Rapid evolution of postzygotic reproductive isolation in stalk-eyed flies

Evolution

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 849-857

  Christianson, Sarah J ^a   Swallow, John G ^b   Wilkinson, Gerald S ^a  

^a University of Maryland   (United States)

^b University of South Dakota   (United States)

Author keywords

Cyrtodiopsis; Haldane's rule; Hybrid sterility; Postmating isolation; Premating isolation; Speciation

Indexed keywords

MATING BEHAVIOR; REPRODUCTIVE ISOLATION; SEX RATIO; SEXUAL DIMORPHISM; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

CYRTODIOPSIS; CYRTODIOPSIS DALMANNI; CYRTODIOPSIS WHITEI; DIOPSIDAE;

EID: 17844373291     PISSN: 00143820     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1554/04-291     Document Type: Article

References (51)

1. Baker, R. H., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2001. Phylogenetic analysis of eye stalk allometry and sexual dimorphism in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Evolution 55:1373-1385.
2. Baker, R. H., G. S. Wilkinson, and R. DeSalle. 2001. Phylogenetic utility of different types of molecular data used to infer evolutionary relationships among stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Syst. Biol. 50:87-105.
3. Breeuwer, J. A. J., and J. H. Werren. 1990. Microorganisms associated with chromosome destruction and reproductive isolation between two insect species. Nature 346:558-560.
4. Burkhardt, D., and I. de la Motte. 1983. How stalk-eyed flies eye stalk-eyed flies: observations and measurements of the eyes of Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diopsidae, Diptera). J. Comp. Physiol. 151:407-421.
5. Coyne, J. A., and B. Charlesworth. 1997. Genetics of a pheromonal difference affecting sexual isolation between Drosophila mauritiana and D. sechellia. Genetics 145:1015-1030.
6. Coyne, J. A., and H. A. Orr. 1989. Patterns of speciation in Drosophila. Evolution 43:362-381.
7. _. 1997. "Patterns of speciation in Drosophila" revisited. Evolution 51:295-303.
8. Coyne, J. A., A. P. Crittenden, and K. Mah. 1994. Genetics of a pheromonal difference contributing to reproductive isolation in Drosophila. Science 265:1461-1464.
9. Dobzhansky, T. 1937. Genetics and the origin of species. Columbia Univ. Press, New York.
10. Frank, S. A. 1991. Divergence of meiotic drive-suppression systems as an explanation for sex-biased hybrid sterility and inviability. Evolution 45:262-267.
11. Fry, C. L., and G. S. Wilkinson. 2004. Sperm survival in stalk-eyed flies depends on seminal fluid and meiotic drive. Evolution 58:1622-1626.
12. Gleason, J. M., and A. G. Ritchie. 1998. Evolution of courtship song and reproductive isolation in the Drosophila willistoni complex: Do sexual signals evolve the most quickly? Evolution 52:1493-1500.
13. Haldane, J. B. S. 1922. Sex ratio and unisexual sterility in hybrid animals. J. Genet. 12:101-109.
14. Hurst, L. D., and A. Pomiankowski. 1991. Causes of sex ratio bias may account for unisexual sterility in hybrids: a new explanation of Haldane's rule and related phenomena. Genetics 128:841-858.
15. Lijtmaer, D. A., B. Mahler, and P. L. Tubaro. 2003. Hybridization and postzygotic isolation patterns in pigeons and doves. Evolution 57:1411-1418.
16. Lorch, P., G. S. Wilkinson, and P. R. Reillo. 1993. Copulation duration and sperm precedence in the Malaysian stalk-eyed fly, Cyrtodiopsis whitei (Diptera: Diopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 32:303-311.
17. Manly, B. F. J. 1996. Are there clumps in body size distributions? Ecology 77:81-86.
18. Marin, I., A. Ruiz, C. Pla, and A. Fontdevila. 1993. Reproductive relationships among ten species of the Drosophila repleta group from South America and the West Indies. Evolution 47:1616-1624.
19. Mendelson, T. C. 2003. Sexual isolation evolves faster than hybrid inviability in a diverse and sexually dimorphic genus of fish (Percidae: Etheostoma). Evolution 57:317-327.
20. Moyle, L. C., M. S. Olson, and P. Tiffin. 2004. Patterns of reproductive isolation in three angiosperm genera. Evolution 58:1195-1208.
21. Muller, H. J. 1940. Bearing of the Drosophila work on systematics. Pp. in J. S. Huxley, ed. The new systematics. Clarendon, Oxford, U.K.
