Does parental divergence predict reproductive compatibility?

Trends in Ecology and Evolution

Volumn 17, Issue 11, 2002, Pages 520-527

  Edmands, Suzanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSERVATION GENETICS; DIVERGENCE; EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY; HYBRIDIZATION; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION;

BREEDING; EVOLUTION; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GEOGRAPHY; HETEROSIS; HYBRIDIZATION; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; REPRODUCTION; REVIEW; SPECIES DIFFERENTIATION; TAXONOMY; ZYGOTE;

ACARI; ANIMALIA;

EID: 0036837389     PISSN: 01695347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0169-5347(02)02585-5     Document Type: Review

References (80)

1. Barton N.H. The role of hybridization in evolution. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;551-568.
2. Rhymer J.M., Simberloff D. Extinction by hybridization and introgression. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 27:1996;83-109.
3. Storfer A. Gene flow and endangered species translocations: a topic revisited. Biol. Conserv. 87:1999;173-180.
4. Johnson M.S. Measuring and interpreting genetic structure to minimize the genetic risks of translocations. Aquacult. Res. 31:2000;133-143.
5. Allendorf F.W., et al. The problem with hybrids: setting conservation guidelines. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;613-622.
6. Wolf D.E., et al. Predicting the risk of extinction through hybridization. Conserv. Biol. 15:2001;1039-1053.
7. Mills L.S., Allendorf F.W. The one-migrant-per-generation rule in conservation and management. Conserv. Biol. 10:1996;1509-1518.
8. Land E.D., Lacy R.C. Introgression level achieved through Florida Panther genetic introgression. Endang. Species Update. 17:2000;100-105.
9. Keller L.F., Waller D.M. Inbreeding effects in wild populations. Trends Ecol. Evol. 17:2002;230-241.
10. Wu C.-I. The genic view of the process of speciation. J. Evol. Biol. 14:2001;851-865.
11. Rieseberg L.H. Chromosomal rearrangements and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;351-358.
12. Britton-Davidian J. How do chromosomal changes fit in? J. Evol. Biol. 14:2001;872-873.
13. Arnold M. Natural Hybridization and Evolution. 1997;Oxford University Press.
14. Hendry A.P., et al. Rapid evolution of reproductive isolation in the wild: evidence from introduced salmon. Science. 290:2000;516-518.
15. Burton R.S. Differentiation and integration of the genome in populations of the marine copepod Tigriopus californicus. Evolution. 41:1987;504-513.
16. Gharrett A.J., et al. Outbreeding depression in hybrids between odd- and even-brood year pink salmon. Aquaculture. 173:1999;117-129.
17. Emlen J.M. Heterosis and outbreeding depression: a multilocus model and application to salmon production. Fish. Res. 12:1991;187-212.
18. Pusey A., Wolf M. Inbreeding avoidance in animals. Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:1996;201-206.
19. Gleason J.M., Ritchie M.G. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni complex: do sexual signals diverge the most quickly? Evolution. 52:1998;1493-1500.
20. Panhius T.M., et al. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16:2001;364-371.
21. Fenster C.B., Sork V.L. Effect of crossing distance and male parent on in vivo pollen tube growth in Chamaecrista fasciculata. Am. J. Bot. 75:1988;1898-1903.
22. Lonsdale D.L., et al. Reproductive compatibility among latitudinally separated Scottolana canadensis (Willey) (Harpacticoida). Hydrobiologia. 167:1988;469-476.
23. Lessios H.A., Cunningham C.W. Gametic incompatibility between species of the sea urchin Echinometra on the two sides of the Isthmus of Panama. Evolution. 44:1990;933-941.
24. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution. 43:1989;362-381.
25. Knowlton N., et al. Divergence in proteins, mitochondrial DNA, and reproductive compatibility across the Isthmus of Panama. Science. 260:1993;1629-1632.
