Microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorations with three dentin bonding agents

Operative Dentistry

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 19-24

  Alavi, A A ^a   Kianimanesh, N ^a  

^a SHIRAZ UNIVERSITY OF MEDICAL SCIENCES   (Iran)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DENTIN BONDING AGENT; EXCITE CEMENT; METHACRYLIC ACID DERIVATIVE; RESIN; RESIN CEMENT; SCOTCHBOND MULTI PURPOSE PLUS; SCOTCHBOND MULTI-PURPOSE PLUS; SYNTAC DENTINE ADHESIVE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL SURGERY; METHODOLOGY; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; RANDOMIZATION; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANIMALS; CATTLE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL BONDING; DENTAL LEAKAGE; DENTAL RESTORATION, PERMANENT; DENTIN-BONDING AGENTS; INLAYS; METHACRYLATES; RANDOM ALLOCATION; RESIN CEMENTS; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC;

EID: 0036365175     PISSN: 03617734     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Ario PD (1997) Shear bond strength of a new 3M dental adhesive Journal of Dental Research 76 186 (abstract).
2. Castelnuovo J, Tjan AH & Liu P (1996) Microleakage of multi-step and simplified-step bonding systems American Journal of Dentistry 9(6) 245-248.
3. Dietschi D, Siebenthal G, NeveuRosenstand L & Holz J (1995) Influence of the restorative technique and new adhesives on the dentin marginal seal and adaptation of resin composite Class II restoration: An in vitro evaluation Quintessence International 26(10) 717-727.
4. Douglas WH, Fields RP & Fundingsland J (1989) A comparison between the microleakage of direct and indirect composite restorative systems Journal of Dentistry 17 187-188.
5. Feilzer AJ, de Gee AJ & Davidson CL (1987) Setting stress in composite resin in relation to configuration of the restorations Journal of Dental Research 66(11) 1636-1639.
6. Griffiths BM & Watson TF (1995) Resin-dentin interface of Scotchbond Multi-Purpose dentin adhesive American Journal of Dentistry 8(4) 212-216.
7. Hasegawa T, Itoh K, Koike T, Yukitani W, Hisamitsu H, Wakumoto S & Fujishima A (1999) Effect of mechanical properties of resin composites on the efficacy of the dentin bonding systems Operative Dentistry 24(6) 323-330.
8. Latta MA, Wilwerding TM, Barkmeier WW & Los SA (1997) Laboratory evaluation of one-component dental adhesive Journal of Dental Research 76 186 (abstract).
9. Pashley DH & Carvalho RM (1997) Dentine permeability and dentine adhesion Journal of Dentistry 25(5) 355-372.
10. Perdigão J, Baratieri L & Lopez M (1999) Laboratory evaluation and clinical application of a new one-bottle adhesive Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11(1) 23-35.
11. Pilo R & Ben-Amar A (1999) Comparison of microleakage for three one-bottle and three multi-step dentin bonding agents Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 82(2) 209-213.
12. Reeves GW, Fitchie JG, Hembree JH & Puckett AD (1995) Microleakage of new dentin bonding systems using human and bovine teeth Operative Dentistry 20(6) 230-235.
13. Retief DH (1994) Do adhesive prevent microleakage? International Dental Journal 44(1) 19-26.
14. Robinson PB, Moore BK & Swartz, ML(1987) Comparison of microleakage in direct and indirect composite resin restorations in vitro Operative Dentistry 12(3) 113-116.
15. Ruyter IE (1992) Types of resin-based inlay materials and their properties International Dental Journal 42(3) 139-144.
16. Saunders WP & Saunders EM (1996) Microleakage of bonding agents with wet and dry bonding techniques American Journal of Dentistry 9(1) 34-36.
17. Swift EJ, Perdigão J & Heymann HO (1995) Bonding to enamel and dentin: A brief history and state of the art Quintessence International 26(2) 95-110.
18. Swift EJ, Perdigāo J, Heymann HO & Ritter A (1999) Shear bond strength of one-bottle adhesives to moist enamel Journal of Esthetic Dentistry 11(2) 103-107.