Assessing systematic error in the inference of seed plant phylogeny

International Journal of Plant Sciences

Volumn 168, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 125-135

  Burleigh, J Gordon ^a   Mathews, Sarah ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

Gnetales; Multigene analysis; Parametric bootstrapping; Phylogeny; Seed plants; Systematic error

Indexed keywords

ANGIOSPERM; BOOTSTRAPPING; DATA SET; GENETIC ANALYSIS; GENETIC MARKER; GENETIC VARIATION; GYMNOSPERM; MAXIMUM LIKELIHOOD ANALYSIS; PARSIMONY ANALYSIS; PHYLOGENETICS; PHYLOGENY; SIBLING;

GNETALES; MAGNOLIOPHYTA; SPERMATOPHYTA;

EID: 33847212859     PISSN: 10585893     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1086/509588     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Ané C, JG Burleigh, MM McMahon, MJ Sanderson 2005 Covarion structure in plastid genome evolution: a new statistical test. Mol Biol Evol 22:914-924.
2. Bowe LM, G Coat, CW de Pamphilis 2000 Phylogeny of seed plants based on all three genomic compartments: extant gymnosperms are monophyletic and Gnetales' closest relatives are conifers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4092-4097.
3. Brandley MC, A Schmitz, TW Reeder 2005 Partitioned Bayesian analyses, partition choice, and the phylogenetic relationships of scincid lizards. Syst Biol 54:373-390.
4. Brinkmann H, H Philippe 1999 Atchaea sister group of bacteria? indications from tree reconstruction artifacts in ancient phylogenies. Mol Biol Evol 16:817-825.
5. Buckley TR 2002 Model misspecification and probabilistic tests of topology: evidence from empirical data sets. Syst Biol 51:509-523.
6. Burleigh JG, S Mathews 2004 Phylogenetic signal in nucleotide data from seed plants: implications for resolving the seed plant tree of life. Am J Bot 91:1599-1613.
7. - 2007 Assessing among-locus variation in the inference of seed plant phylogeny. Int J Plant Sci 168:111-124.
8. Chaw S-M, CL Parkinson, Y Cheng, TM Vincent, JD Palmer 2000 Seed plant phylogeny inferred from all three plant genomes: monophyly of extant gymnosperms and the origin of Gnetales from conifers. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:4086-4091.
9. Crane PR 1985 Phylogenetic analysis of seed plants and the origin of angiosperms. Ann Mo Bot Gard 72:716-793.
10. Donoghue MJ, JA Doyle 2000 Seed plant phylogeny: demise of the anthophyte hypothesis? Curr Biol 10:R106-R109.
11. Doyle JA 1996 Seed plant phylogeny and the relationships of Gnetales. Int J Plant Sci 157(suppl):S3-S39.
12. - 1998a Molecules, morphology, fossils, and the relationship of angiosperms and Gnetales. Mol Phylogenet Evol 9:448-462.
13. - 1998b Phylogeny of vascular plants. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 9:365-392.
14. - 2006 Seed ferns and the origin of angiosperms. J Torrey Bot Soc 133:169-209.
15. Doyle JA, MJ Donoghue 1986 Seed plant phylogeny and the origin of angiosperms: an experimental cladistic approach. Bot Rev 52:321-431.
16. Felsenstein J 1985 Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 38:16-24.
17. - 2004 Inferring phylogenies. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
18. Frohlich MW, Parker DS 2000 The mostly male theory of flower evolutionary origins: from genes to fossils. Syst Bot 25:155-170.
19. Gadagkar SR, S Kumar 2005 Maximum likelihood outperforms maximum parsimony even when evolutionary rates are heterotachous. Mol Biol Evol 22:2139-2141.
20. Gaucher EA, MM Miyamoto 2005 A call for likelihood phylogenetics even when the process of sequence is heterogeneous. Mol Phylogenet Evol 37:928-931.
21. Hasegawa M, H Kishino, T Yano 1985 Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol 22:160-174.
22. Hilton J, RM Bateman 2006 Pteridosperms are the backbone of seed-plant phylogeny. J Torrey Bot Soc 133:119-168.
23. Huelsenbeck JP, DM Hillis, R Jones 1996 Parametric bootstrapping in molecular phylogenetics: applications and performance. Pages 19-45 in JD Ferraris, SR Palumbi, eds. Molecular zoology: advances, strategies, and protocols. Wiley-Liss, New York.
24. Kolaczkowski B, JW Thornton 2004 Performance of maximum parsimony and likelihood phylogenetics when evolution is heterogeneous. Nature 431:980-984.
25. Kosakovsky Pond SL, DW Frost, SV Muse 2005 HyPhy: hypothesis testing using phylogenies. Bioinformatics 21:676-679.
26. Magallon S, MJ Sanderson 2002 Relationships among seed plants inferred from highly conserved genes: sorting conflicting phylogenetic signals among ancient lineages. Am J Bot 89:1991-2006.
