Actuation methods for applications in MR environments

Concepts in Magnetic Resonance Part B: Magnetic Resonance Engineering

Volumn 29, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 191-209

  Gassert, Roger ^a   Yamamoto, Akio ^b   Chapuis, Dominique ^a   Dovat, Ludovic ^c   Bleuler, Hannes ^a   Burdet, Etienne ^d  

^a EPFL   (Switzerland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TOKYO   (Japan)

^c NATIONAL UNIVERSITY OF SINGAPORE   (Singapore)

^d IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Actuator; Brake; Electroactive polymers; Electromagnetic; Electrorheological fluid; Electrostatic; Functional MRI (fMRI); Hydrostatic; Lorentz force; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Mechanical transmission; MR compatible robot; Piezoelectric; Ultrasonic

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750849204     PISSN: 15525031     EISSN: 1552504X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20070     Document Type: Article

References (66)

1. Burdet E, Osu R, Franklin D, Milner T, Kawato M. 2001. The central nervous system stabilizes unstable dynamics by learning optimal impedance. Nature 414:446-449.
2. Graham S, Staines W, Nelson A, Plewes D, McIlroy W. 2001. New devices to deliver somatosensory stimuli during functional MRI. Magn Reson Med 46:436-442.
3. Golaszewski S, Siedentopf C, Baldauf E, Koppelstaetter F, Eisner W, Unterrainer J, et al. 2002. Functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human sensorimotor cortex using a novel vibrotactile stimulator. Neuroimage 17:421-430.
4. Briggs R, Dy-Liacco I, Malcolm P, Lee H, Peck K, Gopinath K, et al. 2004. A pneumatic vibrotactile stimulation device for fMRI. J Magn Reson Med 51:640-643.
5. Zappe A, Maucher T, Meier K, Scheiber C. 2004. Evaluation of a pneumatically driven tactile stimulator device for vision substitution during fMRI studies. J Magn Reson Med 51(4):828-834.
6. Gassert R, Vanello N, Chapuis D, Hartwig V, Scilingo E, Bicchi A, et al. 2006. Active mechatronic interface for haptic perception studies with functional magnetic resonance imaging: Compatibility and design criteria. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 3832-3837.
7. Bishop J, Poole G, Leitch M, Plewes D. 1998. Magnetic resonance imaging of shear wave propagation in excised tissue. J Magn Reson Imaging 8:1257-1265.
8. Bishop J, Samani A, Sciarretta J, Plewes D. 2000. Two-dimensional MR elastography with linear inversion reconstruction: methodology and noise analysis. J Phys Med Biol 45:2081-2091.
9. Uffmann K, Abicht C, Grote W, Quick H, Ladd M. 2002. Design of an MR-compatible piezoelectric actuator for MR elastography. Concepts Magn Reson 15:239-254.
10. Marti G, Rouiller P, Grange S, Baur C. 2003. Biopsy navigator: A smart haptic interface for interventional radiological gestures. In Computer Assisted Radiology and Surgery (CARS).
11. Masamune K, Kobayashi E, Masutani Y, Suzuki M, Dohi T, Iseki H, et al. 1995. Development of an MRI-compatible needle insertion manipulator for stereotactic neurosurgery. J Image Guid Surg 1(4):242-248.
12. Chinzei K, Hata N, Jolesz F, Kikinis R. 2000. Surgical assist robot for the active navigation in the intraoperative MRI: Hardware design issues. In Proc IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). p 727-732.
13. Larson B, Erdman A, Tsekos N, Yacoug E, Tsekos P, Koutlas I. 2004. Design of an MRI-compatible robotic stereotactic device for minimally invasive interventions in the breast. J Biomech Eng 126(4):458-465.
14. Harada K, Tsubouchi K, Fujie M, Chiba T. 2005. Micro manipulators for intrauterine fetal surgery in an open MRI. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 504-509.
15. Hata N, Hashimoto R, Tokuda J. 2005. Needle guiding robot for MR-guided microwave thermotherapy of liver tumor using motorized remote-center-of-motion constraint. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 1664-1668.
16. Gassert R, Moser R, Burdet E, Bleuler H. 2006. MRI/fMRI-compatible robotic system with force feedback for interaction with human motion. IEEE/ASME Transactions on Mechatronics 11(2):216-224.
17. Riener R, Villgrattner T, Kleiser R, Nef T, Kollias S. 2005. fMRI-compatible electromagnetic haptic interface. Proc 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC).
18. Gassert R, Dovat L, Lambercy O, Ruffieux Y, Chapuis D, Ganesh G, et al. 2006. A 2-DOF fMRI compatible haptic interface to interact with arm movements. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 3825-3831.
