Protein folding: Bringing theory and experiment closer together

Current Opinion in Structural Biology

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2003, Pages 82-87

  Vendruscolo, Michele ^a   Paci, Emanuele ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

PROTEIN;

EXPERIMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN FOLDING; PROTEIN STRUCTURE; REVIEW;

EID: 0037311666     PISSN: 0959440X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0959-440X(03)00007-1     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. Bryngelson J.D., Onuchic J.N., Socci N.D., Wolynes P.G. Funnels, pathways, and the energy landscape of protein folding: a synthesis. Proteins. 21:1995;167-195.
2. Dinner A.R., Sali A., Smith L.J., Dobson C.M., Karplus M. Understanding protein folding via free-energy surfaces from theory and experiment. Trends Biochem. Sci. 25:2000;331-339 This comprehensive review presents a summary of recent experimental and theoretical advances.
3. Brooks C.L., Onuchic J.N., Wales D.J. Statistical thermodynamics. Taking a walk on a landscape. Science. 293:2001;612-613.
4. Fersht A.R., Daggett V. Protein folding and unfolding at atomic resolution. Cell. 108:2002;573-582 This review discusses progress in closing the gap between theory and experiment.
5. Vendruscolo M., Paci E., Dobson C.M., Karplus M. Three key residues form a critical contact network in a protein folding transition state. Nature. 409:2001;641-645 This paper introduces an innovative approach in which experimental data are used as restraints for the determination of the structure of the transition state for folding.
6. Choy W.Y., Mulder F.A., Crowhurst K.A., Muhandiram D.R., Millett I.S., Doniach S., Forman-Kay J.D., Kay L.E. Distribution of molecular size within an unfolded state ensemble using small-angle X-ray scattering and pulse field gradient NMR techniques. J. Mol. Biol. 316:2002;101-112 An effective approach, based on a combination of experimental and computational techniques, is used to analyse the conformational space of a protein whose native state exists in equilibrium with the unfolded state.
7. Zheng W., Doniach S. Protein structure prediction constrained by solution X-ray scattering data and structural homology identification. J. Mol. Biol. 316:2002;173-187.
8. Mirny L., Shakhnovich E. Protein folding theory: from lattice to all-atom models. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 30:2001;361-396.
9. Eaton W.A., Muñoz V., Hagen S.J., Jas G.S., Lapidus L.J., Henry E.R., Hofrichter J. Fast kinetics and mechanisms in protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biophys. Biomol. Struct. 29:2000;327-359.
10. Rumbley J., Hoang L., Mayne L., Englander S.W. An amino acid code for protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;105-112.
11. Myers J.K., Oas T.G. Mechanism of fast protein folding. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 71:2002;783-815.
12. Yi Q., Scalley-Kim M.L., Alm E.J., Baker D. NMR characterization of residual structure in the denatured state of protein L. J. Mol. Biol. 299:2000;1341-1351.
13. Kortemme T., Kelly M.J., Kay L.E., Forman-Kay J., Serrano L. Similarities between the spectrin SH3 domain denatured state and its folding transition state. J. Mol. Biol. 297:2000;1217-1229 This NMR study shows that native interactions are also present in the denatured state of a small globular protein.
14. Klein-Seetharaman J., Oikawa M., Grimshaw S.B., Wirmer J., Duchardt E., Ueda T., Imoto T., Smith L.J., Dobson C.M., Schwalbe H. Long-range interactions within a nonnative proteins. Science. 295:2002;1719-1722.
15. McParland V.J., Kalverda A.P., Homans S.W., Radford S.E. Structural properties of an amyloid precursor of β(2)-microglobulin. Nat. Struct. Biol. 9:2002;326-331.
16. Lietzow M., Jamin M., Dyson J.H., Wright P. Mapping long-range contacts in a highly unfolded protein. J. Mol. Biol. 322:2002;655-662.
