Fracture behavior of structurally compromised non-vital maxillary premolars restored using experimental fiber reinforced composite crowns

American Journal of Dentistry

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 326-332

  Fokkinga, Wietske A ^a   Kreulen, Cees M ^a   Le Bell Rönnlöf, Anna Maria ^b   Lassila, Lippo V J ^b   Vallittu, Pekka K ^b   Creugers, Nico H J ^a  

^a RADBOUD UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER   (Netherlands)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS; GLASS FIBER; RESIN;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; ARTICLE; CHEMISTRY; CHI SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; DENTAL CARE; DENTAL SURGERY; HUMAN; INJURY; MATERIALS TESTING; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PREMOLAR TOOTH; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH FRACTURE; TOOTH PULP DISEASE;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; BICUSPID; CHI-SQUARE DISTRIBUTION; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL RESTORATION FAILURE; DENTAL STRESS ANALYSIS; GLASS; HUMANS; MATERIALS TESTING; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; SHEAR STRENGTH; TOOTH FRACTURES; TOOTH, NONVITAL;

EID: 33846162256     PISSN: 08948275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Asmussen E, Peutzfeldt A, Heitmann T. Stiffness, elastic limit, and strength of newer types of endodontic posts. J Dent 1999; 27: 275-278.
2. King P, Setchell D. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990; 17: 599-609.
3. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997; 78: 5-9.
4. Dean JP, Jeansonne BG, Sarkar N. In vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber post. J Endod 1998; 24: 807-810.
5. Martinez-Insua A, Da Silva L, Rilo B, Santana U. Comparison of the fracture resistances of pulpless teeth restored with a cast post and core or carbon-fiber post with a composite core. J Prosthet Dent 1998; 80: 527-532.
6. Cormier CJ, Burns DR, Moon P. In vitro comparison of the fracture resistance and failure mode of fiber, ceramic, and conventional post systems at various stages of restoration. J Prosthodont 2001; 10: 26-36.
7. Akkayan B, Gülmez T. Resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth restored with different post systems. J Prosthet Dent 2002; 87: 431-437.
8. Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM, Vallittu PK, Creugers NHJ. A structured analysis of in vitro failure loads and failure modes of fiber, metal and ceramic post-and-core systems. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 476-482.
9. Sirimai S, Riss DN, Morgano SM. An in vitro study of the fracture resistance and the incidence of vertical root fracture of pulpless teeth restored with six post-and-core-systems. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 262-269.
10. Rosentritt M, Fürer C, Behr M, Lang R, Handel G. Comparison of in vitro fracture strength of metallic and tooth-coloured posts and cores. J Oral Rehabil 2000; 27: 595-601.
11. Eskitascioglu G, Belli S, Kalkan M. Evaluation of two post core systems using two different methods (fracture strength test and a finite elemental stress analysis). J Endod 2002; 28: 629-633.
12. Lassila LVJ, Tanner J, Le Bell A-M, Narva K, Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of fiber reinforced root canal posts. Dent Mat 2004; 20: 29-36.
13. Le Bell A-M, Tanner J, Lassila LVJ, Kangasniemi I, Vallittu PK. Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal. Int J Prosthodont 2003; 16: 403-408.
14. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumol 1985; 1: 108-111.
15. Fuss Z, Lustig J, Katz A, Tamse A. An evaluation of endodontically treated vertical root fractured teeth: Impact of operative procedures. J Endod 2001; 27: 46-48.
16. Yang HS, Lang LA, Molina A, Felton DA. The effects of dowel design and load direction on dowel-and-core restorations. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 85: 558-567.
17. Roeters JJ. Extended indications for directly bonded composite restorations: A clinician's view. J Adhes Dent 2001; 3: 81-87.
18. Emilson CG, Lindquist B. The clinical performance of composite resin crowns after 5-8 years. J Dent Res 2004; 83 (Abstr 542).
