Influence of tissue characteristics at margins on leakage of Class II indirect porcelain restorations

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 1999, Pages 134-142

  Ferrari, Marco ^a,b,c,d   Mason, Pier Nicola ^e   Fabianelli, Andrea ^c   Cagidiaco, Maria C ^b   Kugel, Gerard ^c,d   Davidson, Carel L ^f  

^a Research Center for Dentistry ^*  (Italy)

^b Research Center for Dentistry   (Italy)

^c UNIVERSITY OF SIENA   (Italy)

^d TUFTS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF PADOVA   (Italy)

^f UNIVERSITY OF AMSTERDAM   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

RESIN CEMENT; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE; VARIOLINK;

AGED; ARTICLE; CEMENTUM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; DENTIN; ENAMEL; ENDODONTICS; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR TOOTH; SCANNING ELECTRON MICROSCOPY; TOOTH CERVIX; TOOTH DISEASE; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

AGED; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL CAVITY PREPARATION; DENTAL CEMENTUM; DENTAL ENAMEL; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL PORCELAIN; DENTIN; HUMANS; INLAYS; MARGINAL ADAPTATION (DENTISTRY); MICROSCOPY, ELECTRON, SCANNING; MIDDLE AGED; MOLAR; RESIN CEMENTS; TOOTH CERVIX;

