Parametric biomedical imaging - What defines the quality of quantitative radiological approaches?;Parametrische biomedizinische bildgebung - Was macht die qualität quantitativer radiologischer verfahren aus?

RoFo Fortschritte auf dem Gebiet der Rontgenstrahlen und der Bildgebenden Verfahren

Volumn 178, Issue 12, 2006, Pages 1187-1201

  Glüer, Claus Christian ^a   Barkmann, R ^a   Hahn, H K ^b   Majumdar, S ^c   Eckstein, F ^d   Nickelsen, T N ^e   Bolte, H ^a   Dicken, V ^b   Heller, M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL SCHLESWIG HOLSTEIN   (Germany)

^b FRAUNHOFER MEVIS   (Germany)

^c UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^d PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^e LILLY DEUTSCHLAND GMBH   (Germany)

Author keywords

Early diagnosis; Functional imaging; Molecular imaging; Parametric imaging; Quantitative radiology; Therapy monitoring

Indexed keywords

ANGIOGENESIS; DISEASE COURSE; EARLY DIAGNOSIS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HUMAN; IMAGE QUALITY; LUNG PARENCHYMA; MOLECULAR IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; PATIENT MONITORING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGNOSIS; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REVIEW; VOLUMETRY; ALGORITHM; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; DIAGNOSTIC ERROR; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; FOLLOW UP; IMAGE PROCESSING; METHODOLOGY; NEOPLASM; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; RADIOGRAPHY; REFERENCE VALUE; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SINGLE PHOTON EMISSION COMPUTER TOMOGRAPHY; STANDARD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; TIME; TUMOR VOLUME; VASCULARIZATION;

CONTRAST MEDIUM;

ALGORITHMS; CONTRAST MEDIA; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; DIAGNOSTIC ERRORS; DIAGNOSTIC IMAGING; DISEASE PROGRESSION; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; NEOPLASMS; OSTEOARTHRITIS; OSTEOPOROSIS; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINES; PROGNOSIS; REFERENCE VALUES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TIME FACTORS; TOMOGRAPHY, EMISSION-COMPUTED, SINGLE-PHOTON; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED; TUMOR BURDEN;

EID: 33847002338     PISSN: 14389029     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-2006-926973     Document Type: Review

References (98)