19. Burdet E, Gassert R, Gowrishankar G, Chapuis D, Bleuler H. 2006. fMRI compatible haptic interfaces to investigate human motor control. In Ang M, Khatib O, editors. Springer tracts in advanced robotics, vol. 21. Berlin: Springer. p 25-34.
20. Tada M, Sasaki S, Ogasawara T. 2002. Development of an optical 2-axis force sensor usable in MRI environments. In Proc IEEE Sensors, vol. 2, no. 67. p 984-989.
21. Takahashi N, Tada M, Ueda J, Matsumoto Y, Ogasawara T. 2003. An optical 6-axis force sensor for brain function analysis using fMRI. In Proc IEEE Sensors. p 253-258.
22. Chapuis D, Gassert R, Sache L, Burdet E, Bleuler H. 2004. Design of a simple MRI/fMRI compatible force/torque sensor. In Proc IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), vol. 3. p 2593-2599.
23. Tada M, Kanade K. 2004. An MR-compatible optical force sensor for human function modeling. In Proc International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Interventions (MICCAI). p 129-136.
24. Klarhöfer M, Haelg M, Gassert R, Haller S, Scheffler K. 2005. MR-compatible optical tracking device with active markers. In Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. p 2161.
25. Tada M, Kanade T. 2005. Design of an MR-compatible three-axis force sensor. In Proc IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). p 3505-3510.
26. Food and Drug Administration. 1997. A primer on medical device interactions with magnetic resonance imaging systems. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Available at: http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/primerf6.html
27. Chinzei K, Kikinis R, Jolesz A. 1999. MR compatibility of mechatronic devices: Design criteria. Proc Second International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-assisted Interventions (MICCAI). p 1020-1030.
28. Kanal E, Borgstede P, Barkovich A, Bell C, Bradley W, Felmlee J, et al. 2003. ACR blue ribbon panel response to the AJR commentary by shellock and crues on the ACR white paper on MR safety. AJR Am J Roentgenol 180:31-35.
29. Yamamoto A, Ichiyanagi K, Higuchi T, Imamizu H, Gassert R, Ingold M, et al. 2005. Evaluation of MR-compatibility of electrostatic linear motor. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 3658-3663.
30. Dovat L, Gassert R, Chapuis D, Ganesh G, Burdet E, Bleuler H. 2005. A haptic interface based on potential mechanical energy to investigate human motor control using fMRI. In Proc 27th Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (EMBC). p 5021-5024.
31. Hartwig V, Vanello N, Gassert R, Chapuis D, Santarelli M, Positano V, et al. 2004. A compatibility test for tactile displays designed for fMRI studies. In Proc EuroHaptics 2004. p 456-458.
32. Schenck J. 1996. The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds. Med Phys 23(6):815-850.
33. Chapuis D, Gassert R, Ganesh G, Burdet E, Bleuler H. 2006. Investigation of a cable transmission for the actuation of MR compatible haptic interfaces. In Proc First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).
34. Oura M, Kobayashi Y, Okamoto J, Fujie M. 2006. Development of MRI compatible versatile manipulator for minimally invasive surgery. In Proc First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).
35. Koseki Y, Koyachi N, Arai T, Chinzei K. 2003. Remote actuation mechanism for MR-compatible manipulator using leverage and parallelogram. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 652-657.
36. Krieger A, Susil R, Fichtinger G, Atalar E, Whitcomb L. 2004. Design of a novel MRI compatible manipulator for image guided prostate intervention. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 377-382.
37. Stippich C, Freitag P, Kassubek J, Soros K, Kamada P, Kober H, Scheffler K, et al. 1998. Motor, somatosensory and auditory cortex localization by fMRI and MEG. Neuroreport 9(9):1953-1957.
38. Golaszewski S, Zschiegner F, Siedentopf C, Unterrainer J, Sweeney R, Eisner W, et al. 2002. A new pneumatic vibrator for functional magnetic resonance imaging of the human sensorimotor cortex. J Neurosci Lett 324(2):125-128.
39. Diedrichsen J, Hashambhoy Y, Rane T, Shadmehr R. 2005. Neural correlates of reach errors. J Neurosci 25(43):9919-9931.
40. Bosgiraud T, Thiran J, Bleuler H, Popowski Y. 2005. An MR compatible delta arm for brachytherapy applied to prostate cancer treatment. In Bioengineering Day Conference of the EPFL Biomedical Engineering Society.
41. Suzumori K, Hashimoto T, Uzuka K, Enomoto I. 2002. Pneumatic direct-drive stepping motor for robots. In Proc IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS). p 2301-2036.
