Organizational justice: Looking back, looking forward

International Journal of Conflict Management

Volumn 16, Issue 1, 2005, Pages 4-29

  Nowakowski, Jaclyn M ^a   Conlon, Donald E ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Fairness; Organizational justice; Outcome

Indexed keywords

EID: 34250736802     PISSN: 10444068     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1108/eb022921     Document Type: Review

References (61)

1. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 2, pp. 267-299). New York: Academic.
2. Ambrose, M. L., & Schminke, M. (2003). Organization structure as a moderator of the relationship between procedural justice, interactional justice, perceived organizational support, and supervisory trust. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 295-305.
3. Babcock, L., Loewenstein, G., Issacharoff, S., & Camerer, C. (1995). Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining. American Economic Review, 85, 1337-1342.
4. Begley, T. M., Lee, C, Fang, Y., & Li, J. (2002). Power distance as a moderator of the relationship between justice and employee outcomes in a sample of Chinese employees. Journal of Managerial Psychology. 17, 692-711.
5. Bies, R. J., & Moag, J. F. (1986). Interactional justice: Communication criteria of fairness. In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 43-55). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
6. Blader, S. L., Chang, C. C., & Tyler, T. R. (2001). Procedural justice and retaliation in organizations: Comparing cross-nationally the importance of fair group processes. Internationaljournal of Conflict Management, 12, 295-311.
7. Bond, M. H., Wan, K. C., Leung, K., & Giacolone, R. (1985). How are responses to verbal insults related to cultural collectivism and power-distance? Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 16, 111-127.
8. Brockner, J., & Adsit, L. (1986). The moderating impact of sex on the equity-satisfaction relationship: A field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 585-590.
9. Byrne, Z. S., & Cropanzano, R. (2001). History of organizational justice: The founders speak. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 3-26). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
10. Chiu, C. Y., Hong, Y. Y., & Dweck, C. S. (1997). Lay dispositionism and implicit theories of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 73, 19-30.
11. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2001). The role of justice in organizations: A metaanalysis. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 86, 278-321.
12. Cohen-Charash, Y., & Spector, P. E. (2002). The role of justice in organizations: A metaanalysis: Erratum. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 89, 1215. Colquitt, J. A. (2001). On the dimensionality of organizational justice: A construct validation of a measure. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 386-400.
13. Colquitt, J. A., Conlon, D. E., Wesson, M. J., Porter, C. O. L. H., & Ng, K. Y. (2001). Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 425-445.
14. Colquitt, J. A., & Greenberg, J. (2003). Organizational justice: A fair assessment of the state of the literature. In J. Greenberg (Ed.), Organizational behavior: The state of the science (2nd ed., pp. 165-210). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
15. Conlon, D. E., Porter, C. O. L. H., & McLean Parks, J. (2004). The fairness of decision rules. Journal of Management, 30, 329-349.
16. Deutsch, M. (1975). Equity, equality, and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis of distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues, 31, 137-149.
17. Deutsch, M. (1985). Distributive justice: A social-psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
18. Eisenberger, R., Lynch, P., Aselage, J., & Rohdieck, S. (2004). Who takes the most revenge? Individual differences in negative reciprocity norm endorsement. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30, 789-799.
19. Folger, R. (1987). Reformulating the preconditions of resentment: A referent cognitions model. In J. C. Masters & W. P. Smith (Eds.), Social comparison, social justice, and relative deprivation: Theoretical, empirical, and policy perspectives (pp. 183-215). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Gilliland, S. W., & Steiner, D. D. (2001). Causes and consequences of applicant perceptions of unfairness. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: From theory to practice (Vol. 2, pp. 175-195). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
21. Gordon, M. E., & Fryxell, G. E. (1989). Voluntariness of association as a moderator of the importance of procedural and distributive justice. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 19 (12, Pt l), 993-1009.
22. Gouldner, A. W. (1960). The norm of reciprocity: A preliminary statement. American Sociological Review, 25, 161-178.
23. Greenberg, J. (1993a). The social side of fairness: Interpersonal and informational classes of organizational justice. In R. Cropanzano (Ed.), Justice in the workplace: Approaching fairness in human resource management (pp. 79-103). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Greenberg, J. (1993b). Stealing in the name of justice: Informational and interpersonal moderators of theft reactions to underpayment inequity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 54, 81-103.
25. Greenberg, J., & McCarty, C. (1990). The interpersonal aspects of procedural justice: A new perspective on pay fairness. Labor Law Journal, 41, 580-586.
26. Hagedoom, M., Buunk, B. P., & Van de Vliert, E. (1998). Opening the black box between justice and reactions to unfavorable outcomes in the workplace. Social Justice Research, 77, 41-57.
27. Horvath, M. (2002). Who's to blame? An exploration of the role of blame perceptions as moderators of relationships between organizational justice perceptions and consequences. Doctoral dissertation Unpublished paper, Michigan State University, East Lansing.