1. Deoni SC, Rutt BK, Peters TM. Rapid combined T1 and T2 mapping using gradient recalled acquisition in the steady state. Magn Reson Med 2003; 49: 515-526
2. Fox NC, Freeborough PA, Rossor MN. Visualisation and quantification of rates of atrophy in Alzheimer's disease. Lancet 1996; 348: 94-97
3. Brix G, Schreiber W, Hoffmann U et al. Methodische Ansätze zur quantitativen Beurteilung der Mikrozirkulation im Gewebe mit der dynamischen Magnetresonanztomographie. Radiologe 1997; 37: 470-480
4. Schlüter M, Stieltjes B, Hahn HK et al. Detection of tumor infiltration in white matter fiber bundles using diffusion tensor imaging. Int J Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 2005; 1: 80-86
5. Nielsen G, Fritz-Hansen T, Dirks CG et al. Evaluation of heart perfusion in patients with acute myocardial infarction using dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging. J Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 20: 403-410
6. Fink C, Risse F, Buhmann R et al. Quantitative Analyse der Lungenperfusion mittels zeitaufgelöster paralleler 3D-TRT: Erste Ergebnisse. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 170-174
7. Lehmann F, Knitz F, Weiler N et al. Ein Auswerteprogramm zur quantitativen Untersuchung der Lungenventilation mittels dynamischer MRT von hochpolarisiertem 3He. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1399-1408
8. Lehmann F, Eberle B, Markstaller K et al. Ein Auswerteprogramm zur quantitativen Analyse von Messungen des alveolären Sauerstoffpartialdrucks (pAO2) mit der sauerstoffsensitiven 3He-MR-Tomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1390-1398
9. Knopp MV, von Tengg-Kobligk H, Choyke PL. Functional magnetic resonance imaging in oncology for diagnosis and therapy monitoring. Mol Cancer Ther 2003; 2: 419-426
10. Golay X, Hendrikse J, Lim TC. Perfusion imaging using arterial spin labeling. Top Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 15: 10-27
11. Logothetis NK, Pfeuffer J. On the nature of the BOLD fMRI contrast mechanism. Magn Reson Imaging 2004; 22: 1517-1531
12. Foo SS, Abbott DF, Lawrentschuk N et al. Functional imaging of intratumoral hypoxia. Mol Imaging Biol 2004; 6: 291-305
13. Delbeke D, Martin WH. Metabolic imaging with FDG: a primer. Cancer J 2004; 10: 201-213
14. Seddon BM, Workman P. The role of functional and molecular imaging in cancer drug discovery and development. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: S128-138
15. Friston KJ, Penny W. Posterior probability maps and SPMs. Neuroimage 2003; 19: 1240-1249
16. Lee HY, Paeng JC, Lee DS et al. Efficacy assessment of cerebral arterial bypass surgery using statistical parametric mapping and probabilistic brain atlas on basal/acetazolamide brain perfusion SPECT. J Nucl Med 2004; 45: 202-206
17. Berthold LD, Moritz JD, Soenksen S et al. Messung der Knochendichte bei Kindern und Jugendlichen mittels quantitativer CT an nur einem Lendenwirbelkörper. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 292-297
18. Cummings SR, Bates D, Black DM. Clinical use of bone densitometry: scientific review. Jama 2002; 288: 1889-197
19. Khaw KT, Reeve J, Luben R et al. Prediction of total and hip fracture risk in men and women by quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus: EPIC-Norfolk prospective population study. Lancet 2004; 363: 197-202
20. van Lenthe GH, van den Bergh JP, Hermus AR et al. The prospects of estimating trabecular bone tissue properties from the combination of ultrasound, dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, microcomputed tomography, and microfinite element analysis. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 550-555
21. Jacobs MA, Ouwerkerk R, Wolff AC et al. Multiparametric and multinuclear magnetic resonance imaging of human breast cancer: current applications. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2004; 3: 543-550
22. Erasmus JJ, Gladish GW, Broemeling L et al. Interobserver and intraobserver variability in measurement of non-small-cell carcinoma lung lesions: implications for assessment of tumor response. J Clin Oncol 2003; 21: 2574-2582
23. Bornemann L, Kuhnigk JM, Dicken V et al. Informatics in radiology (infoRAD): new tools for computer assistance in thoracic CT part 2. Therapy monitoring of pulmonary metastases. Radiographics 2005; 25: 841-848
