Accuracy and precision of quantitative assessment of cartilage morphology by magnetic resonance imaging at 3.0T

Arthritis and Rheumatism

Volumn 52, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 3132-3136

  Eckstein, Felix ^a,b   Charles, H Cecil ^c   Buck, Robert J ^d,e   Kraus, Virginia B ^f   Remmers, Ann E ^d,e   Hudelmaier, Martin ^a,b   Wirth, Wolfgang ^a,b   Evelhoch, Jeffrey L ^d,e  

^a PARACELSUS MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Austria)

^b Chondrometrics GmbH   (Germany)

^c DUKE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^d AMGEN INC   (United States)

^e PFIZER INC   (United States)

^f DUKE UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CARTILAGE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; FEMALE; HUMAN; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGING; MEASUREMENT; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; OSTEOARTHRITIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; REPRODUCIBILITY;

AGED; CARTILAGE; FEMALE; FEMUR; HUMANS; KNEE JOINT; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MIDDLE AGED; OSTEOARTHRITIS, KNEE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; TIBIA;

EID: 26844466590     PISSN: 00043591     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/art.21348     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Gray ML, Eckstein F, Peterfy C, Dahlberg L, Kim YJ, Sorensen AG. Toward imaging biomarkers for osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop 2004;427 Suppl:S175-81.
2. Eckstein F, Glaser C. Measuring cartilage morphology with quantitative magnetic resonance imaging. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2004;8:329-53.
3. Peterfy CG. Role of MR imaging in clinical research studies. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 2001;5:365-78.
4. Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hyhlik-Durr A, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Magnetic resonance imaging-based assessment of cartilage loss in severe osteoarthritis: accuracy, precision, and diagnostic value. Arthritis Rheum 2001;44:2072-7.
5. Burgkart R, Glaser C, Hinterwimmer S, Hudelmaier M, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, et al. Feasibility of T and Z scores from magnetic resonance imaging data for quantification of cartilage loss in osteoarthritis. Arthritis Rheum 2003;48:2829-35.
6. Graichen H, Eisenhart-Rothe R, Vogl T, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F. Quantitative assessment of cartilage status in osteoarthritis by quantitative magnetic resonance imaging: technical validation for use in analysis of cartilage volume and further morphologic parameters. Arthritis Rheum 2004;50:811-6.
7. Gold GE, Han E, Stainsby J, Wright G, Brittain J, Beaulieu C. Musculoskeletal MRI at 3.0T: relaxation times and image contrast. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2004;183:343-51.
8. Peterfy C, Li J, Zaim S, Duryea J, Lynch J, Miaux Y, et al. Comparison of fixed-flexion positioning with fluoroscopic semi-flexed positioning for quantifying radiographic joint-space width in the knee: test-retest reproducibility. Skeletal Radiol 2003;32: 128-32.
9. Kellgren JH, Lawrence JS. Radiological assessment of osteoarthrosis. Ann Rheum Dis 1957;16:494-501.
10. Glaser C, Burgkart R, Kutschera A, Englmeier KH, Reiser M, Eckstein F. Femoro-tibial cartilage metrics from coronal MR image data: technique, test-retest reproducibility, and findings in osteoarthritis. Magn Reson Med 2003;50:1229-36.
11. Stammberger T, Eckstein F, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Determination of 3D cartilage thickness data from MR imaging: computational method and reproducibility in the living. Magn Reson Med 1999;41:529-36.
12. Hohe J, Ateshian G, Reiser M, Englmeier KH, Eckstein F. Surface size, curvature analysis, and assessment of knee joint incongruity with MRI in vivo. Magn Reson Med 2002;47:554-61.
13. Hyhlik-Durr A, Faber S, Burgkart R, Stammberger T, Maag KP, Englmeier KH, et al. Precision of tibial cartilage morphometry with a coronal water-excitation MR sequence. Eur Radiol 2000; 10:297-303.
14. Eckstein F, Heudorfer L, Faber SC, Burgkart R, Englmeier KH, Reiser M. Long-term and resegmentation precision of quantitative cartilage MR imaging (qMRI). Osteoarthritis Cartilage 2002;10: 922-8.