High-throughput microplate enzymatic assays for fast sugar and acid quantification in apple and tomato

Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry

Volumn 55, Issue 9, 2007, Pages 3240-3248

  Vermeir, S ^a   Nicolai B M ^a   Jans, K ^a   Maes, G ^a   Lammertyn, J ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Apple; Enzymatic assays; High throughput analysis; Microplate; Taste; Tomato

Indexed keywords

CARBOHYDRATE; ENZYME;

APPLE; ARTICLE; AUTOANALYSIS; CHEMISTRY; ELECTRONICS; FRUIT; HIGH PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY; PH; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY; TOMATO;

AUTOANALYSIS; CARBOHYDRATES; CHROMATOGRAPHY, HIGH PRESSURE LIQUID; ENZYMES; FRUIT; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MALUS; MINIATURIZATION; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; MALUS X DOMESTICA;

EID: 34249322679     PISSN: 00218561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/jf0637022     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Kühn, B. F.; Thybo, A. The influence of sensory and physiochemical quality on Danish children's preferences for apples. Food Qual. Pref. 2001, 12, 543-550.
2. Harker, F. R.; Gunson, F. A.; Jaeger, S. R. The case for fruit quality: an interpretive review of consumer attitudes, and preference for apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2003, 28, 333-347.
3. Peneau, S.; Hoehn, E.; Roth, H. R.; Escher, F.; Nuessli, J. Importance of consumer perception of freshness of apples. Food Qual. Pref. 2006, 17, 9-19.
4. Lara, I.; Graell, L.; Lopez, M. L.; Echevarria, G. Multivariate analysis of modifications in biosynthesis of volatile compounds after CA storage of 'Fuji' apples. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 39, 19-28.
5. Ruiz, J. J.; Alonso, A.; Garcia-Martinez, S.; Valero, M.; Blasco, P.; Ruiz-Bevia, F. Quantitative analysis of flavour volatiles detects differences among closely related traditional cultivars of tomato. J. Sci. Food Agric. 2005, 85, 54-60.
6. Berna, A. Z.; Lammertyn, J.; Buysens, S.; Di Natale, C.; Nicolaï, B. M. Mapping consumer liking of tomatoes with fast aroma profiling techniques. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2005, 38, 115-127.
7. Saevels, S.; Lammertyn, J.; Berna, A. Z.; Veraverbeke, E. A.; Di Natale, C.; Nicolaï, B. M. An electronic nose and a mass spectrometry-based electronic nose for assessing apple quality during shelf life. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2004, 31, 9-19.
8. Malundo, T. M. M.; Shewfelt, R. L.; Scott, J. W. Flavor quality of fresh tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) as affected by sugar and acid levels. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 1995, 6, 103-110.
9. Salles, C.; Nicklaus, S.; Septier, C. Determination and gustatory properties of taste-active compounds in tomato juice. Food Chem. 2003, 81, 395-402.
10. Silva, B. M.; Andrade, P. B.; Mendes, G. C.; Seabra, R. M.; Ferreira, M. A. Study of the organic acids composition of quince (Cydonia oblonga Miller). J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 2313-2317.
11. Serrano, M.; Guillen, F.; Martinez-Romero, D.; Castillo, S.; Valero, D. Chemical constituents and antioxidant activity of sweet cherry at different ripening stages. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2741-2745.
12. Peirs, A.; Schenk, A.; Nicolaï, B. M. Effect of natural variability among apples on the accuracy of VIS-NIR calibration models for optimal harvest date predictions. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2005, 35, 1-13.
13. Martinez-Romero, D.; Alburquerque, N.; Valverde, J. M.; Guillen, F.; Castillo, S.; Valero, D.; Serrano, M. Postharvest sweet cherry quality and safety maintenance by Aloe Vera treatment: A new edible coating. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2006, 39, 93-100.
14. Harker, F. R.; Marh, K. B.; Young, H.; Murray, S. H.; Gunson, F. A.; Walker, S. B. Sensory interpretation of instrumental measurements 2: Sweet and acid taste of apple fruit. Postharvest Biol. Technol. 2002, 24, 241-250.
15. Eisele, T. A.; Drake, S. R. The partial composition characteristics of apple juice from 175 apple varieties. J. Food Compos. Anal. 2005, 18, 213-221.