19. Krejci I, Mueller E, Lutz F. Effects of thermocycling and occlusal force on adhesive composite crowns. J Dent Res 1994; 73: 1228-1232.
20. Mannocci F, Bertelli E, Sherrif M, Watson TF, Ford TRP. Three-year clinical comparison of survival of endodontically treated teeth restored with either full cast coverage or with direct composite restoration. J Prosthet Dent 2002 ;88: 297-301.
21. Creugers NHJ, Mentink AGB, Fokkinga WA, Kreulen CM. 5-year follow-up of a prospective clinical study on various types of core restorations. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 34-39.
22. Creugers NHJ, Kreulen CM, Fokkinga WA, Mentink AGB. A 5-year prospective clinical study on core restorations without covering crowns. Int J Prosthodont 2005; 18: 40-41.
23. Fokkinga WA, Le Bell A-M, Kreulen CM, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK, Creugers NHJ. In vitro fracture resistance of direct resin composite crowns on endodontically treated teeth. Int Endod J 2005:38:230-237.
24. Brunton PA, Cattell P, Burke FJ, Wilson NHF. Fracture resistance of teeth restored with onlays of three contemporary tooth-colored resin-bonded restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 82: 167-171.
25. Isaac DH. Engineering aspects of fibre reinforced composites. In: Vallittu PK. The first symposium on fibre reinforced plastics in dentistry. Turku: University of Turku, Finland, 1999.
26. Vallittu PK. Flexural properties of acrylic polymers reinforced with unidirectional and woven glass fibers. J Prosthet Dent 1999; 81: 318-26.
27. Fennis WMM, Tezvergil A, Kuijs RH, Lassila LVJ, Kreulen CM, Creugers NHJ, Vallittu PK. In vitro fracture resistance of fibre reinforced cusp-replacing composite restorations. Dent Mat 2005; 21: 565-572.
28. Vallittu PK. Experience of the use of glass fibres with multiphase acrylic resin systems. In: Vallittu PK. The first symposium on fibre reinforced plastics in dentistry. Turku: University of Turku, Finland.
29. Torbjörner A, Fransson B. A literature review on the prosthetic treatment of structurally compromised teeth. Int J Prosthodont 2004; 17: 369-367.
30. Reid LC, Kazemi RB, Meiers JC. Effect of fatigue testing on core integrity and post microleakage of teeth restored with different post systems. J Endod 2003; 29: 125-131.
31. Bolhuis PB, de Gee AJ, Feilzer AJ, Davidson CL. Fracture strength of different core build-up designs. Am J Dent 2001; 14 286-290.
32. Klocke A, Kahl-Nieke B. Influence of crosshead speed in orthodontic bond strength testing. Dent Mat 2005; 21: 139-144.
33. Hara AT, Pimnta LAF, Rodrigues Jr. Influence of cross-head speed on resin-dentin shear bond strength. Dent Mat 2001; 17: 165-169.
34. Drummond JL, Toepke TRS, King TJ. Thermal and cyclic loading of endodontic posts. Eur J Oral Sci 1999; 107: 220-224.
35. Yang HS, Lang LA, Guckes AD, Felton DA. The effect of thermal change on various dowel-and-core restorative materials. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 74-80.
36. Purton DG, Chandler N, Qualtrough AJE. Effect of thermocycling on the retention of glass-fiber root canal posts. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 366-369.
37. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984; 52: 28-35.
38. De Cleen. The relationship between the root canal filling and post space preparation. Int Endod J 1993; 26: 53-58.
39. Nissan J, Dmitry Y, Assif D. The use of reinforced composite resin cement as compensation for reduced post length. J Prosthet Dent 2001; 86: 304-308.
40. Qualthrough AJE, Chandler NP, Purton DG. A comparison of the retention of tooth-colored posts. Quintessence Int 2003; 34: 199-201.
41. Bolhuis P, de Gee A, Feilzer A. Influence of fatigue loading on four post-and-core systems in maxillary premolars. Quintessence Int 2004; 35: 657-667.
42. Krejci I, Duc O, Dietschi D, de Campos E. Marginal adaptation, retention and fracture resistance of adhesive composite restorations on devital teeth with and without posts. Oper Dent 2003; 28: 127-135.
43. Keski-Nikkola MS, Lassila LVJ, Vallittu PK. An in vitro investigation of bond strength veneering composite resin to glass fibre veil reinforced composite. Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent 2004; 12: 80-86.