Repetition and financial incentives in economic experiments

Journal of Economic Surveys

Volumn 21, Issue 3, 2007, Pages 628-681

  Lee, Jinkwon ^a  

^a Korea Environment Institute (KEI)   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Experimental economics; Financial incentives; Methodology; Payoff mechanisms; Repetition

Indexed keywords

EXPERIMENTAL STUDY; FINANCE; INCENTIVE; METHODOLOGY;

EID: 34250833295     PISSN: 09500804     EISSN: 14676419     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-6419.2007.00516.x     Document Type: Review

References (150)

1. Arrow, K.J. (1970) Essays in the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
2. Ashton, R.H. (1990) Pressure and performance in accounting decision settings: Paradoxical effects of incentives, feedback, and justification. Journal of Accounting Research 28: 148-180.
3. Bahrick, H.P. (1954) Incidental learning under two incentive conditions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 47 (3): 170-172.
4. Barron, G. and Erev, I. (2003) Small feedback-based decisions and their limited correspondence to description-based decisions. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 16: 215-233.
5. Baumeister, R.F. (1984) Choking under pressure: Self-consciousness and paradoxical effects of incentives on skillful performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 46: 610-620.
6. Beattie, J. and Loomes, G. (1997) The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 14: 155-168.
7. Berg, J.E., Daley, L.A., Dickhaut, J.W. and O'Brien, J.R. (1986) Controlling preferences for lotteries on units of experimental exchange. Quarterly Journal of Economics 101: 281-306.
8. Binswanger, H.P. (1980) Attitudes toward risk: Experimental measurement in rural India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics 62: 395-407.
9. Binswanger, H.P. (1981) Attitudes toward risk: Theoretical implications of an experiment in rural India. Economic Journal 91: 867-890.
10. Bonner, S.E., Hastie, R., Sprinkle, G.B. and Young, S.M. (2000) A review of the effects of financial incentives on performance in laboratory tasks: Implications for management accounting. Journal of Management Accounting Research 12: 19-64.
11. Bull, C., Schotter, A. and Weigelt, K. (1987) Tournaments and piece rates: An experimental study. Journal of Political Economy 95: 1-33.
12. Burke, M.S., Carter, J.R., Gominiak, R.D. and Ohl, D.F. (1996) An experimental note on the Allais paradox and monetary incentives. Empirical Economics 21: 617-632.
13. Burns, P. (1985) Experience and decision-making: A comparison of students and businessmen in a simulated progressive auction. In V.L. Smith (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 3 (pp. 139-157). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
14. Camerer, C.F. (1995) Individual decision making. In J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds), The Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 587-703). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
15. Camerer, C.F. (2003) Behavioral Game Theory: Experiments in Strategic Interaction. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
16. Camerer, C.F. and Ho, T. (1999) Experience-weighted attraction learning in normal form games. Econometrica 67: 827-847.
17. Camerer, C.F. and Hogarth, R.M. (1999) The effect of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor production framework. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 19: 7-42.
18. Camerer, C.F., Ho, T. and Chong, K. (2002a) Sophisticated experience-weighted attraction learning and strategic teaching in repeated games. Journal of Economic Theory 104: 137-188.
19. Camerer, C.F., Ho, T. and Chong, K. (2002b) Strategic teaching and equilibrium models of repeated trust and entry game experiments. Unpublished manuscript, http://www.hss.caltech.edu/~camerer/ camerer.html, accessed July 2003.
20. Cameron, L.A. (1999) Raising the stakes in the ultimatum game: experimental evidence from Indonesia. Economic Inquiry 37 (1): 47-59.
21. Cameron, J. and Pierce, W.D. (1994) Reinforcement, reward, and intrinsic motivation: A meta-analysis. Review of Educational Research 64 (3): 363-423.
22. Carter, J.R. and Irons, M.D. (1991) Are economists different, if so, why? Journal of Economic Perspectives 5: 171-177.
