Adaptive evolution of Hox-gene homeodomains after cluster duplications

BMC Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 6, Issue , 2006, Pages

  Lynch, Vincent J ^a   Roth, Jutta J ^a,b,c   Wagner, Günter P ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SALZBURG   (Austria)

^c NATIONAL INSTITUTE FOR MEDICAL RESEARCH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

HOMEODOMAIN PROTEIN; HOX PROTEIN;

ARTICLE; GENE CLUSTER; GENE DUPLICATION; GENE FUNCTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; HOX GENE; HUMAN; MOLECULAR EVOLUTION; NONHUMAN; PARALOGY; PROTEIN PROTEIN INTERACTION; ADAPTATION; ANIMAL; BAYES THEOREM; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; GENETICS; HOMEOBOX; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PROTEIN TERTIARY STRUCTURE; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT; STATISTICAL MODEL;

VERTEBRATA;

ADAPTATION, BIOLOGICAL; ANIMALS; BAYES THEOREM; GENE DUPLICATION; GENES, HOMEOBOX; HOMEODOMAIN PROTEINS; HUMANS; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; MULTIGENE FAMILY; PHYLOGENY; PROTEIN STRUCTURE, TERTIARY; SEQUENCE ALIGNMENT;

EID: 33751005278     PISSN: 14712148     EISSN: 14712148     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-6-86     Document Type: Article

References (54)