27. Parenti LR 1980 A phylogenetic analysis of the land plants. Biol J Linn Soc 13:225-242.
28. Philippe H, P Lopez, H Brinkmann, K Budin, A Germot, J Laurent, D Moreira, M Müller, H Le Guyader 2000 Early-branching or fast evolving eukaryotes? an answer based on slowly evolving positions. Proc Biol Sci 267:1213-1221.
29. Philippe H, Y Zhou, H Brinkmann, N Rodrigue, F Delsuc 2005 Heterotachy and long-branch attraction in phylogenetics. BMC Evol Biol 5:50.
30. Phillips MJ, F Delsuc, D Penny 2004 Genome-scale phylogeny and the detection of systematic biases. Mol Biol Evol 21:1455-1458.
31. Pisani D 2004 Identifying and removing fast-evolving sites using compatibility analysis: an example from the arthropods. Syst Biol 53:978-989.
32. Rai HS, HE O'Brian, PA Reeves, RG Olmstead, SW Graham 2003 Inference of higher-order relationships in the cycads from a large chloroplast data set. Mol Phylogenet Evol 29:350-359.
33. Rogers JS 2001 Maximum likelihood estimation of phylogenetic trees is consistent when substitution rates vary according to the invariable sites plus gamma distribution. Syst Biol 50:713-722.
34. Rokas A, BL Williams, N King, SB Carroll 2003 Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798-804.
35. Rothwell GR, RSebert 1994 Lignophyte phylogeny and the evolution of spermatophytes: a numerical cladistic analysis. Syst Bot 19:443-482.
36. Rydin C, M Källersjö, EM Friis 2002 Seed plant relationships and the systematic position of Gnetales based on nuclear and chloroplast DNA: conflicting data, rooting problems, and the monophyly of conifers. Int J Plant Sci 163:197-214.
37. Saitou N, M Nei 1987 The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 4:406-425.
38. Sanderson MJ, MF Wojciechowski, J-M Hu, TS Khan, SG Brady 2000 Error, bias, and long-branch attraction in data for two chloroplast photosystem genes in seed plants. Mol Biol Evol 17:782-797.
39. Simmons MP, L-B Zhang, CT Webb, A Reeves, JA Miller 2006 The relative performance of Bayesian and parsimony approaches when sampling characters under homogeneous and heterogeneous sets of parameters. Cladistics 22:171-185.
40. Soltis DE, VA Albert, V Savolainen, K Hilu, Y-L Qiu, MW Chase, JS Farris, et al 2004 Genome-scale data, angiosperm relationships, and "ending incongruence": a cautionary tale in phylogenetics. Trends Plant Sci 9:477-483.
41. Soltis DE, PS Soltis, MJ Zanis 2002 Phylogeny of seed plants based on evidence from eight genes. Am J Bot 89:1670-1681.
42. Spencer M, E Susko, AJ Roger 2005 Likelihood, parsimony, and heterogeneous evolution. Mol Biol Evol 22:1161-1164.
43. Stanger-Hall K, CW Cunningham 1998 Support for a monophyletic lemuriformes: overcoming incongruence between data partitions. Mol Biol Evol 15:1572-1577.
44. Stefanovic S, M Jager, J Deutsch, J Broutin, M Masselot 1998 Phylogenetic relationships of conifers inferred from partial 28S rRNA gene sequences. Am J Bot 85:688-697.
45. Stefanovic S, DW Rice, JD Palmer 2004 Long branch attraction, taxon sampling, and the earliest angiosperms: Amborella or monocots? BMC Evol Biol 4:35.
46. Sullivan J, DL Swofford 2001 Should we use model-based methods for phylogenetic inference when we know that assumptions about among-site rate variation and nucleotide substitution pattern are violated? Syst Biol 50:723-729.
47. Swofford DL 2002 PAUP": phylogenetic analysis using parsimony ("and other methods), version 4.0b10. Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
48. Swofford DL, PJ Waddell, JP Huelsenbeck, PG Foster, PO Lewis, JS Rogers 2001 Bias in phylogenetic estimation and its relevance to the choice between parsimony and likelihood methods. Syst Biol 50: 525-539.
49. Tavaré S 1986 Some probabilistic and statistical problems on the analysis of DNA sequences. Pages 57-86 in RM Miura, ed. Lectures on mathematics in life sciences. American Mathematics Society, Providence, RI.
50. Wilgenbush J, K de Queiroz 2000 Phylogenetic relationships among the phrynosomatid sand lizards inferred from mitochondrial DNA sequences generated by heterogeneous evolutionary processes. Syst Biol 49:592-612.
51. Won H, SS Renner 2003 Horizontal gene transfer from flowering plants to Gnetum. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:10824-10829.
52. Yang Z 1994 Maximizing likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol 39:306-314.