23. Castellan, N.J., Jr (1969) Effect of change of payoff in probability learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (1): 178-182.
24. Cheung, Y. and Friedman, D. (1997) Individual learning in normal form games: Some laboratory results. Games and Economic Behavior 19: 46-76.
25. Cooper, R.W., DeJong, D.V., Forsythe, R. and Ross, T.W. (1989) Communication in battle-of-sexes games: Some experimental results. Rand Journal of Economics 20: 568-587.
26. Cox, J.C. and Grether, D.M. (1996) The preference reversal phenomenon: response mode, markets and incentives. Economic Theory 7: 381-405.
27. Cox, J.C. and Sadiraj, V. (2001) Risk aversion and expected-utility theory: Coherence for small- and large-stakes gambles. Working Paper 01-03, Department of Economics, University of Arizona.
28. Cox, J.C., Smith, V.L. and Walker, J.M. (1992) Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions: Comment. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1392-1412.
29. Craik, F.I.M. and Tulving, E. (1975) Depth of processing and the retention of words in episodic memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General 104 (3): 268-294.
30. Croson, R.T.A. (1996) Partners and strangers revisited. Economics Letters 53: 25-32.
31. Croson, R. and Buchan, N. (1999) Gender and culture: International experimental evidence from trust games. American Economic Review 89 (2): 386-391.
32. Cubitt, R.P., Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1998) On the validity of the random lottery incentive system. Experimental Economics 1: 115-131.
33. Deci, E.L. (1975) Intrinsic Motivation. New York: Plenum.
34. Deci, E.L. and Ryan, R.M. (1987) The support of autonomy and the control of behaviour. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 53: 1024-1037.
35. DeJong, D.V., Forsythe, R. and Uecker, W.C. (1988) A note on the use of businessmen as subjects in sealed offer markets. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organizations 9: 87-100.
36. Drago, R. and Heywood, J.S. (1989) Tournaments, piece rates, and the shape of the payoff function. Journal of Political Economy 97 (4): 992-1001.
37. Eckel, C. and Grossman, P. (forthcoming) Differences in the economic decisions of men and women: Experimental evidence. In V.L. Smith and C.R. Plott (eds), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1. New York: Elsevier.
38. Eisenberger, R. and Cameron, J. (1996) Detrimental effects of reward: reality or myth? American Psychologist 51: 1151-1166.
39. El-Gamal, M.A. and Grether, D.M. (1995) Are people Bayesian?Uncovering behavioral strategies. Journal of the American Statistical Association 90: 1137-1145.
40. Farber, I.E. and Spence, K.W. (1953) Complex learning and conditioning as a function of anxiety. Journal of Experimental Psychology 45: 120-125.
41. Fehr, E., Kirchsteiger, G. and Riedl, A. (1998) Gift exchange and reciprocity in competitive experimental markets. European Economic Review 42: 1-34.
42. Friedman, D. (1992) Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions: comment. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1374-1378.
43. Friedman, D. and Cassar, A. (2004) Economics Lab: An Intensive Course in Experimental Economics. London: Routledge.
44. Friedman, D. and Sunder, S. (1994) Experimental Methods: A Primer for Economists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
45. Fudenberg, D. and Levine, D.K. (1998) The Theory of Learning in Games. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Fudenberg, D. and Tirole, J. (1991) Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
47. Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. (1999) Stochastic game theory: For playing games, not just for doing theory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA 96: 10564-10567.
48. Gneezy, U. and Rustichini, A. (2000) Pay enough or don't pay at all. Quarterly Journal of Economics 115: 791-810.
49. Goeree, J.K. and Holt, C.A. (forthcoming) Learning in economics experiments. In Encyclopedia of Cognitive Psychology. London: Macmillan Reference.
50. Grether, D.M. (1992) Testing Bayes rule and the representativeness heuristic: Some experimental evidence. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 17: 31-57.