26. Sasa M.M., et al. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution. 52:1998;1811-1820.
27. Waser N.M. Population structure, optimal outbreeding, and assortative mating in angiosperms. Thornhill N.M., The Natural History of Inbreeding and Outbreeding: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives. 1993;173-199 University of Chicago Press.
28. Edmands S. Heterosis and outbreeding depression in interpopulation crosses spanning a wide range of divergence. Evolution. 53:1999;1757-1768.
29. Grosberg R.K. Limited dispersal and proximity-dependent mating success in the colonial ascidian Botryllus schlosseri. Evolution. 41:1987;372-384.
30. Montalvo A.M., Ellstrand N.C. Nonlocal transplantation and outbreeding depression in the subshrub Lotus scoparius (Fabaceae). Am. J. Bot. 88:2001;258-269.
31. Coyne J., Orr H.A. The evolutionary genetics of speciation. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 353:1998;287-305.
32. Tiffin P., et al. Asymmetrical crossing barriers in angiosperms. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 268:2001;861-867.
33. Coyne J.A., Orr H.A. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila' revisited. Evolution. 51:1997;295-303.
34. Endler J.A. Geographic Variation, Speciation and Clines. 1977;Princeton University Press.
35. Moll R.H., et al. The relationship of heterosis and genetic divergence in maize. Genetics. 52:1965;139-144.
36. Fenster C.B., Galloway L.F. Population differentiation in an annual legume: genetic architecture. Evolution. 54:2000;1157-1172.
37. Felsenstein J. Phylogenies and the comparative method. Am. Nat. 125:1985;1-15.
38. Tilley S.G., et al. Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 87:1990;2715-2719.
39. Waser N.M., Price M.V. Crossing distance effects on prezygotic performance in plants: an argument for female choice. Oikos. 68:1993;303-308.
40. Vacquier V.D. Evolution of gamete recognition proteins. Science. 281:1998;1995-1998.
41. Trame A.M., et al. Field and genetic studies testing optimal outcrossing in Agave schottii, a long-lived clonal plant. Oecologia. 104:1995;93-100.
42. Waser N.M., Price M.V. Crossing-distance effects in Delphinium nelsonii: outbreeding and inbreeding depression in progeny fitness. Evolution. 48:1994;842-852.
43. Grant V., Grant A. Genetic and taxonomic studies in Gilia. Aliso. 4:1960;435-481.
44. Levins R. Evolution in Changing Environments. 1968;Princeton University Press.
45. Rand D.M. Thermal habit, metabolic rate, and the evolution of mitochondrial DNA. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9:1994;125-131.
46. Ayala F.J. Vagaries of the molecular clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 94:1997;7776-7783.
47. Kimura M. The Neutral Theory of Molecular Evolution. 1983;Cambridge University Press.
48. Nei M. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. 1987;Columbia University Press.
49. Thorpe J.P., Solé-Cava A.M. The use of allozyme electrophoresis in invertebrate systematics. Zool. Scr. 23:1994;3-18.
50. Avise J.C., et al. Species durations and Pleistocene effects of vertebrate phylogeography. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. Ser. B. 265:1998;1707-1712.
51. Prager E.M., Wilson A.C. Slow evolutionary loss of the potential for interspecific hybridization in birds: a manifestation of slow regulatory evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 72:1975;200-204.
52. Zeh D.W., Zeh J.A. Reproductive mode and speciation: the viviparity-driven conflict hypothesis. Bioessays. 22:2000;938-946.
53. Hercus M.J., Hoffmann A.A. Desiccation resistance in interspecific Drosophila crosses: genetic interactions and trait correlations. Genetics. 151:1999;1493-1502.
54. Kelemen L., Moritz C. Comparative phylogeography of a sibling pair of rainforest Drosophila species (Drosophila serrata and D. birchii). Evolution. 53:1999;1306-1311.