42. Taillant E, Avila-Vilchis J, Allegrini C, Bricault I, Cinquin P. 2004. CT and MR compatible light puncture robot: Architectural design and first experiments. In Proc International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI), vol. 3217. p 145-152.
43. Stoianovici D. 2005. Multi-imager compatible actuation principles in surgical robotics. Int J Medical Robotics and Computer Assisted Surgery 1(2):86-100.
44. DiMaio S, Fischer G, Haker S, Hata N, Iordachita I, Tempany C, et al. 2006. A system for MRI-guided prostate interventions. In Proc First IEEE/RAS-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical Robotics and Biomechatronics (BioRob).
45. Innomedic - touch the future. Available at: http://www.innomedic.de/
46. Ganesh G, Gassert R, Bleuler H, Burdet E. 2004. Dynamics and control of an MRI compatible master-slave system with hydrostatic transmission. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), vol. 2. p 1288-1294.
47. Kim D, Kobayashi E, Dohi T, Sakuma I. 2002. A new, compact MR-compatible surgical manipulator for minimally invasive liver surgery. In Proc 5th International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI). p 164-169.
48. MRI compatible wrist robot. Available at: http://web.mit.edu/hogan/www/ Projects/MRI_Wrist_Robot.htm
49. Tajima F, Kishi K, Nishizawa K, Kan K, Ishii H, Sudo K, et al. 2004. A prototype master-slave system consisting of two MR-compatible manipulators with interchangeable surgical tools. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 2505-2510.
50. Shinsei Corporation Inc. Available at: http://www.tky.3web.ne.jp/ ~usrmotor/English/html/
51. Harrington G, Wright C, Downs J. 2000. A new vibrotactile stimulator for functional MRI. Hum Brain Mapp 10(3):140-145.
52. Flueckiger M, Bullo M, Chapuis D, Gassert R, Perriard Y. 2005. fMRI compatible haptic interface actuated with traveling wave ultrasonic motor. Proc IEEE Industry Applications Society (IAS), vol. 3. p 2075-2082.
53. Shimizu T, Izawa J, Toyama S, Ito K. 2005. Development of MRI compatible manipulandum using ultrasonic motors. Technical Report of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE). p 21-24.
54. Niino T, Egawa S, Higuchi T. 1995. Dual excitation multiphase electrostatic drive. In Proc IEEE Industry Applications Society Annual Meeting (IAS). p 1318-1325.
55. Choi H, Jung K, Kwak J, Lee S, Kim H, Jeon J, et al. 2003. Digital polymer motor for robotic applications. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 1857-1862.
56. Mazzone A, Zhang R, Kunz A, Kovacs G, Michel S. 2003. Novel actuators for haptic displays based on electroactive polymers. In Proc ACM Symposium on Virtual Reality Software and Technology. p 196-204.
57. Malone E. 2004. Freeform fabrication of electroactive polymer actuators and electromechanical devices. In Proc 15th Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium. p 697-708.
58. Nakano M, Mazzone A, Piffaretti F, Gassert R, Nakao M, Bleuler H. 2005. IPMC actuator array as 3-d haptic display. In Proc SPIE, Smart Structures and Materials: Electroactive Polymer Actuators and Devices (EAPAD), vol. 5759. p 339-347.
59. Vogan J, Wingert A, Plante J, Dubowsky S, Hafez M. 2004. Manipulation in MRI devices using electrostrictive polymer actuators: With an application to reconfigurable imaging coils. Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 2498-2504.
60. Khanicheh A, Muto A, Triantafyllou C, Weinberg B, Astrakas L, Tzika A, et al. 2005. MR compatible ERF driven hand rehabilitation device. Proc IEEE 9th International Conference on Rehabilitation Robotics (ICORR). p 7-12.
61. Smart Technology Limited. Available at: http://www.smarttec.co.uk
62. Chapuis D, Gassert R, Burdet E, Bleuler H. 2006. Hybrid ultrasonic motor and electrorheological clutch system for MR-compatible haptic rendering. In Proc IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS).
63. Roberts T, Hassenzahl W, Arenson R. 2002. Remote control of catheter tip deflection: an opportunity for interventional MRI. J Magn Reson Med 48(6):1091-1095.
64. Zaman A, Singh K, Bimson W, Roberts N. 2000. An fMRI study of brain activation during active and passive finger movement. Hum Brain Mapp.
65. Function magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of motor behavior and motor learning. Available at: http://www.bme.jhu.edu/~reza/imaging.htm
66. Yamamoto A, Hirano Y, Ichiyanagi K, Higuchi T. 2006. Development of a 1-DOF haptic device using an electrostatic film motor for fMRI studies. In Proc IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA). p 4378-4380.