The fairness of decision rules

Journal of Management

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 329-349

  Conlon, Donald E ^a   Porter, Christopher O L H ^b   MacLean Parks, Judi ^c  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b TEXAS A AND M UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST LOUIS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 1842449645     PISSN: 01492063     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.jm.2003.04.001     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Adams, J. S. 1965. Inequity in social exchange. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in social psychology: Vol. 2, 267-299. New York: Academic Press.
2. Alexander S. Ruderman M. The role of procedural and distributive justice in organizational behavior Social Justice Research 1 1987 177-198
3. Andrews M.C. Kacmar K.M. Discriminating among organizational politics, justice, and support Journal of Organizational Behavior 22 2001 347-366
4. Arkes H.R. Joyner C. Pezzo M. Nash J. Siegel-Jacobs K. Stone E. The psychology of windfall gains Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 59 1994 331-347
5. Austin W. Friendship and fairness: Effects of type of relationship and task performance on choice of distribution rules Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 6 1980 402-408
6. Babcock L. Loewenstein G. Issacharoff S. Camerer C. Biased judgments of fairness in bargaining American Economic Review 85 1995 1337-1343
7. Bierhoff, H., Buck, E., & Klein, R. 1986. Social context and perceived justice. In H. Bierhoff, R. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations: 165-185. New York: Plenum.
8. Bunch, J. F. 1993. The effects of changes in allocation rules and reward budget reductions on recipient reactions to reward distribution. Paper presented at the 1993 meetings of the Academy of Management, Atlanta, GA.
9. Chen C.C. New trends in rewards allocation preferences: A Sino-U.S. comparison Academy of Management Journal 38 1995 408-428
10. Cialdini, R. B. 1984. Influence. New York: Quill.
11. Cohen-Charash Y. Spector P. The role of justice in organizations: A meta-analysis Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 86 2001 278-321
12. Colquitt J. Conlon D. Wesson M. Porter C. Ng K. Justice at the millennium: A meta-analytic review of 25 years of organizational justice research Journal of Applied Psychology 86 2001 425-445
13. Conlon, E., & McLean Parks, J. 1990. The evolution of compensation agreements in principal/agent dyads: An experiment. Academy of Management Journal: 603-622.
14. Cropanzano, R., & Ambrose, M. 2001. Procedural and distributive justice are more similar than you think: A monistic view and a research agenda. In J. Greenberg & R. Cropanzano (Eds.), Advances in organizational justice: 119-151. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
15. Deutsch M. Equity, equality and need: What determines which value will be used as the basis for distributive justice? Journal of Social Issues 31 1975 137-149
16. Deutsch, M. 1985. Distributive justice: A social psychological perspective. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
17. Foa, U. 1993. Interpersonal and economic resources. In U. Foa, J. Converse Jr., K. Tornblom, & E. Foa (Eds.), Resource theory: Explorations and applications: 13-30. New York: Academic Press.
18. Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. 1975. Resource theory of social exchange. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
19. Folger, R. 1986. A referent cognitions theory of relative deprivation. In J. M. Olson, C. P. Herman, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), Relative deprivation and social comparison: The Ontario symposium: Vol. 4, 33-54. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. Folger, R. 1993. Reactions to mistreatment at work. In J. K. Murnighan (Ed.), Social psychology in organizations: Advances in theory and research: 161-183. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
21. Garland H. Conlon D. Too close to quit: The role of project completion in maintaining commitment Journal of Applied Social Psychology 28 1998 2025-2048
22. Graen G.B. Uhl-Bien M. Relationship-based approach to leadership: Development of leader-member exchange (LMX) theory of leadership over 25 years: Applying a multi-level multi-domain perspective Leadership Quarterly 6 1995 219-247
23. Griffith, W. I. 1989. The allocation of negative outcomes. In Advances in group processes: Vol. 6, 107-137. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
24. Kabanoff B. Equity, equality, power and conflict Academy of Management Review 16 1991 416-441
25. Kahneman D. Knetsch J. Thaler R. Experimental test of the endowment effect and the Coase theorem Journal of Political Economy 98 1990 1325-1348
26. Kahneman D. Tversky A. Prospect theory: An analysis of decisions under risk Econometrica 47 1979 263-291