55. Hotz H., et al. Spontaneous heterosis in larval life history traits of hemiclonal frog hybrids. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 96:1999;2171-2176.
56. Chao L., Carr D.E. The molecular clock and the relationship between population size and generation time. Evolution. 47:1993;688-690.
57. Marzluff J.M., Dial K.P. Life history correlates of taxonomic diversity. Ecology. 72:1991;428-439.
58. Turelli M., Orr H.A. Dominance, epistasis and the genetics of postzygotic isolation. Genetics. 154:2000;1663-1679.
59. Foltz D.W. Hybridization frequency is negatively correlated with divergence time of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in a sea star (Leptasterias spp.) species complex. Evolution. 51:1997;283-288.
60. Campbell D.R., Waser N.M. Genotype-by-environment interaction and the fitness of plant hybrids in the wild. Evolution. 55:2001;669-676.
61. Rundle H.D., Whitlock M.C. A genetic interpretation of ecologically dependent isolation. Evolution. 55:2001;198-291.
62. Templeton A.R. Coadaptation and outbreeding depression. Soulé M., Conservation Biology: The Science of Scarcity and Diversity. 1986;105-116 Sinauer.
63. Heiser C.B. Hybridization between the sunflower species Helianthus annuus and H. petiolaris. Evolution. 1:1947;249-262.
64. Rieseberg L.H., et al. Role of gene interactions in hybrid speciation: evidence from ancient and experimental hybrids. Science. 272:1996;741-745.
65. Carney S.E., et al. Evolutionary changes over the fifty-year history of a hybrid population of sunflowers (Helianthus). Evolution. 54:2000;462-474.
66. Lessios H.A. Use of Panamanian sea urchins to test the molecular clock. Nature. 280:1979;599-601.
67. Waser N., Williams C. Inbreeding and outbreeding. Fox C.W., et al. Evolutionary Ecology: Concepts and Case Studies. 2001;84-96 Oxford University Press.
68. Harushima A., et al. Diverse variation of reproductive barriers in three intraspecific rice crosses. Genetics. 160:2002;313-322.
69. Naredo M.E.B., et al. Hybridization of AA genome rice species from Asia and Australia. I. Crosses and development of hybrids. Genet. Res. Crop Evol. 44:1997;17-23.
70. Koch M., et al. Molecular systematics of the Brassicaceae: evidence from coding plastidic matK and nuclear chs sequences. Am. J. Bot. 88:2001;534-544.
71. Grant M.C., Proctor V.W. Chara vulgaris and C. contraria: patterns of reproductive isolation for two cosmopolitan species complexes. Evolution. 26:1972;267-281.
72. Ganz H.H., Burton R.S. Genetic differentiation and reproductive incompatibility among Baja California populations of the copepod Tigriopus californicus. Mar. Biol. 123:1995;821-827.
73. Lee C.E. Global phylogeography of a cryptic copepod species complex and reproductive isolation between geographically proximate 'populations'. Evolution. 54:2000;2014-2027.
74. Edmands S. Phylogeography of the intertidal copepod Tigriopus californicus reveals substantially reduced population differentiation at northern latitudes. Mol. Ecol. 10:2001;1743-1750.
75. Yang, S.Y. and Patton, J.L. (1981) Genic variability and differentiation in the Galapagos finches. Auk 230-242
76. Grant P.R., Grant B.R. Hybridization of bird species. Science. 256:1992;193-197.
77. Bell D.A. Genetic differentiation, geographic variation and hybridization in gulls of the Larus glaucescens-occidentalis complex. Condor. 98:1996;527-546.
78. Wang N., et al. Crossbreeding yak (Bos grunniens) and yellow cattle (Bos taurus) - simulation of a rotational system and estimation of crossbreeding means and heterosis effects. J. Appl. Anim. Res. 6:1994;1-12.
79. Aspinwall N. Genetic analysis of North American populations of the pink salmon, Onchorhynchus gorbuscha, possible evidence for the neutral mutation-random drift hypothesis. Evolution. 28:1974;293-305.
80. Ritz L.R., et al. Phylogenetic analysis of the tribe Bovini using microsatellites. Anim. Genet. 31:2000;178-185