24. Bolte H, Riedel C, Jahnke T et al. Reproducibility of computer-aided volumetry of artificial small pulmonary nodules in ex vivo porcine lungs. Invest Radiol 2006; 41: 28-35
25. Mayr NA, Taoka T, Yuh WT et al. Method and timing of tumor volume measurement for outcome prediction in cervical cancer using magnetic resonance imaging. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 2002; 52: 14-22
26. Bremer C, Mustafa M, Bogdanov AJr et al. Steady-state blood volume measurements in experimental tumors with different angiogenic burdens a study in mice. Radiology 2003; 226: 214-220
27. Kerwin W, Hooker A, Spilker M et al. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of neovasculature volume in carotid atherosclerotic plaque. Circulation 2003; 107: 851-856
28. Willett CG, Boucher Y, di Tomaso E et al. Direct evidence that the VEGF-specific antibody bevacizumab has antivascular effects in human rectal cancer. Nat Med 2004; 10: 145-147
29. Brix G, Kiessling F, Lucht R et al. Microcirculation and microvasculature in breast tumors: pharmacokinetic analysis of dynamic MR image series. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 420-429
30. Scherer A, Strupp C, Wittsack HJ et al. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for evaluating bone marrow microcirculation in malignant hematological diseases before and after thalidomide therapy. Radiologe 2002; 42: 222-230
31. Maier CF, Paran Y, Bendel P et al. Quantitative diffusion imaging in implanted human breast tumors. Magn Reson Med 1997; 37: 576-581
32. Padhani AR. MRI for assessing antivascular cancer treatments. Br J Radiol 2003; 76: S60-80
33. Detre JA, Samuels OB, Alsop DC et al. Noninvasive magnetic resonance imaging evaluation of cerebral blood flow with acetazolamide challenge in patients with cerebrovascular stenosis. J Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 10: 870-875
34. Leach MO, Brindle KM, Evelhoch JL et al. Assessment of antiangiogenic and antivascular therapeutics using MRI: recommendations for appropriate methodology for clinical trials. BrJ Radiol 2003; 76: S87-91
35. Jackson A, Kassner A, Zhu XP et al. Reproducibility of T2* blood volume and vascular tortuosity maps in cerebral gliomas. J Magn Reson Imaging 2001; 14: 510-516
36. Yang M, Baranov E, Li XM et al. Whole-body and intravital optical imaging of angiogenesis in orthotopically implanted tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 2001; 98: 2616-2621
37. Winter PM, Morawski AM, Caruthers SD et al. Molecular imaging of angiogenesis in early-stage atherosclerosis with alpha(v)beta3-integrin-targeted nanoparticles. Circulation 2003; 108: 2270-2274
38. Schmieder AH, Winter PM, Caruthers SD et al. Molecular MR imaging of melanoma angiogenesis with alphanubeta3-targeted paramagnetic nanoparticles. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 621-627
39. Dahnke H, Schaeffter T. Limits of detection of SPIO at 3.0 T using T2 relaxometry. Magn Reson Med 2005; 53: 1202-1206
40. Selle D, Preim B, Schenk A et al. Analysis of vasculature for liver surgical planning. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 2002; 21: 1344-1357
41. Ravenel JG, McAdams HP, Remy-Jardin M et al. Multidimensional imaging of the thorax: practical applications. J Thorac Imaging 2001; 16: 269-281
42. Bankier AA, De Maertelaer V, Keyzer C et al. Pulmonary emphysema: subjective visual grading versus objective quantification with macroscopic morphometry and thin-section CT densitometry. Radiology 1999; 211: 851-858
43. Achenbach T, Weinheimer O, Buschsieweke C et al. Vollautomatische Detektion und Quantifizierung des Lungenemphysems in Dünnschicht-MD-CT des Thorax durch eine neue, speziell entwickelte Software. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1409-1415
44. Kalender WA, Rienmuller R, Seissler W et al. Measurement of pulmonary parenchymal attenuation: use of spirometric gating with quantitative CT. Radiology 1990; 175: 265-268
45. Kircher MF, Mahmood U, King RS et al. A multimodal nanoparticle for preoperative magnetic resonance imaging and intraoperative optical brain tumor delineation. Cancer Res 2003; 63: 8122-8125
46. De Grand AM, Frangioni JV. An operational near-infrared fluorescence imaging system prototype for large animal surgery. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2003; 2: 553-562