28. Huseman, R. C., Hatfield, J. D., & Miles, E. W. (1987). A new perspective on equity theory: The equity sensitivity construct. Academy of Management Review, 12, 222-234.
29. Joy, V. L., & Witt, L. A. (1992). Delay of gratification as a moderator of the procedural justice-distributive justice relationship. Group and Organization Management, 17, 297-308.
30. King, W. C., Miles, E. W., & Day, D. (1993). A test and refinement of the equity sensitivity construct. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14, 301-317.
31. Kravitz, D. A., Stinson, V., & Chavez, T. L. (1996). Evaluations of tests used for making selection and promotion decisions. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 4,24-34.
32. Kwong, J. Y. Y., & Leung, K. (2002). A moderator of the interaction effect of procedural justice and outcome favorability: Importance of the relationship. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 87, 278-299.
33. Lee, C, & Farh, J. L. (1999). The effects of gender in organizational justice perception. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 133-143.
34. Lee, C, Pillutla, M., & Law, K. S. (2000). Power-distance, gender, and organizational justice. Journal of Management, 26, 685-704.
35. Leventhal, G. S. (1976). Fairness in social relationships. In J. W. Thibaut, J. T. Spence, & R. C. Carson (Eds.), Contemporary topics in social psychology (pp. 212-239). Morristown, NJ: General Learning.
36. Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What should be done with equity theory? In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg, & R. H. Willis (Eds.), Social exchange: Advances in theory and research (pp. 27-55). New York: Plenum.
37. Leventhal, G. S., Karuza, J., & Fry, W. R. (1980). Beyond fairness: A theory of allocation preferences. In G. Mikula (Ed.), Justice and social interaction (pp. 167-218). New York: Springer-Verlag.
38. McLean Parks, J., Conlon, D. E., Ang, S., & Bontempo, R. (1999). The manager giveth, the manager taketh away: Variation in distribution/recovery rules due to resource type and cultural orientation. Journal of Management, 25, 723-757.
39. Mikula, G., Scherer, K. R., & Athenstaedt, U. (1998). The role of injustice in the elicitation of differential emotional reactions. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24, 769-783.
40. Murphy, K. R., Thornton, G. C., & Reynolds, D. H. (1990). College students' attitudes toward employee drug testing programs. Personnel Psychology, 43, 615-631.
41. Pruitt, D. G. (1981). Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
42. Rescher. N. (1966). Distributive justice. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.
43. Rhoades, L., & Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: A review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87, 698-714.
44. Schminke, M., Ambrose, M. L., & Cropanzano, R. S. (2000). The effect of organizational structure on perceptions of procedural fairness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 294-304.
45. Schmitt, M. (1996). Individual differences in sensitivity to befallen injustice (SBI). Personality and Individual Differences, 21, 3-20.
46. Shoda, Y., & Mischel, W. (1993). Cognitive social approach to dispositional inferences: What if the perceiver is a cognitive social theorist? Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 19, 574-585.
47. Skarlicki, D. P., & Folger, R. (1997). Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice. Journal of Applied Psychology, 82, 434-443.
48. Skarlicki, D. P., Folger, R., & Tesluk, P. (1999). Personality as a moderator in the relationship between fairness and retaliation. Academy of Management Journal, 4), 100-108.
49. Spielberger, C. D., Sydeman, S. J., Owen, A. E., & Marsh, B. J. (1999). Measuring anxiety and anger with the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) and the State-Trait Anger Expression Inventory (STAXI). In M. E. Maruish (Ed.), The use of psychological testing for treatment planning and outcomes assessment (pp. 993-1021). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
50. Steiner, D. D., & Gilliland, S. W. (1996). Fairness reactions to personnel selection techniques in France and the United States. Journal of Applied Psychology, 81, 134-141.
51. Sweeney, P. D., & McFarlin, D. B. (1997). Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 83-98.
52. Tepper, B. J., Lockhart, D., & Hoobler, J. (2001). Justice, citizenship, and role definition effects. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 789-796.
53. Tepper, B. J., & Taylor, E. C. (2003). Relationships among supervisors' and subordinates' procedural justice perceptions and organizational citizenship behaviors. Academy of Management Journal, 46, 97-105.
54. Thibaut, J. \V., & Walker, L. (1975). Procedural justice: A psychological perspective. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
55. Tomblom, K. Y., Jonsson, D., & Foa, U. G. (1985). Nationality, resource class and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 9, 51-77.
56. Tyler, T. R. (1986). When does procedural justice matter in organizational settings? In R. J. Lewicki, B. H. Sheppard, & M. H. Bazerman (Eds.), Research on negotiations in organizations (Vol. 1, pp. 7-23). Greenwich, CT: JAI.
57. Van den Bos, K. (2001). Uncertainty management: The influence of uncertainty salience on reactions to perceived procedural fairness. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80, 931-941.
58. Van den Bos, K., Wilke, H. A. M., & Lind, E. (1998). When do we need procedural fairness? The role of trust in authority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75,1449-1458.
59. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. (1979). Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
60. Witt, L. A., Kacmar, K., & Andrews, M. C. (2001). The interactive effects of procedural justice and exchange ideology on supervisor-rated commitment. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 505-515.
61. Young, H. P. (1995). The economics of convention. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 05-122.