17. Teilum K., Maki K., Kragelund B.B., Poulsen F.M., Roder H. Early kinetic intermediate in the folding of acyl-CoA binding protein detected by fluorescence labeling and ultrarapid mixing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;9807-9812.
18. Schuler B., Lipman E.A., Eaton W.A. Probing the free-energy surface for protein folding with single-molecule fluorescence spectroscopy. Nature. 419:2002;743-747.
19. Fisher T.E., Marszalek P.E., Fernandez J.M. Stretching single molecules into novel conformations using the atomic force microscope. Nat. Struct. Biol. 7:2000;719-724.
20. Zhuang X, Rief M: Single-molecule folding. Curr Opin Struct Biol 2003, 13:in press.
21. Marszalek P.E., Lu H., Li H., Carrion-Vazquez M., Oberhauser A.F., Schulten K., Fernandez J.M. Mechanical unfolding intermediates in titin modules. Nature. 402:1999;100-103.
22. Best R.B., Fowler S.B., Toca-Herrera J.L., Clarke J. A simple method for probing the mechanical unfolding pathway of proteins in detail. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;12143-12148 The authors present a quantitative approach for analysing atomic force microscopy results for single-molecule unfolding and an efficient way of measuring φ values for probing the transition state for mechanical unfolding.
23. Fowler S., Best R., Toca-Herrera J.L., Rutherford T., Steward A., Paci E., Karplus M., Clarke J. Mechanical unfolding of a titin Ig domain: structure of unfolding intermediate revealed by combining AFM, molecular dynamics simulations, NMR and protein engineering. J. Mol. Biol. 322:2002;841-849.
24. Choy W.Y., Forman-Kay J.D. Calculation of ensembles of structures representing the unfolded state of an SH3 domain. J. Mol. Biol. 308:2001;1011-1032.
25. Gsponer J., Caflisch A. Molecular dynamics simulations of protein folding from the transition state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;6719-6724 The transition state for folding of an SH3 domain protein is determined and validated by direct refolding using molecular dynamics simulations.
26. Paci E., Vendruscolo M., Dobson C.M., Karplus M. Determination of a transition state at atomic resolution from protein engineering data. J. Mol. Biol. 324:2002;151-163.
27. Vendruscolo M., Dokholyan N.V., Paci E., Karplus M. A small-world view of the amino acids that play a role in protein folding. Phys. Rev. E. 65:2002;061910.
28. Rohl C.A., Baker D. De novo determination of protein backbone structure from residual dipolar couplings using Rosetta. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 124:2002;2723-2729.
29. Snow C.D., Nguyen H., Pande V.S., Gruebele M. Absolute comparison of simulated and experimental protein-folding dynamics. Nature. 420:2002;102-106.
30. Cavalli A., Ferrara P., Caflisch A. Weak temperature dependence of the free energy surface and folding pathways of structured peptides. Proteins. 47:2002;305-314.
31. Ghosh A., Elber R., Scheraga H.A. An atomically detailed study of the folding pathways of protein A with the stochastic difference equation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;10394-10398.
32. Schreiber G. Kinetic studies of protein-protein interactions. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 12:2002;41-47.
33. Russell R., Zhuang X., Babcock H.P., Millett I.S., Doniach S., Chu S., Herschlag D. Exploring the folding landscape of a structured RNA. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;155-160.
34. Davis R., Dobson C.M., Vendruscolo M. Determination of the structures of distinct transition state ensembles for a β-sheet peptide with parallel folding pathways. J. Chem. Phys. 117:2002;9510-9517.
35. Smith L.J., Daura X., van Gunsteren W.F. Assessing equilibration and convergence in biomolecular simulations. Proteins. 48:2002;487-496.
36. Mayor U., Johnson C.M., Daggett V., Fersht A.R. Protein folding and unfolding in microseconds to nanoseconds by experiment and simulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;13518-13522.
