Depth of light-initiated polymerization of glass fiber-reinforced composite in a simulated root canal

International Journal of Prosthodontics

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2003, Pages 403-408

  Le Bell, Anna Maria ^a   Tanner, Johanna ^a   Lassila, Lippo V J ^a   Kangasniemi, Ilkka ^b   Vallittu, Pekka K ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TURKU   (Finland)

^b Stick Tech Ltd   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

GLASS FIBER; METHACRYLIC ACID; MONOMER; POLYMER; RESIN; ROOT CANAL FILLING MATERIAL;

ARTICLE; COMPOSITE MATERIAL; ENDODONTICS; HARDNESS; INFRARED SPECTROMETRY; LIGHT EXPOSURE; PHOTOREACTIVATION; POLYMERIZATION; SIMULATION; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH ROOT CANAL;

BISPHENOL A-GLYCIDYL METHACRYLATE; COMPOSITE RESINS; DENTAL PULP CAVITY; GLASS; HARDNESS; HUMANS; LIGHT; MATERIALS TESTING; METHACRYLATES; POLYETHYLENE GLYCOLS; POLYMERS; POLYMETHACRYLIC ACIDS; POLYMETHYL METHACRYLATE; SPECTROSCOPY, FOURIER TRANSFORM INFRARED; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TIME FACTORS;

EID: 0141851112     PISSN: 08932174     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Eckerbom M, Magnusson T. Restoring endodontically treated teeth: A survey of current opinions among board-certified prosthodontists and general dental practitioners in Sweden. Int J Prosthodont 2001;14:245-259.
2. Heydecke G, Butz F, Strub JR. Fracture strength and survival rate of endodontically treated maxillary incisors with approximal cavities after restoration with different post and core systems: An in-vitro study. J Dent 2001;29:427-433.
3. Assif D, Bitenski A, Pilo R, Oren E. Effect of post design on resistance to fracture of endodontically treated teeth with complete crowns. J Prosthet Dent 1993;69:36-40.
4. Trope M, Maltz DO, Tronstad L. Resistance to fracture of restored endodontically treated teeth. Endod Dent Traumatol 1985;1:108-111.
5. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Intracoronal reinforcement and coronal coverage: A study of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1984;51:780-784.
6. Healey HJ. Restoration of treated pulpless tooth. In: Endodontics. St Louis: Mosby, 1960:267-291.
7. Silverstein WH. The reinforcement of weakened pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1964;14:372-381.
8. Baraban DJ. The restoration of pulpless teeth. Dent Clin North Am 1967;Nov:633-653.
9. Shillingburg HT Jr, Fisher DW, Dewhirst RB. Restoration of endodontically treated posterior teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1970;24:401-409.
10. Hunter AJ, Feiglin B, Williams JF. Effects of post placement on endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1989;62:166-172.
11. Sorensen JA, Martinoff JT. Clinically significant factors in dowel design. J Prosthet Dent 1984;52:28-35.
12. Torbjörner A, Karlsson S, Ödman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.
13. Tjan AH, Whang SB. Resistance to root fracture of dowel channels with various thicknesses of buccal dentin walls. J Prosthet Dent 1985;53:496-500.
14. Standlee JP, Caputo AA, Hanson EC. Retention of endodontic dowels: Effects of cement, dowel length, diameter, and design. J Prosthet Dent 1978;39:400-405.
15. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:599-609.
16. Duret B, Reynaud M, Duret F. Un nouveau concept de reconstitution corono-radiculaire: Le Composipost (1). Chir Dent Fr 1990;60:131-141.
17. Rovatti L, Mason PN, Dallari A. Nuove ricerche sui perni endocanalari in fibra di Carbonio. Minerva Stomatol 1994;43:557-563.
18. Morgano SM, Brackett SE. Foundation restorations in fixed prosthodontics: Current knowledge and future needs. J Prosthet Dent 1999;82:643-657.
19. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root canal posts. Quintessence Int 1996;27:93-97.
20. Isidor F, Ödman P, Brondum K. Intermittent loading of teeth restored using prefabricated carbon fiber posts. Int J Prosthodont 1996;9:131-136.
21. Sidoli GE, King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a carbon fiber-based post and core system. J Prosthet Dent 1997;78:5-9.
22. Fredriksson M, Astbäck J, Pamenius M, Arvidson K. A retrospective study of 236 patients with teeth restored by carbon fiber-reinforced epoxy resin posts. J Prosthet Dent 1998;80:151-157.
23. Kallio TT, Lastumaki TM, Vallittu PK. Bonding of restorative and veneering composite resin to some polymeric composites. Dent Mater 2001;17:80-86.
24. McKoy BE, Kang Q, An YH. Indentation testing of bone. In: An YH, Draughn RA (eds). Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2000:233-239.
25. Huja SS, Katona TR, Roberts WE. Microhardness testing of bone. In: An YH, Draughn RA (eds). Mechanical Testing of Bone and the Bone-Implant Interface. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2000:247-255.
26. Anusavice KJ. Restorative resins. In: Philips' Science of Dental Materials. Philadelphia: Saunders, 1996:282-284.
27. Yoshida K, Greener EH. Effects of two amine reducing agents on the degree of conversion and physical properties of an unfilled light-cured resin. Dent Mater 1993;9:246-251.
28. Peutzfeldt A. Resin composites in dentistry: The monomer systems. Eur J Oral Sci 1997;105:97-116.
29. Vallittu PK. Oxygen inhibition of autopolymerization of polymethylmethacrylate-glass fibre composite. J Mater Sci Mater Med 1997;8:489-492.
30. Rueggeberg FA, Margeson DH. The effect of oxygen inhibition on an unfilled/filled composite system. J Dent Res 1990;69:1652-1658.
31. Lassila LV, Nohrstrom T, Vallittu PK. The influence of short-term water storage on the flexural properties of unidirectional glass fiber-reinforced composites. Biomaterials 2002;23:2221-2229.