The MUMO (minimal under-restraining minimal over-restraining) method for the determination of native state ensembles of proteins

Journal of Biomolecular NMR

Volumn 37, Issue 2, 2007, Pages 117-135

  Richter, Barbara ^a   Gsponer, Joerg ^a   Vérnai, Péter ^a   Salvatella, Xavier ^a   Vendruscolo, Michele ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Molecular dynamics simulations; Nuclear magnetic resonance; Over restraining; Structural ensembles; Structure determination; Under restraining

Indexed keywords

AMIDE;

ACCURACY; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION COEFFICIENT; HYDROGEN BOND; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MOLECULAR DYNAMICS; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE SPECTROSCOPY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN DETERMINATION; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; SIMULATION; UBIQUITINATION;

AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; MODELS, MOLECULAR; PROTEIN CONFORMATION; PROTONS; SOFTWARE; UBIQUITIN;

EID: 33846532929     PISSN: 09252738     EISSN: 15735001     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10858-006-9117-7     Document Type: Article

References (70)

1. Barfield M (2002) Structural dependencies of interresidue scalar coupling (h3)J(NC), and donor H-1 chemical shifts in the hydrogen bonding regions of proteins. J Am Chem Soc 124:4158-4168
2. Bax A (2003) Weak alignment offers new NMR opportunities to study protein structure and dynamics. Prot Sci 12:1-16
3. Beglov D, Roux B (1994) Finite representation of an infinite bulk system: Solvent boundary potential for computer simulations. J Chem Phys 100:9050-9063
4. Best RB, Vendruscolo M (2004) Determination of protein structures consistent with NMR order parameters. J Am Chem Soc 126:8090-8091
5. Bonvin AMJJ, Boelens R, Kaptein R (1994) Time- and ensemble-averaged direct NOE restraints. J Biomol NMR 4:143-149
6. Bonvin AMJJ, Brunger AT (1995) Conformational variability of solution nuclearmagnetic-resonance structures. J Mol Biol 250:80-93
7. Bonvin AMJJ, Brünger AT (1996) Do NOE distances contain enough information to assess the relative populations of multi-conformer structures? J Biomol NMR 7:72-76
8. Brooks BR, Bruccoleri RE, Olafson BD, States DJ, Swaminathan S, Karplus M (1983) CHARMM: A program for macromolecular energy, minimization and dynamics calculations. J Comp Chem 4:187-217
9. Brünger A (1992) Free R value: A novel statistical quantity for assessing the accuracy of crystal structures. Nature 355:472-475
10. Brünger A, Adams P, Clore G, DeLano W, Gros P, Grosse-Kunstleve R, Jiang J, Kuszewski J, Nilges M, Pannu N, Read R, Rice L, Simonson T, Warren G (1998) Crystallography & NMR system: A new software suite for macromolecular structure determination. Acta Cryst D 54:905-921
11. Brünger A, Clore GM, Gronenborn A, Saffrich R, Nilges M (1993) Assessing the quality of solution nuclear magnetic resonance structures by complete cross-validation. Science 261:328-331
12. Brünger AT, Clore GM, Gronenborn AM, Karplus M (1986) Three-dimensional structure of proteins determined by molecular dynamics with interproton distance restraints: Application to crambin. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 83:3801-3805
13. Bürgi R, Pitera J, van Gunsteren WF (2001) Assessing the effect of conformational averaging on the measured values of observables. J Biomol NMR 19:305-320
14. Carlson HA (2002) Protein flexibility and drug design: How to hit a moving target. Curr Opin Cell Biol 6:447-452
15. Carlson HA, McCammon JA (2000) Accomodating protein flexibility in computational drug design. Mol Pharmacol 57:213-218
16. 5N NMR relaxation. J Magn Res 174:43-53
17. Chen J, Brooks CL, Wright PE (2004) Model-free analysis of protein dynamics: Assessment of accuracy and model selection protocols based on molecular dynamics simulation. J Biomol NMR 29:243-257
18. 3J CN couplings. J Am Chem Soc 125:8959-8966
19. Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2004) How much backbone motion in ubiquitin is required to account for dipolar coupling data measured in multiple alignment media as assessed by independent cross-validation? J Am Chem Soc 126:2923-2938
20. Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2004) Amplitudes of protein backbone dynamics and correlated motions in a small alpha/beta protein: Correspondence of dipolar coupling and heteronuclear relaxation measurements. Biochemistry 43:10678-10691
21. Clore GM, Schwieters CD (2006) Concordance of residual dipolar couplings, backbone order parameters and crystallographic B-factors for a small alpha/beta protein: A unified picture of high probability, fast atomic motions in proteins. J Mol Biol 355:879-886
22. Cordier F, Grzesiek S (1999) Direct observation of hydrogen bonds in proteins by interresidue 3hJNC' scalar couplings. J Am Chem Soc 117:5179-5197
23. Cordier F, Grzesiek S (2002) Temperature-dependence of protein hydrogen bond properties as studied by high-resolution NMR. J Mol Biol 317:739-752
24. Cornilescu G, Marquardt JL, Ottiger M, Bax A (1998) Validation of protein structure from anisotropic carbonyl chemical shifts in a dilute liquid crystalline phase. J Am Chem Soc 120:6836-6837
25. de Alba E, Tjandra N (2002) NMR dipolar couplings for the structure determination of biopolymers in solution. Prog Nucl Mag Res Spec 40:175-197
26. Fennen J, Torda AE, van Gunsteren WF (1995) Structure refinement with molecular-dynamics and a boltzmann-weighted ensemble. J Biomol NMR 6:163-170
27. Grunberg R, Leckner J, Nilges M (2004) Complementarity of structure ensembles in protein-protein binding. Science 12:2125-2136
28. Grzesiek S, Cordier F, Jaravine V, Barfield M (2004) Insights into biomolecular hydrogen bonds from hydrogen bond scalar couplings. Prog Nucl Mag Res Spec 45:275-300
29. Henry ER, Szabo A (1985) Influence of vibrational motion on solid state line shapes and NMR relaxation. J Chem Phys 82:4753-4761
30. Hess B, Scheek RM (2003) Orientation restraints in molecular dynamics simulations using time and ensemble averaging. J Magn Res 164:19-27
31. Ichiye T, Karplus M (1988) Anisotropy and anharmonicity of atomic fluctuations in proteins: Implications for x-ray analysis. Biochemistry 27:3487-3497
32. Jorgensen WJ, Chandrasekhar J, Madura JD, Impey RW, Klein ML (1983) Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys 79:926-935
33. Karplus M (1963) Vicinal proton coupling in nuclear magnetic resonance. J Am Chem Soc 85:2870-2871
34. Karplus M, Kuriyan J (2005) Molecular dynamics and protein function. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:6679-6685
35. Karplus M, McCammon JA (2002) Molecular dynamics simulations of biomolecules. Nat Struct Biol 9:646-652
36. Karplus M, Petsko G (1990) Molecular dynamics simulations in biology. Nature 347:631-639
37. Kemmink J, Scheek RM (1995) Dynamic modeling of a helical peptide in solution using NMR data - multiple conformations and multi-spin effects. J Biomol NMR 6:33-40
38. Kuriyan J, Petsko G, Levy RM, Karplus M (1986) Effect of anisotropy and anharmonicity on protein crystallographic refinement: An evaluation by molecular dynamics. J Mol Biol 190:227-254
39. Kuszewski J, Gronenborn AM, Clore GM (1999) Improving the packing and accuracy of NMR structures with a pseudopotential for the radius of gyration. J Am Chem Soc 121:2337-2338
40. 3c NMR: Relaxation techniques for the study of protein methyl group dynamics in solution. J Am Chem Soc 121:2891-2902
41. Lindorff-Larsen K, Best RB, DePristo MA, Dobson CM, Vendruscolo M (2005) Simultaneous determination of protein structure and dynamics. Nature 433:128-132
42. Lipari G, Szabo A (1982) Model-free approach to the interpretation of nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation in macromolecules. 1. Theory and range of validity. J Am Chem Soc 104:4546-4559
43. 10-35): Sequence effects. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 99:14126-14131
44. MacKerell Jr AD, Bashford D, Bellot M, Dunbrack RLJ, Evanseck JD, Field MJ, Fischer S, Gao J, Guo H, Ha S, Joseph-McCarthy D, Ha S, Kuchnir L, Kuczera K, Lau FTK, Mattos C, Michnick S, Ngo T, Nguyen DT, Prodhom B, Reiher WE, Roux B, Schlenkrich B, Smith JC, Stote RH, Straub J, Wiórkiewicz-Kuczera J, Yin D, Karplus M (1998) All-atom empirical potential for molecular modeling and dynamics studies of proteins. J Phys Chem B 102:3586-3616