47. Parungo CP, Ohnishi S, De Grand AM et al. In vivo optical imaging of pleural space drainage to lymph nodes of prognostic significance. Ann Surg Oncol 2004; 11: 1085-1092
48. Link TM, Vieth V, Stehling C et al. High-resolution MRI vs multislice spiral CT: which technique depicts the trabecular bone structure best? Eur Radiol 2003; 13: 663-671
49. Laib A, Beuf O, Issever A et al. Direct measures of trabecular bone architecture from MR images. Adv Exp Med Biol 2001; 496: 37-46
50. Bauer JS, Kohlmann S, Eckstein F et al. Structural analysis of trabecular bone of the proximal femur using multislice computed tomography: a comparison with dual X-ray absorptiometry for predicting biomechanical strength in vitro. Calcif Tissue Int 2006; 78: 78-89
51. Link TM, Majumdar S, Lin JC et al. A comparative study of trabecular bone properties in the spine and femur using high resolution MRI and CT. J Bone Miner Res 1998; 13: 122-132
52. Kang C, Paley M, Ordidge R et al. R'2 measured in trabecular bone in vitro: relationship to trabecular separation. Magn Reson Imaging 1999; 17: 989-995
53. Beuf O, Newitt DC, Mosekilde L et al. Trabecular structure assessment in lumbar vertebrae specimens using quantitative magnetic resonance imaging and relationship with mechanical competence. J Bone Miner Res 2001; 16: 1511-1519
54. Wehrli FW, Hopkins JA, Hwang SN et al. Cross-sectional study of osteopenia with quantitative MR imaging and bone densitometry. Radiology 2000; 217: 527-538
55. Nuzzo S, Peyrin F, Cloetens P et al. Quantification of the degree of mineralization of bone in three dimensions using synchrotron radiation microtomography. Med Phys 2002; 29: 2672-2681
56. Roschger P, Rinnerthaler S, Yates J et al. Alendronate increases degree and uniformity of mineralization in cancellous bone and decreases the porosity in cortical bone of osteoporotic women. Bone 2001; 29: 185-191
57. Crawford RP, Keaveny TM. Relationship between axial and bending behaviors of the human thoracolumbar vertebra. Spine 2004; 29: 2248-2255
58. Graichen H, von Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T et al. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 811-816
59. Eckstein F, Charles HC, Buck RJ et al. Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T. Arthritis Rheum 2005; 52: 3132-3136
60. Eckstein F, Cicuttini F, Raynauld JP et al. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of articular cartilage in knee osteoarthritis (OA): morphological assessment. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2006; 14 Suppl A: A46-A75
61. Cicuttini FM, Wluka AE, Wang Yet al. Longitudinal study of changes in tibial and femoral cartilage in knee osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2004; 50: 94-97
62. Eckstein F, Lemberger B, Gratzke C et al. In vivo cartilage deformation after different types of activity and its dependence on physical training status. Ann Rheum Dis 2005; 64: 291-295
63. O'Byrne E, Pellas T, Laurent D. Qualitative and quantitative in vivo assessment of articular cartilage using magnetic resonance imaging. Novartis Found Symp 2003; 249: 190-198; discussion 8-202, 34-38, 39-41
64. Bashir A, Gray ML, Boutin RD et al. Glycosaminoglycan in articular cartilage: in vivo assessment with delayed Gd(DTPA)(2-)-enhanced MR imaging. Radiology 1997; 205: 551-558
65. Dardzinski BJ, Mosher TJ, Li S et al. Spatial variation of T2 in human articular cartilage. Radiology 1997; 205: 546-550
66. Williams A, Gillis A, McKenzie C et al. Glycosaminoglycan distribution in cartilage as determined by delayed gadolinium-enhanced MRI of cartilage (dGEMRIC): potential clinical applications. AJR 2004; 182: 167-172
67. Lusse S, Claassen H, Gehrke T et al. Evaluation of water content by spatially resolved transverse relaxation times of human articular cartilage. Magn Reson Imaging 2000; 18: 423-430
68. Nieminen MT, Rieppo J, Toyras J et al. T2 relaxation reveals spatial collagen architecture in articular cartilage: a comparative quantitative MRI and polarized light microscopic study. Magn Reson Med 2001; 46: 487-493
69. Liess C, Lusse S, Karger N et al. Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002; 10: 907-913
70. Felson DT, Nevitt MC. Epidemiologic studies for osteoarthritis: new versus conventional study design approaches. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2004; 30: 783-797, vii