51. Grether, D.M. and Plott, C.R. (1979) Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon. American Economic Review 69: 623-638.
52. Harrison, G.W. (1989) Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions. American Economic Review 79: 749-762.
53. Harrison, G.W. (1992) Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions: reply. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1426-1443.
54. Harrison, G.W. (1994) Expected utility theory and the experimentalists. Empirical Economics 19: 223-253.
55. Harrison, G.W. and List, J.A. (2004) Field experiments. Journal of Economics Literature 42 (4): 1013-1059.
56. Harrison, G.W. and Rustrom, E.E. (forthcoming) Experimental evidence on the existence of the hypothetical bias in value elicitation methods. In V.L. Smith and C.R. Plott (eds), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1. New York: Elsevier.
57. Harrison, G.W., Johnson, E., McInnes, M.M. and Rustrom, E.E. (2003) Individual choice and risk aversion in the laboratory: A reconsideration. Working Paper 3-18, Department of Economics, College of Business Administration, University of Central Florida.
58. Henrich, J., Boyd, R., Bowles, S., Camerer, C., Fehr, E., Gintis, H. and McElreath, R. (2001) In search of homo economicus: Behavioral experiments in 15 small-scale societies. American Economic Review 91 (2): 73-78.
59. Hertwig, R. and Ortmann, A. (2001) Experimental practices in economics: a methodological challenge for psychologists? Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 383-451.
60. Hertwig, R. and Ortmann, A. (2003) Economists' and psychologists' experimental practices: How they differ, why they differ, and how they could converge. In I. Brocas and J.D. Carrillo (eds), The Psychology of Economic Decisions (pp. 253-272). New York: Oxford University Press.
61. Hey J.D. and Lee, J. (2005a) Do subjects remember the past? Applied Economics 37 (1): 9-18.
62. Hey, J.D. and Lee, J. (2005b) Do subjects separate (or are they sophisticated)? Experimental Economics 8 (3): 233-265.
63. Ho, T., Camerer, C.F. and Weigelt, K. (1998) Iterated dominance and iterated best response in experimental 'p -beauty contests'. American Economic Review 88: 947-969.
64. Hoffman, E., McCabe, K.A. and Smith, V.L. (1996) On expectation and the monetary stakes in ultimatum games. International Journal of Game Theory 25: 289-301.
65. Hogarth, R.M. and Einhorn, H.J. (1990) Venture theory: A model of decision weights. Management Science 36 (7): 780-803.
66. Hogarth, R.M., Gibbs, B.J., McKenzie, C.R.M. and Marquis, M.A. (1986) Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review 76: 508-515.
67. Hogarth, R.M., Gibbs, B.J., McKenzie, C.R.M. and Marquis, M.A. (1991) Learning from feedback: Exactingness and incentives. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 17 (4): 734-752.
68. Holt, C.A. (2000) The Y2K bibliography of experimental economics. http://www.people.virginia.edu/~cah2k/y2k.htm, accessed October 2002.
69. Holt, C.A. and Davis, D.D. (1993) Experimental Economics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
70. Holt, C.A. and Laury, S.K. (2002) Risk aversion and incentive effects. American Economic Review 92 (5): 1644-1655.
71. Hulland, J.S. and Kleinmuntz, D.N. (1994) Factors influencing the use of internal summary evaluations versus external information in choice. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 7: 79-102.
72. Irwin, J.R., McClelland, G.H. and Schulze, W.D. (1992) Hypothetical and real consequences in experimental auctions for insurance against low-probability risks. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 5: 107-116.
73. Irwin, J.R., McClelland, G.H., McKee, M., Schulze, W.D. and Norden, N.E. (1998) Payoff dominance vs. cognitive transparency in decision making. Economic Inquiry 36: 272-285.
74. Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M. and Williams, A.W. (1994) Group size and the voluntary provision of public goods. Journal of Public Economics 54: 1-36.
