temperature changes on hardness of composite resins. Oper Dent 2002;27:25-29.
19. Martelli R. Fourth-generation intraradicular posts for the aesthetic restoration of anterior teeth. Pract Periodont Aest Dent 2000;12:579-84.