16. Deisingh, A. K.; Stone, D. C.; Thompson, M. Applications of electronic noses and tongues in food analysis. Int. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2004, 39, 587-604.
17. Rudnitskaya, A.; Kirsanov, D.; Legin, A.; Beullens, K.; Lammertyn, J.; Nicolaï, B. M.; Irudayaraj, J. Analysis of apple varieties-comparison of electronic tongue with different analytical technique. Sens. Actuators, B 2006, 116, 23-28.
18. Duarte, I. F.; Barros, A.; Almeida, C.; Spraul, M.; Gil, A. M. Multivariate analysis of NMR and FTIR data as a potential tool for the quality control of beer. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1031-1038.
19. Duarte, I. F.; Barros, A.; Almeida, C.; Spraul, M.; Gil, A. M. Application of FTIR spectroscopy for the quantification of sugars in mango juice as a function of ripening. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 3104-3111.
20. Beullens, K.; Kirsanov, D.; Irudayaraj, J.; Rudnitskaya, A.; Legin, A.; Nicolai, B. M.; Lammertyn, J. The electronic tongue and ATR-FTIR for rapid detection of sugars and acids in tomatoes. Sens. Actuators., B 2006, 116, 107-115.
21. Terry, L. A.; White, S. F.; Tigwell, L. J. The application of biosensors to fresh produce and the wider food industry. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 1309-1316.
22. Mello, L. D.; Kubota, L. T. Review of the use of biosensors as analytical tools in the food and drink industries. Food Chem. 2002, 77, 237-256.
23. Prodromidis, M. I.; Karayanni, M. I. Enzyme based amperometric biosensors for food analysis. Electroanalysis 2002, 14, 241-261.
24. Volotovsky, V.; Kim, N. Determination of glucose, ascorbic and citric acids by two-ISFET multienzyme sensor. Sens. Actuators, B 1998, 49, 253-257.
25. Campbell, J. A.; Hansen, R. W.; Wilson, J. R. Cost-effective colorimetric microtitre plate enzymatic assays for sucrose, glucose and fructose in sugarcane tissue extracts. J. Sci. Food Agric. 1999, 79, 232-236.
26. Velterop, J. S.; Vos, F. A rapid and inexpensive microplate assay for the enzymatic determination of glucose, fructose, sucrose, L-malate and citrate in tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) extracts and in orange juice. Phytochem. Anal. 2001, 12, 299-304.
27. Jawaheer, S.; White, S. F.; Rughooputh, S. D. D. V.; Cullen, D. C. Development of a common biosensor for an enzyme based biosensorarray to monitor fruit quality. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2003, 18, 1429-1437.
28. Matsumoto, K.; Tsukatani, T. Simultaneous quantification of citrate and isocitrate in citrus juice by a flow-injection method based on the use of enzyme reactors. Anal. Chim. Acta 1996, 321, 157-164.
29. st century. Curr. Opin. Chem. Biol. 2000, 4, 445-451.
30. Long, G. L.; Winefordner, J. D. Limit of detection. Anal. Chem. 1983, 55, 712-724.
31. Hyltoft Petersen, P.; Stockl, D.; Blaabjerg, O.; Pedersen, B.; Birkemose, E.; Thienpont, L.; Flensted Lansen, J.; Kjeldsen, J. Graphical interpretation of analytical data from comparison of a field method with a reference method by use of difference plots. Clin. Chem. 1997, 43, 2039-2046.
32. Stöckl, D.; Dewitte, K.; Thienpont, L. M. Validity of linear regression in method comparison studies: Is it limited by the statistical model or the quality of the analytical input data. Clin. Chem. 1998, 44, 2340-2346.
33. Bergmeyer, H. U.; Gruber, W.; Gutmann, I. D-Sorbitol. In Methods of Enzymatic Analysis, 2nd ed.; Bergmeyer, H. U., Ed.; Verlag Chemie: Weinheim, Germany, 1974; Vol. 3, pp 1323-1330.
34. Tisza, S.; Sass, P.; Molnarperl, I. Optimization of the simultaneous determination of acids and sugars as their thrimethylsilyl-(oxime) derivatives by gas-chromatography mass-spectrometry and determination of the composition of 6 apple varieties. J. Chromatogr. A 1994, 676, 461-468.
35. Lai Kaushal, B. B.; Sharma, P. C. Apple. In Handbook of Fruit Science and Technology, 2nd ed.; Kadam, S. S., Salunkhe, D. K., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1995; Vol. 5, pp 91-122.
36. Madhavi, D. L.; Salunkhe, D. K. Tomato. In Handbook of Fruit Science and Technology, 2nd ed.; Kadam, S. S., Salunkhe, D. K., Eds.; CRC Press: Boca Raton, FL, 1995; Vol. 7, pp 171-199.