75. Isaac, R.M., Walker, J.M. and Williams, A.W. (2001) Experimental economics methods in the large undergraduate classroom: Practical considerations. In R.M. Isaac (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 8 (pp. 1-23). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
76. Jamal, K. and Sunder, S. (1991) Money vs. gaming: Effects of salient monetary payments in double oral auctions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 49: 151-166.
77. Jenkins, G.D. (1986) Financial incentives. In E.A. Locke (ed.), Generalizing from Laboratory to Field Settings (pp. 167-180). Lexington, MA: Lexington Books.
78. Jenkins, G.D., Mitra, A., Gupta, N. and Shaw, J.D. (1998) Are financial incentives related to performance?: A meta-analytic review of empirical research. Journal of Applied Psychology 83: 777-787.
79. Kachelmeier, S.J. and Shehata, M. (1992) Examining risk preferences under high monetary incentives: Experimental evidence from the People's Republic of China. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1120-1141.
80. Kagel, J.H. and Roth, A.E. (1992) Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions: Comment. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1379-1391.
81. Kagel, J.H., Battalio, R.C. and Walker, J.M. (1979) Volunteer artifacts in experiments in economics: Specification of the problem and some initial data from a small-scaled field experiment. In V.L. Smith (ed.), Research in Experimental Economics, Vol. 1 (pp. 169-197). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
82. Kahneman, D. and Peavler, W.C. (1969) Incentive effects and pupillary changes in association learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology 79 (2): 312-318.
83. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979) Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica 47: 263-291.
84. Kahneman, D., Peavler, W.C. and Onuska, L. (1968) Effects of verbalization and incentive on the pupil response to mental activity. Canadian Journal of Psychology 22 (3): 186-196.
85. Kandori, M. (1992) Social norms and community enforcement. Review of Economic Studies 59 (1): 63-80.
86. Karni, E. and Safra, Z. (1987) 'Preference reversal' and the observability of preferences by experimental methods. Econometrica 55: 675-685.
87. Keynes, J.M. (1936) The General Theory of Interest, Employment and Money. London: Macmillan.
88. Laury, S.K. (2005) Pay one or pay all: Random selection of one choice for payment. Andrew Young School of Policy Studies Research Paper Series No. 06-13, Department of Economics, Georgia State University.
89. Ledyard, J.O. (1995) Public goods: A survey of experimental research. In J.H. Kagel and A.E. Roth (eds), The Handbook of Experimental Economics (pp. 111-194). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
90. Lee, J. (2006) Accumulated or random: An experimental investigation on the payoff mechanisms under repetition. Mimeo, Korea Environment Institute.
91. Lepper, M.R., Greene, D. and Nisbett, R.E. (1973) Undermining children's intrinsic interest with extrinsic reward: A test of the 'overjustification' hypothesis. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 28: 129-137.
92. Levin, I.P., Chapman, D.P. and Johnson, R.D. (1988) Confidence in judgments based on incomplete information: An investigation using both hypothetical and real gambles. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 1: 29-41.
93. Levitt, S.D. and List, J.A. (forthcoming) What do laboratory experiments measuring social preferences tell us about the real world. Journal of Economic Perspectives.
94. Lichtenstein, S. and Slovic, P. (1971) Reversal of preference between bids and choices in gambling decisions. Journal of Experimental Psychology 89: 46-55.
95. List, J.A. and Cherry, T.L. (2000) Learning to accept in ultimatum games: Evidence from an experimental design that generates low offers. Experimental Economics 3: 11-29.
96. Loomes, G. and Sugden, R. (1998) Testing different stochastic specifications of risk choice. Economica 65: 581-598.
97. McClintock, C.G. and McNeel, S.P. (1966) Reward level and game playing behaviour. Journal of Conflict Resolution 10: 98-102.
98. Merlo, A. and Schotter, A. (1992) Theory and misbehavior of first price auctions: Comment. American Economic Review 82 (5): 1413-1425.