71. Shah N, Sattar A, Benanti M et al. Magnetic resonance spectroscopy as an imaging tool for cancer: a review of the literature. J Am Osteopath Assoc 2006; 106: 23-27
72. Tatlisumak T, Strbian D, Abo Ramadan U et al. The role of diffusion-and perfusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging in drug development for ischemic stroke: from laboratory to clinics. Curr Vasc Pharmacol 2004; 2: 343-355
73. Filippi M, Rocca MA, Comi G. The use of quantitative magnetic-resonance- based techniques to monitor the evolution of multiple sclerosis. Lancet Neurol 2003; 2: 337-346
74. Giesel FL, Wustenberg T, Bongers A et al. MR-basierte Methoden der funktioneilen Bildgebung des zentralen Nervensystems. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 714-730
75. 3Helium- Magnetresonanztomographie. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2005; 177: 660-669
76. Lorenzen J, Sinkus R, Adam G. Elastographie: Quantitative Bildgebung der elastischen Gewebeeigenschaften. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2003; 175: 623-630
77. Borsook D, Becerra L, Hargreaves R. A role for fMRI in optimizing CNS drug development. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2006; 5: 411-425
78. Mankoff DA, Shields AF, Krohn KA. PET imaging of cellular proliferation. Radiol Clin North Am 2005; 43: 153-167
79. Weber WA. Use of PET for monitoring cancer therapy and for predicting outcome. J Nucl Med 2005; 46: 983-995
80. Nekolla SG. Dynamic and gated PET: quantitative imaging of the heart revisited. Nuklearmedizin 2005; 44: S41-45
81. Musch G, Venegas JG. Positron emission tomography imaging of regional pulmonary perfusion and ventilation. Proc Am Thorac Soc 2005; 2: 522-527, 08-09
82. Wang YX. Medical imaging in pharmaceutical clinical trials: what radiologists should know. Clin Radiol 2005; 60: 1051-1057
83. Delorme S, Krix M, Albrecht T. Ultraschallkontrastmittel - Grundlagen und klinische Anwendung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2006; 178: 155-164
84. Lemke AJ, Chopra SS, Hengst SA et al. Charakterisierung von Lebertumoren durch kontrastverstärkte Sonographie und digitale Graustufenbestimmung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 1607-1616
85. Bauer JS, Issever AS, Fischbeck M et al. Charakterisierung von Lebertumoren durch kontrastverstärkte Sonographie und digitale Graustufenbestimmung. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 709-718
86. Mohr A, Barkmann R, Mohr C et al. Quantitativer Ultraschall zur Osteoporosediagnostik. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2004; 176: 610-617
87. Leary SM, Miller DH, Stevenson VL et al. Interferon beta-1a in primary progressive MS: an exploratory, randomized, controlled trial. Neurology 2003; 60: 44-51
88. Rexilius J, Hahn HK, Schluter M et al. Evaluation of accuracy in MS lesion volumetry using realistic lesion phantoms. Acad Radiol 2005; 12: 17-24
89. Hahn HK, Jolly B, Lee M et al. How accurate is brain volumetry? Lecture notes in computer science 2004; 3216: 335-342
90. Glüer CC, Blake G, Lu Y et al. Accurate assessment of precision errors: how to measure the reproducibility of bone densitometry techniques. Osteoporos Int 1995; 5: 262-270
91. Metz CE, Herman BA, Roe CA. Statistical comparison of two ROC-curve estimates obtained from partially-paired datasets. Med Decis Making 1998; 18: 110-121
92. Glüer CC. Monitoring skeletal changes by radiological techniques. J Bone Miner Res 1999; 14: 1952-1962
93. nd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, 2001
94. Kalender WA, Felsenberg D, Genant HK et al. The European Spine Phantom - a tool for standardization and quality control in spinal bone mineral measurements by DXA and QCT. Eur J Radiol 1995; 20: 83-92
95. Cummings SR, Parfitt AM. Bone density regression to the mean and the individual patient. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86: 4001-4002
96. Ren H, Shen Q, Bardutzky J et al. Partial-volume effect on ischemic tissue-fate delineation using quantitative perfusion and diffusion imaging on a rat stroke model. Magn Reson Med 2004; 52: 1328-1335
97. Crum WR, Hartkens T, Hill DL. Non-rigid image registration: theory and practice. Br J Radiol 2004; 77: S140-153
98. Fischer B, Modersitzki J. Intensity-based image registration with a guaranteed one-to-one point match. Methods Inf Med 2004; 43: 327-330