EID: 0033138412     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Thylstrup A, Bille J, Qvist V. Radiographic and observed tissue in approximal carious lesions at the time of operative treatment. Caries Res 1986; 20: 75-84.
2. Anusavice KJ. Quality evaluation of dental restorations. Chicago: Quintessence, 1989.
3. Brännström M. Dentin and pulp in restorative dentistry. London: Wolfe Medical Publ., 1982.
4. Brännström M. Etiology of dentin hypersensitivity. Proc Finn Dent So 1992; 88 (Suppl. 1): 7-13.
5. Nakabayashi N, Nakamura M, Yasuda N. Hybrid layer as dentin bonding mechanism. J Esthet Dent 1991; 3: 133-138.
6. Gwinnett AJ, Kanca J. Micromorphological relationship between resin and dentin in vivo and in vitro. Am J Dent 1992; 5: 19-23.
7. Kanca J. Resin bonding to wet substrate. I. Bonding to dentin. Quint Int 1992; 23: 39-41.
8. Van Meerbeek B, Peumans M, Verschueren M, et al. Clinical status of ten dentin adhesive systems. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1690-1702.
9. Tyas MJ. Clinical performance of two dentine adhesives: 2-year results. Aust Dent J 1996; 41: 324-7.
10. Donly KJ, Jensen ME. Posterior composite Class II restorations: In vitro comparison of preparation designs and restoration techniques. Dent Mater 1990; 6: 88-93.
11. Hilton TJ, Schwartz RS, Ferracane JL. Microleakage of four Class II resin composite insertion techniques at intraoral temperature. Quint Int 1997; 28: 135-144.
12. Robinson PB, Moore BK, Swartz ML. Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro. Oper Dent 1987; 12:113-116.
13. Dietschi D, Scampa G, Campanile U, et al. Marginal adaptation and seal of direct and indirect Class II composite restorations: An in vitro evaluation. Quint Int 1995; 26: 127-138.
14. Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, Davidson CL. Increased wall-to-wall curing contraction in thin bonded resin inlays. J Dent Res 1989; 68: 48-50.
15. Cagidiaco MC. Bonding to dentin: Mechanism, morphology and efficacy of bonding resin composites to dentin in vitro and in vivo. Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam, Ph D Thesis, De Batte Ed., 1995.
16. Ferrari M, Davidson CL. Sealing performance of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose-Z100 in Class II restorations. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 145-149.
17. Picard B, Jardel V, Tirlat G. Ceramic bonding: Reliability. In Degrange M, Roulet JF. Minimally invasive restorations with bonding. Chicago: Quintessence, 1997; 103-127.
18. Kanca J. Wet bonding: Effect of drying time and distance. Am J Dent 1996; 9: 273-276.
19. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, et al. Permeability of dentin to adhesive agents. Quint Int 1993; 24: 618-631.
20. Roulet JF. Longevity of glass ceramic inlays and amalgam-results up to 6 years. Clin Oral Invest 1997; 1:40-46.
21. Cagidiaco MC, Ferrari M, Vichi A, et al. Mapping of tubule and intertubule surface areas available for bonding in class V and class II preparations. J Dent 1997; 25:379-389.
22. Ferrari M, Cagidiaco MC, Davidson CL. Resistance of cementum in Class II and V cavities to penetration by an adhesive system Dental Mater 1997; 13:152-162.
23. Pashley DH, Ciucchi B, Sano H, et al. Bond strength versus dentine structure: A modelling approach. Archs Oral Biol 1995; 40: 1109-1118.
24. Bradford EW. Microanatomy and histochemistry of dentin. In: Miles AEW. Structural and chemical organization of teeth. New York: Academic Press, 1967; VoI II, 49.
25. Blackwood HJJ. Intermediate cementum. Br Dent J 1957;102:345-350.
26. Vacel JS, Gher ME. Cementum anomalies of the dentogingival junction. Int J Perio Rest Dent 1993; 5: 443-449.
27. Bosshardt DD, Selving KA. Dental cementum: The dynamic tissue covering the root. Periodontol 2000 1997; 13: 41-75.
28. Apicella A, Raddi S, Ausiello P, et al. FEM study of shrinkage stress build-up on adhesive restorations. J Dent Res 1997; 76;49 (Abstr 435).
29. Eick JD, Welch FH. Polymerization shrinkage of posterior composite resins and its possible influence on postoperative sensitivity. Quint Int 1986; 17: 103-111.
30. Cox CF. Evaluation and treatment of bacterial microleakage. Am J Dent 1994; 7: 293-295.
31. Bayne SC, Heymann HO, Wilder AD, et al. Clinical performance of bonding systems with and without hybrid layers. J Dent Res 1996; 75: 23 (Abstr 47).
32. Sano H, Takatsu T, Ciucchi B, et al. Nanoleakage: Leakage within the hybrid layer. Oper Dent 1995; 20: 18-25.
33. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Pang KM, et al. Variability in microleakage observed in a total-etch wet-bonding technique under different handling conditions. J Dent Res 1995; 74: 1168-1178.
34. Tay FR, Gwinnett AJ, Wei SHY. Ultrastructure of the resin-dentin interface following reversible and irreversible rewetting. Am J Dent 1997; 10:77-82.
35. Wakabayashi Y, Kondou Y, Suzuki K, et al. Effect of dissolution of collagen on adhesion to dentin. Int J Prosthodont 1994; 7: 302-306.
36. Kanca J. Investigation into dentin adhesion mechanism. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 277 (Abstr 2111).
37. Gwinnett AJ. Chemically conditioned dentin: A comparison of conventional and environment scanning electron microscopy findings. Dent Mater 1994; 10: 150-155.
38. Vichi A, Ferrari M, Davidson CL. In vivo leakage of an adhesive system with and without NaOC1 as preatreatment. J Dent Res 1997; 76: 398 (Abstr 3077).
39. Nakabayashi N, Ashizawa M, Nakamura M. Identification of a resin-dentin hybrid layer in vital human dentin created in vivo: Durable bonding to vital dentin. Quint Int 1992; 23: 135-141.
40. Titley K, Chernecky R, Chan A, et al. The composition and ultrastructure of resin tags in etched dentine. Am J Dent 1995; 8: 224-230.
41. Mello FS-TC, Feilzer AJ, De Gee AJ, et al. The influence of the presence of a bonding layer on marginal sealing of resin composite Class II restorations. J Dent Res 1996;75;26 (Abstr 224).
42. Attal JP, Degrange M. Influence de l'orientation des prismes et du traitment de surface sur l'adhesion et l'adherence a l'email. J Biomater Dent 1996; 11: 41-57.
43. Dietschi D, Spreafico R. Adhesive metal-free restorations. Current concepts for the esthetic treatment of posterior teeth. Berlin: Quintessence, 1997.
44. Radlanski RJ, Jager A, Seidi W, et al. Uber die ausrichtung der prismen im zahnschmelz menschlicher permanenter zahne. Anat Anz. 1990; 170: 329-337.
45. th international symposium on dental morphology. Berlin: C & M Brunne, 1995.
46. Munechika T, Suzuki K, Nishiyama M, et al. A comparison of the tensile bond strengths of composite resins to longitudinal and transverse sections of enamel prisms in human teeth. J Dent Res 1984;63:1079-1082.
47. Fernandes CP, Chevitarese O. The orientation and direction of rods in dental enamel. J Prosthet Dent 1991; 65: 793-800.
48. Martin T. Schmelzmikrostrukturen bei Saugetieren. In: Alt KW, Tucrp J. Die evolution der zahne. Phylogenie-ontogenie-variation. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1997.
49. Pfretzschner HU. Biomeehanik des zahnschmelzes. In: Alt KW, Tucrp J. Die evolution der zahne. Phylogenie-ontogenie-variation. Berlin: Quintessenz, 1997.
50. Gwinnett AJ, Tay FR, Pang KM, et al. Comparison of three methods of critical evaluation of microleakage along restorative interfaces. J Prosthet Dent 1995; 74: 575-585.