45. Mezard M, Parisi G, Virasoro M (1987) Spin glass theory and beyond. Singapore, World Scientific Publishing
46. Nederveen A, Bonvin AMJJ (2005) NMR relaxation and internal dynamics of ubiquitin from a 0.2 microsecond MD simulation. J Chem Theor Comp 1:363-374
47. Neuhaus D, Williamson MP (2000) The nuclear Overhauser effect in structural and conformational analysis. New York, Wiley
48. Paci E, Karplus M (1999) Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: An analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. J Mol Biol 288:441-459
49. Palmer AG (2004) NMR characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules. Chem Rev 104:3623-3640
50. Perryman AL, Lin J, McCammon JA (2004) HIV-1 protease molecular dynamics of a wild-type and of the V82F/I84V mutant: Possible contributions to drug resistance and a potential new target site for drugs. Prot Sci 13:1108-1123
51. Rieping W, Habeck M, Nilges M (2005) Inferential structure determination. Science 309:303-306
52. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC (1977) Numerical integration of the Cartesian equations of motion if a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of n-alkanes. J Comput Phys 23:327-341
53. Schneider TR, Brünger AT, Nilges M (1999) Influence of internal dynamics on accuracy of protein NMR structures: Derivation of realistic model distance data from a long molecular dynamics trajectory. J Mol Biol 285:727-740
54. Schwieters CD, Kuszewski JJ, Clore GM (2005) Using Xplor-NIH for NMR molecular structure determination. Prog Nucl Mag Res Spec 48:47-62
55. Scott WRP, Hunenberger PH, Tironi IG, Mark AE, Billeter SR, Fennen J, Torda AE, Huber T, Kruger P, van Gunsteren WF (1999) The GROMOS biomolecular simulation program package. J Phys Chem A 103:3596-3607
56. Scott WRP, Mark AE, van Gunsteren WF (1998) On using time-averaging restraints in molecular dynamics simulation. J Biomol NMR 12:501-508
57. Spronk CAEM, Nabuurs SB, Krieger E, Vriend G, Vuister GW (2004) Validation of protein structures derived by NMR spectroscopy. Prog Nucl Mag Res Spec 45:315-337
58. Teague SJ (2003) Implications of protein flexibility for drug discovery. Nat Rev Drug Discov 2:527-541
59. Tjandra N, Feller SE, Pastor RW, Bax A (1995) Rotational diffusion anisotropy of human ubiquitin from n-15 NMR relaxation. J Am Chem Soc 117:12562-12566
60. Torda AE, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF (1989) Time averaged distance restraints in molecular dynamics simulations. Chem Phys Lett 157:289-294
61. Torda AE, Scheek RM, van Gunsteren WF (1990) Time-averaged nuclear Overhauser effect distance restraints applied to tendamistat. J Mol Biol 214:223-235
62. Vendruscolo M, Dobson CM (2005) Towards complete descriptions of the free-energy landscapes of proteins. Phil Trans R Soc A 363:433-450
63. Vendruscolo M, Paci E (2003) Protein folding: Bringing theory and experiment closer together. Curr Opin Struct Biol 13:82-87
64. Vijay-Kumar S, Bugg CE, Cook WJ (1987) Structure of ubiquitin refined at 1.8 A resolution. J Mol Biol 194:531-544
65. Wand AJ (2001) Dynamic activation of protein function: A view emerging from NMR spectroscopy. Nat. Struct Biol 8:926-931
66. Wang T, Cai S, Zuiderweg ERP (2003) Temperature dependence of anisotropic protein backbone dynamics. J Am Chem Soc 125:8639-8643
67. Wong CF, McCammon JA (2003) Protein flexibility and computer-aided drug design. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol. 43:31-45
68. Wüthrich K (1986) NMR of proteins and nucleic acids. New York, Wiley
69. Zagrovic B, van Gunsteren WF (2006) Comparing atomistic simulation data with the NMR experiment: How much can NOEs actually tell us?. Proteins 63:210-218
70. Zweckstetter M, Bax A (2000) Prediction of sterically induced alignment in a dilute liquid crystalline phase: Aid to protein structure determination by NMR. J Am Chem Soc 122:3791-3792