37. Ferguson N., Johnson C.M., Macias M., Oschkinat H., Fersht A. Ultrafast folding of WW domains without structured aromatic clusters in the denatured state. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 98:2001;13002-13007.
38. Lu H., Isralewitz B., Krammer A., Vogel V., Schulten K. Unfolding of titin immunoglobulin domains by steered molecular dynamics simulation. Biophys. J. 75:1998;662-671.
39. Paci E., Karplus M. Forced unfolding of fibronectin type 3 modules: an analysis by biased molecular dynamics simulations. J. Mol. Biol. 288:1999;441-459.
40. Isralewitz B., Gao M., Schulten K. Steered molecular dynamics and mechanical functions of proteins. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 11:2001;224-230.
41. Zhuang X., Ha T., Kim H.D., Centner T., Labeit S., Chu S. Fluorescence quenching: a tool for single-molecule protein-folding study. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;14241-14244.
42. Fersht A.R. On the simulation of protein folding by short time scale molecular dynamics and distributed computing. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;14122-14125.
43. Shakhnovich E., Abkevich V., Ptitsyn O. Conserved residues and the mechanism of protein folding. Nature. 379:1996;96-98.
44. Kaya H., Chan H.S. Towards a consistent modeling of protein thermodynamic and kinetic cooperativity: how applicable is the transition state picture to folding and unfolding? J. Mol. Biol. 315:2002;899-909.
45. Socci N.D., Onuchic J.N., Wolynes P.G. Stretching lattice models of protein folding. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 96:1999;2031-2035.
46. Sosnick T.R., Berry R.S., Colubri A., Fernandez A. Distinguishing foldable proteins from nonfolders: when and how do they differ? Proteins. 49:2002;15-23.
47. Klimov D.K., Thirumalai D. Native topology determines force-induced unfolding pathways in globular proteins. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;7254-7259.
48. Shen T., Canino L.S., McCammon J.A. Unfolding proteins under external forces: a solvable model under the self-consistent pair contact probability approximation. Phys. Rev. Lett. 89:2002;068103.
49. Cieplak M., Hoang T.X., Robbins M.O. Thermal folding and mechanical unfolding pathways of protein secondary structures. Proteins. 49:2002;104-113.
50. Thirumalai D., Klimov D.K. Deciphering the timescales and mechanisms of protein folding using minimal off-lattice models. Curr. Opin. Struct. Biol. 9:1999;197-207.
51. Millet I.S., Townsley L.E., Chiti F., Doniach S., Plaxco K.W. Equilibrium collapse and the kinetic 'foldability' of proteins. Biochemistry. 41:2002;321-325.
52. Ozkan S.B., Bahar I., Dill K.A. Transition states and the meaning of Φ-values in protein folding kinetics. Nat. Struct. Biol. 8:2001;765-769.
53. Shimada J., Shakhnovich E.I. The ensemble folding kinetics of protein G from an all-atom Monte Carlo simulation. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 99:2002;11175-11180.
54. Zhou Y., Karplus M. Interpreting the folding kinetics of helical proteins. Nature. 401:1999;400-403.
55. Alm E., Morozov A.V., Kortemme T., Baker D. Simple physical models connect theory and experiment in protein folding kinetics. J. Mol. Biol. 322:2002;463-476.
56. Guerois R., Serrano L. The SH3-fold family: experimental evidence and prediction of variations in the folding pathways. J. Mol. Biol. 304:2000;967-982.
57. Micheletti C., Cecconi F., Flammini A., Maritan A. Crucial stages of protein folding through a solvable model: predicting target sites for enzyme-inhibiting drugs. Prot. Sci. 11:2002;1878-1887.
58. Dobson C.M. Getting out of shape. Nature. 418:2002;729-730.
59. Anderson P.W. More is different. Science. 177:1972;393-396.
60. Laughlin R.B., Pines D., Schmalian J., Stojkovic B.P., Wolynes P. The middle way. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 97:2000;32-37.