27. Leventhal, G. S. 1976. Fairness in social relationships. Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
28. Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. 1988. The social psychology of procedural justice. New York: Plenum.
29. Lublin, J. S. 2001, December 4. Your career matters. Amid downturn, more companies cut pay, benefits. Wall Street Journal, B1.
30. Mannix E. Neale M. Northcraft G. Equity, equality, or need? The effects of organizational culture on the allocation of benefits and burdens Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 63 1995 276-286
31. McLean Parks J. Boles T. Conlon D. DeSouza E. Gatewood W. Gibson K. Halpern J. Locke D. Straub P. Wilson G. Murnighan J.K. The fair distribution of adventitious outcomes Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 67 1996 181-200
32. McLean Parks J. Conlon D. Ang S. Bontempo R. The manager giveth, the manager taketh away: Variation in distribution/recovery rules due to resource type and cultural orientation Journal of Management 25 1999 723-757
33. Messick, D. 1993. Equality as a decision heuristic. In B. Mellers & J. Baron (Eds.), Psychological perspectives on justice: 11-31. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
34. Messick D. Sentis K. Fairness and preference Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 15 1979 418-434
35. Mintzberg, H. 1973. The nature of managerial work. New York: Harper & Row.
36. Pfeffer J. Langton N. Wage inequality and the organization of work: The case of academic departments Administrative Science Quarterly 33 1988 588-606
37. Pruitt, D. G. 1981. Negotiation behavior. New York: Academic Press.
38. Rahim M.A. Magner N.R. Shapiro D.L. Do justice perceptions influence styles of handling conflict with supervisors? What justice perceptions, precisely? International Journal of Conflict Management 11 2000 9-31
39. Reis H. Gruzen J. On mediating equity, equality, and self-interest: The role of self presentation in social exchange Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 12 1976 487-503
40. Rescher, N. 1966. Distributive justice. New York: Bobbs Merrill Co.
41. Ring N. Squeezing out costs before its too late Schwab, eschewing layoffs, targets executive compensation American Banker 165 245 2000, December 22 1
42. Robinson S. Kraatz M. Rousseau D. Changing obligations and the psychological contract: A longitudinal study Academy of Management Journal 37 1994 137-152
43. Roth A.E. Murnighan J.K. The role of information in bargaining: An experimental study Econometrica 50 1982 1123-1142
44. Sahlins, M. 1972. Stone age economics. Chicago: Aldine Atherton.
45. Schwinger, T. 1986. The need principle of distributive justice. In H. Bierhoff, R. Cohen, & J. Greenberg (Eds.), Justice in social relations: 211-225. New York: Plenum.
46. Sell J. Martin M. The effects of group benefits and type of distribution rule in noncompliance to legitimate authority Social Forces 61 1983 1168-1185
47. Skarlicki D.P. Folger R. Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice Journal of Applied Psychology 82 1997 434-443
48. Sondak H. Neale M. Pinkley R. The negotiated allocation of benefits and burdens: The impact of outcome valence, contribution, and relationship Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 64 1995 249-260
49. Sweeney P.D. McFarlin D.B. Process and outcome: Gender differences in the assessment of justice Journal of Organizational Behavior 18 1997 83-98
50. Thaler R. Toward a positive theory of consumer choice Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 1 1980 39-60
51. Thompson L. Lowenstein G. Egocentric interpretations of fairness and interpersonal conflict Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes 51 1992 176-197
52. Tornblom K. Jonsson D. Subrules of the equality and contribution principles: Their perceived fairness in distribution and retribution Social Psychology Quarterly 48 1985 249-261
53. Tornblom K. Jonsson D. Distribution vs. retribution: The perceived justice of the contribution and equality principles for cooperative and competitive relationships Acta Sociologica 30 1987 25-52
54. Tornblum K. Jonsson D. Foa U. Nationality, resource class, and preferences among three allocation rules: Sweden vs. USA International Journal of Intercultural Relations 9 1985 51-77
55. Tornblum, K. 1988. Positive and negative allocations: A typology and model for conflicting justice principles. Advances in group processes: Vol. 5, 141-168. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
56. Walster, E., Walster, G. W., & Berscheid, E. 1978. Equity: Theory and research. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
57. Welbourne T.M. Balkin D.B. Gomez-Mejia L.R. Gainsharing and mutual monitoring: A combined agency-organizational justice interpretation Academy of Management Journal 38 1995 881-899
58. Young H.P. Dividing the indivisible American Behavioral Scientist 38 1995 904-920