1. Duboule D: Guidebook to the Homeobox Genese. Oxford, Oxford University Press; 1994.
2. Kobayashi A Behringer, R. R.: Developmental Genetics of the Female Reproductive Tract in Mammals. Nature Reviews Genetics 2003:1225-1237.
3. Powers TP Amemiya, C.T.: Evidence for a Hox14 paralog group in vertebrates. Current Biology 2004, 14:R183-R184.
4. Schughart K KC Ruddle FH.: Mammalian homeobox-containing genes: genome organization, structure, expression and evolution. British Journal of Cancer 1988, 9:9-13.
5. Wagner GP Amemiya, C.T., Ruddle, F.: Hox Cluster Duplications and the Opportunity for Evolutionary Novelties. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2003, 100:14603-14606.
6. Amores A, Force A, Yan YL, Joly L, Amemiya C, Fritz A, Ho RK, Langeland J, Prince V, Wang YL, Westerfield M, Ekker M, Postlethwait JH: Zebrafish hox Clusters and Vertebrate Genome Evolution. Science 1998, 282:1711-1714.
7. Amores A, Suzuki T, Yan YL, Pomeroy J, Singer A, Amemiya C, Postlethwait JH: Developmental Roles of Pufferfish Hox Clusters and Genome Evolution in Ray-Fin Fish. Genome Res 2004, 14:1-10.
8. Stadler PF Fried, C., Prohaska, S.J., Bailey, W.J., Misof, B.Y., Ruddle, F.H., Wagner, G.P.: Evidence for independent Hox gene duplications in the hagfish lineage: a PCR-based gene inventory of Eptatretus stoutii. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 2004, 32:686-694.
9. Fried C Prohaska, S.J., Stadler, P.F.: Independent Hox-cluster duplications in lampreys. J Exp Zoolog B Mol Dev Evol 2003, 299:18-24.
10. Kimura M: The neutral theory of molecular evolution. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press; 1983.
11. Force A, Lynch M, Pickett FB, Amores A, Yan Y, Postlethwait J: Preservation of Duplicate Genes by Complementary, Degenerative Mutations. Genetics 1999, 151:1531-1545.
12. Goodman M Moorse, G.W., Matsuda, G.: Darwinian evolution in the genealogy of haemoglobin. Nature 1975, 253:603-608.
13. Dykhuizen D, Hartl DL: SELECTIVE NEUTRALITY OF 6PGD ALLOZYMES IN E. COLI AND THE EFFECTS OF GENETIC BACKGROUND. Genetics 1980, 96:801-817.
14. Hughes AL: Adaptive Evolution of Genes and Genomes. New York, Oxford University Press; 2000.
15. He X Zhang, J.: Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics 2005, 169:1157-1164.
16. Francino MP: An adaptive radiation model for the origin of new gene functions. Nature Genetics 2005, 37:573-577.
17. Fares MA, Bezemer D, Moya A, Marin I: Selection on Coding Regions Determined Hox7 Genes Evolution. Mol Biol Evol 2003, 20:2104-2112.
18. Van de Peer Y Taylor, J.S., Braasch, I., Meyer, A.: The ghost of selection past: Rates of evolution and functional divergence of anciently duplicated genes. Journal of Molecular Evolution 2001, 53:636-446.
19. Lynch VJ Roth, J.J., Takahashi, K., Dunn, C., Nonaka, D.F., Stopper, G., and Wagner, G.P.: Adaptive Evolution of HoxA-11 and HoxA-13 at the Origin of the Uterus in Mammals. Proceedings of the Royal Soceity of London B 2004, 271:2201-2207.
20. Crow K Stadler, P., Lynch, V.J., Amemiya, C., Wagner, G.P.: The Fish Specific Hox Cluster Duplication is Coincident With the Origin of Teleosts. Molecular Biology and Evolution in press.
21. Holland PW Garcia-Fernandez J.: Hox genes and chordate evolution. Developmental Biology 1996, 173:382-395.
22. Wagner GP Amemiya, C., Ruddle, F.: Hox clusters duplications and the opportunity for evolutionary novelties. Proceedings of the National Acadmey of Sciences, USA 2003, 100:14603-14606.
23. Malaga-Trillo EAM: Genome duplications and accelerated evolution of Hox genes and cluster architecture in teleost fishes. American Zoologist 2001, 41:676-686.
24. Greer JM Puetz, J., Thomas, K.R., Capecchi, M.R.: Maintenance of functional equivalence during paralogous Hox gene evolution. Nature 2000, 403:661-665.
25. McGinnis N Kuziora, M.A., McGinnis, W.: Human Hox-4.2 and Drosophila deformed encode similar regulatory specificities in Drosophila embryos and marvae. Cell 1990:969-976.
26. Malicki J Clianetti, L.C., Paschle, C., McGinnis, W.: A human Hox4B regulatory selemtns provides head-specific expression in Drosophila embryos. Nature 1992, 358:345-347.
27. Awgulewitsch A Jacobs, D.: Deformed autoregulatory element from Drosophila functions in a conserved manner in transgenic mice. Nature 1992:341-334.
28. Zakany J Gerard, M., Favier, B., Potter, S.S., Duboule, D.: Functional equivalence and rescue among group 11 Hox gene products in vertebral patterning. Developmental Biology 1996, 176:325-328.
29. Zhao JJ Lazzarini, R.A., Pick, L.: The mouse Hox-1.3 is functionally equivalent to the Drosophila sex combs reduced gene. Genes and Development 1993, 7:343-354.
30. Grenier JK Carroll, S.B.: Functional evolution of the Ultrabithorax protein. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 2000, 97:704-709.
31. Zhao Y Potter, S.S.: Functional comparison of the Hoxa 4, Hoxa 10, and Hoxa 11 homeoboxes. Developmental Biology 2002, 224:21-36.
32. Zhao Y Potter, S.S.: Functional specificity of the Hoxa13 homeobox. Development 2001, 128:3197-3207.
33. Sharkey M Graba, Y., Scott, M.P: Hox genes in evolution: protein surfaces and paralog groups. Trends in Genetics 1997, 13:145-151.
34. Gu X: Functional divergence in protein (family) sequence evolution. Genetica 2003, 118:133-141.
35. Gu X: A simple statistical method for estimating type-II (cluster-specific) functional divergence of protein sequences. molecular biology and evolution 2006, 23:1937-1945.
36. Gu X Vander Velden, K.: DIVERGE: phylogeny based analysis for functional-structural divergence of a protein family. Bioinformatics 2002, 18:500-501.
37. Gu X: Statistical methods for testing functional divergence after gene duplication. molecular biology and evolution 1999, 16:1664-1674.
38. Anisimova M Bielawski, J.P., Yang, Z.: Accuracy and power of the likelihood ratio test in detecting adaptive molecular evolution. Molecular biology and evolution 2001, 18:1585-1592.
39. Yang Z: Likelihood ratio tests for detecting positive selection and application to primate lysozyme evolution. Mol Biol Evol 1998, 15:568-573.
40. Yang Z: PAML. a program package for phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. CABIOS 1997, 13:555-556.
41. Creevey CJ McInerney, J.O.: An algorithm for detecting directional and non-directional positive selection, neutrality and negative selection in protein coding DNA sequences. Genetica 2002, 300:43-51.
42. Templeton A: Genetic systems and evolutionary rates. In Rates of Evolutionq Edited by: MF CKSWD. London, Allen & Unwin; 1987:218-234.
43. McDonald JH Kreitman, M.: Adaptive protein evolution at the Adh locus in Drosophila. Nature 1991, 351:652-654.
44. Yang Z Nielsen, R.: Codon-substitution models for detecting molecular adaptation at individual sites along specific lineages. molecular biology and evolution 2002, 19:908-917.
45. Yang Z, Wong WSW, Nielsen R: Bayes Empirical Bayes Inference of Amino Acid Sites Under Positive Selection. Mol Biol Evol 2005, 22:1107-1118.
46. Crooks GE Hon, G., Chandonia, J.M., Brenner, S.E.,: WebLogo: A sequence logo generator. Genome Research 2004, 14:1188-1190.
47. Schneider TDS R.M.: Sequence Logos: A new way to display consensus sequences. Nucleic Acids Research 1990, 18:6097.
48. Shen W, Chrobak D, Krishnan K, Lawrence HJ, Largman C: HOXB6 Protein Is Bound to CREB-binding Protein and Represses Globin Expression in a DNA Binding-dependent, PBX Interaction-independent Process. J Biol Chem 2004, 279:39895-39904.
49. Zappavigna V Falciola, L., Helmer-Citterich, M., Mavilo, F., Bianchi, M.E.: HMG1 interacts with HOX proteins and enhances thier DNA binding and transcriptional activation. EMBO Journal 1996, 15:4981-4991.
50. Kataoka K Yoshitomo-Nakagawa, K., Shioda, S., Nishizawa, M.: A set of Hox proteins interact with the Maf oncoprotein to inhibit its DNA binding, transactivation, and transforming activities. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2001, 276:819-826.
51. Luo L Yang, X., Takihara, Y., Knoetgen, H., Kessel, M.: The cell-cycle regulator geminin inhibits hox function through direct and polycomb-mediated interactions. Nature 2004, 427:749-753.
52. Suzuki M Ueno. N., Kuroiwa, A.: Hox proteins functionally cooperate with the GC box-binding protein system through distinct domains. Journal of Biological Chemistry 2003, 278:30148-30156.
53. Maizel A Bensaude, O., Prochiantz, A., Joliot, A.: A short region of its homeodomain is necessary for engrailed nuclear export. Development 1999, 126:3183-3190.
54. Roth JJ Breitenback, M., Wagner, G.P.: Multiple functions contribute to the evolutionary conservation of the homeodomain of Hoxa-11. Journal of Experimental Zoology part B: Molecular and Developmental Evolution in press.