Testing different stochastic specifications of risky choice

Economica

Volumn 65, Issue 260, 1998, Pages 581-598

  Loomes, Graham ^a   Sugden, Robert ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MODELING;

EID: 0032455677     PISSN: 00130427     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/1468-0335.00147     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. ALLAIS, M. (1953). Le comportement de l'homme rationnel devant le risque: critique des postulats et axiomes de l'école américaine. Econometrica, 21, 503-46.
2. BEATTIE, J. and LOOMES, G. (1997). The impact of incentives upon risky choice experiments. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 14, 149-62.
3. BECKER, G. M., DEGROOT, M. H. and MARSCHAK, J. (1963). Stochastic models of choice behavior. Behavioral Science, 8, 41-55.
4. CAMERER, C. F. (1989). An experimental test of several generalized utility theories. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 61-104.
5. HARLESS, D. and CAMERER, C. F. (1994). The predictive utility of generalized expected utility theories. Econometrica, 62, 1251-89.
6. HEY, J. D. and ORME, C. (1994). Investigating generalizations of expected utility theory using experimental data. Econometrica, 62, 1291-326.
7. HOLT, C. A. (1986). Preference reversals and the independence axiom. American Economic Review, 76, 508-15.
8. KAHNEMAN, D. and TVERSKY, A. (1979). Prospect theory: an analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47, 263-91.
9. LOOMES, G. (1998). Probabilities vs. money: a test of some fundamental assumptions about rational decision making. Economic Journal, 108, 477-89.
10. _ and SUGDEN, R. (1987). Some implications of a more general form of regret theory. Journal of Economic Theory, 41, 270-87.
11. _ and _ (1995). Incorporating a stochastic element into decision theories. European Economic Review, 39, 641-8.
12. QUIGGIN, J. (1982). A theory of anticipated utility. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 3, 323-43.
13. RUBINSTEIN, A. (1988). Similarity and decision-making under risk. (Is there a utility theory resolution to the Allais Paradox?) Journal of Economic Theory, 46, 145-53.
14. SOPHER, B. and GIGLIOTTI, G. (1993). Intransitive cycles: rational choice or random error? An answer based on estimation of error rates with experimental data. Theory and Decision, 35, 311-36.
15. STARMER, C. and SUGDEN, R. (1989a). Violations of the independence axiom in common ratio problems: an experimental test of some competing hypotheses. Annals of Operations Research, 19, 79-102.
16. _ and _ (1989b). Probability and juxtaposition effects: an experimental investigation of the common ratio effect. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 2, 159-78.
17. _ and _ (1991). Does the random-lottery incentive system elicit true preferences? An experimental investigation. American Economic Review, 81, 971-8.
18. TVERSKY, A. (1969). Intransitivity of preferences. Psychological Review, 76, 31-48.
19. _ and KAHNEMAN, D. (1992). Advances in prospect theory: cumulative representation of uncertainty. Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 5, 297-323.