99. Merlo, A. and Schotter, A. (1994) An experimental study of learning in one and two-person games. Working Paper RR#94-17, C.V. STARR Center in Applied Economics, New York University.
100. Merlo, A. and Schotter, A. (1999) A surprise-quiz view of learning in economic experiments. Games and Economic Behavior 28: 25-54.
101. Merlo, A. and Schotter, A. (2003) Learning by not doing: An experimental investigation of observational learning. Games and Economic Behavior 42: 116-136.
102. Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J. (1991) Adaptive and sophisticated learning in normal form games. Games and Economic Behavior 3: 82-100.
103. Millner, E.L. and Pratt, M.D. (1991) Risk aversion and rent-seeking: An extension and some experimental evidence. Public Choice 69: 81-92.
104. Mookherjee, D. and Sopher, B. (1997) Learning and decision costs in experimental constant sum games. Games and Economic Behavior 19: 97-132.
105. Moulin, H. (1986) Game Theory for Social Science. New York: New York Press.
106. Murnighan, J.K., Roth, A.E. and Schoumaker, F. (1988) Risk aversion in bargaining: An experimental study. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty 1: 101-124.
107. Nagel, R. (1999) A survey on experimental beauty contest games: Bounded rationality and learning. In D.V. Budescu, I. Erev and R. Zwick (eds), Games and Human Behavior: Essays in Honor of Amnon Rapoport (pp. 105-142). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
108. Neelin, J., Sonnenschein, H. and Spiegel, M. (1988) A further test of noncooperative bargaining theory: Comment. American Economic Review 78 (4): 824-836.
109. Ordonez, L.D., Mellers, B.A., Chang, S. and Roberts, J. (1995) Are preference reversals reduced when made explicit? Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8: 265-277.
110. Palacios-Huerta, I., Serrano, R. and Volij, O. (2001) Rejecting small gambles under expected utility: A comment on Rabin. Working Paper No. 2001-05, Brown University.
111. Pelham, B.W. and Neter, E. (1995) The effect of motivation of judgment depends on the difficulty of the judgment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 68: 581-594.
112. Phillips, L.D. and Edwards, W. (1966) Conservatism in a simple probability inference task. Journal of Experimental Psychology 72 (3): 346-354.
113. Pommerehne, W.W., Schneider, F. and Zweifel, P. (1982) Economic theory of choice and the preference reversal phenomenon: A reexamination. American Economic Review 72: 569-574.
114. Pratt, J.W. (1964) Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica 32: 122-136.
115. Prendergast, C. (1999) The provision of incentives in firms. Journal of Economic Literature 37: 7-63.
116. Rabin, M. (2000) Risk aversion and expected utility theory: A calibration theorem. Econometrica 68: 1281-1292.
117. Roth, A.E. and Erev, I. (1995) Learning in extensive form games: experimental data and simple dynamic models in the intermediate term. Games and Economic Behavior 8 (1): 164-212.
118. Roth, A.E. and Murnighan, J.K. (1978) Equilibrium behavior and repeated play of the prisoner's dilemma. Journal of Mathematical Psychology 17: 189-198.
119. Roth, A.E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiwara, M. and Zamir, S. (1991) Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: An experimental study. American Economic Review 81: 1068-1095.
120. Rothschild, M. and Stiglitz, J.S. (1970) Increasing risk I: A definition. Journal of Economic Theory 2: 225-243.
121. Rubinstein, A. (2001) Comments on the risk and time preferences in economics. Unpublished manuscript.
122. Salthouse, T.A., Rogan, J.D. and Prill, K.A. (1984) Division of attention: Age differences on a visually presented memory task. Memory and Cognition 12 (6): 613-620.
