The effect of thermal change on various dowel-and-core restorative materials

Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry

Volumn 86, Issue 1, 2001, Pages 74-80

  Yang, Hong So ^a   Lang, Lisa A ^b,d   Guckes, Albert D ^c   Felton, David A ^c  

^a Chonnam National University   (South Korea)

^b UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^d School of Dentistry   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALLOY; BIOMEDICAL AND DENTAL MATERIALS; CARBON; CARBON FIBER; DENTAL ALLOY; GOLD ALLOY; RESIN; STAINLESS STEEL; ZINC PHOSPHATE;

ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; BODY TEMPERATURE; CHEMISTRY; COLD; DENTIN; ENDODONTICS; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; HEAT; HUMAN; INCISOR; PHYSIOLOGY; STATISTICS; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; TOOTH CROWN; TOOTH PROSTHESIS;

BODY TEMPERATURE; CARBON; COLD; COMPOSITE RESINS; CROWNS; DENTAL ALLOYS; DENTAL AMALGAM; DENTAL MATERIALS; DENTAL PROSTHESIS DESIGN; DENTIN; FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS; GOLD ALLOYS; HEAT; HUMANS; INCISOR; METAL CERAMIC ALLOYS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POST AND CORE TECHNIQUE; ROOT CANAL THERAPY; STAINLESS STEEL; STATISTICS; TEMPERATURE; THERMODYNAMICS; ZINC PHOSPHATE CEMENT;

EID: 0035403823     PISSN: 00223913     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1067/mpr.2001.115503     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Ring ME. Dentistry: an illustrated history. New York (NY): Abradale-Mosby; 1992. p. 160-79.
2. Shillingburg HT, Hobo S, Whitsett LD, Jacobi R, Brackett SE. Fundamentals of fixed prosthodontics. 3rd ed. Chicago (IL): Quintessence; 1997. p. 194-209.
3. King PA, Setchell DJ. An in vitro evaluation of a prototype CFRC prefabricated post developed for the restoration of pulpless teeth. J Oral Rehabil 1990;17:599-609.
4. Purton DG, Payne JA. Comparison of carbon fiber and stainless steel root posts. Quintessence Int 1996;27:93-7.
5. McDonald AV, King PA, Setcheil DJ. In vitro study to compare impact fracture resistance of intact root-treated teeth, Int EndodJ 1990;23:304-12.
6. Smith CT, Schuman NJ, Wasson W. Biomechanical criteria for evaluating prefabricated post-and-core systems: a guide for the restorative dentist. Quintessence Int 1998;29:305-12.
7. Cohen BI, Pagnillo MK, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Four different core materials measured for fracture strength in combination with five different designs of endodontic posts. J Prosthet Dent 1996;76:487-95.
8. Oilo G. The extent of slits at the interfaces between luting cements and enamel, dentin and alloy. Acta Odontol Scand 1978;36:257-61.
9. Palmer DS, Barco MT, Billy EJ. Temperature extremes produced orally by hot and cold liquids. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:325-7.
10. Craig RG. Restorative dental materials. 10th ed. St. Louis (MO): Mosby-Year Book; 1997. p. 38-45.
11. Ho MH, Lee SY, Chen HH, Lee MC. Three-dimensional finite element analysis of the effects of posts on stress distribution in dentin. J Prosthet Dent 1994;72:367-72.
12. Ko CC, Chu CS, Chung KH, Lee MC. Effects of posts on dentin stress distribution in pulpless teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1992;68:421-7.
13. Davy DT, Dilley GL, Krejci RF. Determination of stress patterns in root-filled teeth incorporating various dowel designs. J Dent Res 1981;60:1301-10.
14. O'Brien WJ. Dental materials: properties and selection. 2nd ed. Chicago (IL): Quintessence; 1997. p. 335-98.
15. Farah JW, Craig RG, Meroueh KA. Finite element analysis of three- and four-unit bridges. J Oral Rehabil 1989;16:603-11.
16. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Syverud M, Hensten-Petterson A. Carbon fiber reinforced root canal post. Mechanical and cytotoxic properties. Eur J Oral Sci 1996;104:605-11.