22. _. 1942. Isolating mechanisms, evolution and temperature. Biol. Symp. 6:71-125.
23. Orr, H. A. 1993. Haldane's rule has multiple genetic causes. Nature 361:532-533.
24. _. 1995. The population genetics of speciation: the evolution of hybrid incompatibilities. Genetics 139:1805-1813.
25. Orr, H. A., and M. Turelli. 2001. The evolution of postzygotic isolation: accumulating Dobzhansky-Muller incompatibilities. Evolution 55:1085-1094.
26. Panhuis, T. M., and G. S. Wilkinson. 1999. Exaggerated male eyes-pan influences contest outcome in stalk-eyed flies (Diopsidae). Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 46:221-227.
27. Posada, D., and K. A. Crandall. 1998. MODELTEST: testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14:817-818.
28. Presgraves, D. C. 2002. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in Lepidoptera. Evolution 56:1168-1183.
29. Presgraves, D. C., and H. A. Orr. 1998. Haldane's rule in taxa lacking a hemizygous X. Science 282:952-954.
30. 1 hybrids. J. Insect Behav. 8:595-616.
31. 1 postzygotic incompatibilities in birds. Evolution 56:2083-2089.
32. Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223-225.
33. _. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381:232-235.
34. _. 1998. Intergenomic conflict, interlocus antagonistic coevolution, and the evolution of reproductive isolation. Pp. 261-270 in D. J. Howard and S. L. Berlocher, eds. Endless forms. Oxford Univ. Press, New York.
35. Sasa, M. M., P. T. Chippindale, and N. A. Johnson. 1998. Patterns of postzygotic isolation in frogs. Evolution 52:1811-1820.
36. Smouse, P. E., J. C. Long, and R. R. Sokal. 1986. Multiple regression and correlation extensions of the Mantel test of matrix correspondence. Syst. Zool. 35:627-632.
37. Swofford, D. L. 2001. PAUP*: phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (* and other methods). Sinauer, Sunderland, MA.
38. Tao, Y., and D. L. Hartl. 2003. Genetic dissection of hybrid incompatibilities between Drosophila simulans and D. mauritiana. III. Heterogeneous accumulation of hybrid incompatibilities, degree of dominance, and implications for Haldane's rule. Evolution 57:2580-2598.
39. Tilley, S. G., P. A. Verrell, and S. J. Arnold. 1990. Correspondance between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87:2715-2719.
40. Tubaro, P. L., and D. A. Lijtmaer. 2002. Hybridization patterns and the evolution of postzygotic isolation in ducks. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 77:193-200.
41. Turelli, M., and H. A. Orr. 1995. The dominance theory of Haldane's rule. Genetics 140:389-402.
42. Werren, J. H., S. W. Skinner, and A. M. Huger. 1986. Male-killing bacteria in a parasitic wasp. Science 231:990-992.
43. Wilkinson, G. S. 2001. Genetic consequences of sexual selection in stalk-eyed flies. Pp. 72-91 in L. A. Dugatkin, ed. Model systems in behavioral ecology. Princeton Univ. Press, Princeton, NJ.
44. Wilkinson, G. S., and C. L. Fry. 2001. Meiotic drive alters sperm competitive ability in stalk-eyed flies. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 268:1-6.
45. Wilkinson, G. S., H. Kahler, and R. H. Baker. 1998a. Evolution of female mating preferences in stalk-eyed flies. Behav. Ecol. 9:525-533.
46. Wilkinson, G. S., D. C. Presgraves, and L. Crymes. 1998b. Male eyespan in stalk-eyed flies indicates genetic quality by meiotic drive suppression. Nature 391:276-279.
47. Wilkinson, G. S., J. G. Swallow, S. J. Christianson, and K. Madden. 2003. Phylogeography of sex ratio and multiple mating in stalk-eyed flies from southeast Asia. Genetica 117:37-46.
48. Wu, C.-I. 1992. A note on Haldane's rule: hybrid inviability versus hybrid sterility. Evolution 46:1584-1587.
49. Wu, C.-I., and A. W. Davis. 1993. Evolution of postmating reproductive isolation: the composite nature of Haldane's rule and its genetic bases. Am. Nat. 142:187-212.
50. Wu, C.-I., N. A. Johnson, and M. F. Palopoli. 1996. Haldane's rule and its legacy: Why are there so many sterile males? Trends Ecol. Evol. 11:281-284.
51. Zouros, E. 1973. Genetic differentiation associated with the early states of speciation in the mulleri subgroup of Drosophila. Evolution 27:601-621.