123. SBS (2003) SBS 8 News, 15 January 2003. http://news.sbs.co.kr/indexes/ vod/8news_index.html, accessed August 2003.
124. Schubert, R., Brown, M., Gysler, M. and Brachinger, H.W. (1999) Financial decision-making: Are women really more risk-averse? American Economic Review 89 (2): 381-385.
125. Segal, U. (1990) Two-stage lotteries without the reduction axiom. Econometrica 58: 349-377.
126. Selten, R., Sadrieh, A. and Abbink, K. (1999) Money does not induce risk neutral behavior, but binary lotteries do even worse. Theory and Decision 46: 211-249.
127. Siegel, S. (1959) Theoretical models of choice and strategy behavior: stable state behavior in the two-choice uncertain outcome situation. Psychometrika 24 (4): 303-316.
128. Simon, H.A. (1987) Rationality in psychology and economics. In R.M. Hogarth and M.W. Reder (eds), Rational Choice: The Contrast between Economics and Psychology. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
129. Sippel, R. (1997) An experiment on the pure theory of consumer behaviour. Economic Journal 107: 1431-1444.
130. Slonim, R. and Roth, A.E. (1998) Learning in high stakes ultimatum games: An experiment in the Slovak Republic. Econometrica 66 (3): 569-596.
131. Slovic, P., Lichtenstein, S. and Edwards, W. (1965) Boredom-induced changes in preferences among bets. American Journal of Psychology 78: 208-217.
132. Smith, V.L. (1962) An experimental study of competitive market behavior. Journal of Political Economy 70: 111-137.
133. Smith, V.L. (1965) Experimental auction markets and the Walrasian hypothesis. Journal of Political Economy 73: 387-393.
134. Smith, V.L. (1976) Experimental economics: Induced value theory. American Economic Review 66: 274-279.
135. Smith, V.L. (1982) Microeconomic systems as an experimental science. American Economic Review 72: 923-955.
136. Smith, V.L. (1991) Papers in Experimental Economics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
137. Smith, V.L. (1994) Economics in the laboratory. Journal of Economic Perspectives 8 (1): 113-131.
138. Smith, V.L. (2002) Methods in experiment: Rhetoric and reality. Experimental Economics 5: 91-110.
139. Smith, V.L. and Walker, J.M. (1993a) Monetary rewards and decision cost in experimental economics. Economic Inquiry 31: 245-261.
140. Smith, V.L. and Walker, J.M. (1993b) Rewards, experience and decision costs in first price auctions. Economics Inquiry 31: 237-244.
141. Starmer, C. and Sugden, R. (1991) Does the random lottery incentive system elicit true preferences?An experimental investigation. American Economics Review 81: 971-978.
142. Straub, P.G. and Murnighan, J.K. (1995) An experimental investigation of ultimatum games: Information, fairness, expectations, and lowest acceptable offers. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 27: 345-364.
143. Telser, L.G. (1995) The ultimatum game and the law of demand. Economic Journal 105: 1519-1523.
144. van Wallendael, L.R. (1995) Implicit diagnosticity in an information-buying task. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 8: 245-264.
145. Weber, R.A. (2003) 'Learning' with no feedback in a competitive guessing game. Games and Economic Behavior 44: 134-144.
146. Weibull, J.W. (1995) Evolutionary Game Theory. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
147. Wilcox, N.T. (1993) Lottery choice: Incentives, complexity and decision time. Economic Journal 103: 1397-1417.
148. van Winden, F., van Dijk, F. and Sonnemans, J. (forthcoming) Intrinsic motivation in a public good environment. In V.L. Smith and C. Plott (eds), Handbook of Experimental Economics Results, Vol. 1. New York: Elsevier.
149. Yaniv, I. and Schul, Y. (1997) Elimination and inclusion procedures in judgment. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making 10: 211-220.
150. Zizzo, D.J., Stolarz-Fantino, S., Wen, J. and Fantino, E. (2000) A violation of the monotonicity axiom: Experimental evidence on the conjunction fallacy. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 41: 263-276.