The transmission of advertisement calls in Central American frogs

Behavioral Ecology

Volumn 11, Issue 1, 2000, Pages 71-83

  Kime, Nicole M ^a   Turner, Will R ^a,c   Ryan, Michael J ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^b SMITHSONIAN TROPICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Panama)

^c University of Arizona   (United States)

Author keywords

Animal communication; Anuran; Attenuation; Degradation; Environmental acoustics; Frog

Indexed keywords

CALLING BEHAVIOR; FROG; HABITAT STRUCTURE; TRANSMITTANCE;

PANAMA;

EID: 0034096032     PISSN: 10452249     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/beheco/11.1.71     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Andersson M, 1994. Sexual selection. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
2. Bowman RI, 1979. Adaptive morphology of song dialects in Darwin's finches. J Ornithol 120:353-389.
3. Bradbury JW, Vehrencamp SL, 1998. Principles of animal communication. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates.
4. Brenowitz EA, Wilczynski W, Zakon HH, 1984. Acoustic communication in spring peepers. Environmental and behavioral aspects. J Comp Physiol A 155:585-592.
5. Brown CH, 1989. The active space of blue monkey and grey-cheeked mangabey vocalizations. Anim Behav 37:1023-1034.
6. Brown CH, Gomez R, 1992. Functional design features in primate vocal signals: the acoustic habitat and sound distortion. In: Topics in primatology, vol. 1, Human origins (Nishida T, McGrew WC, Marler P, Pickford M, deWaal F, eds). Tokyo: Tokyo University Press; 177-198.
7. Cocroft RB, Ryan MJ, 1995. Patterns of advertisement call evolution in toads and chorus frogs. Anim Behav 49:283-303.
8. Dabelsteen T, Larsen ON, Pederson SB, 1993. Habitat-induced degradation of sound signals: quantifying the effects of communication sounds and bird location on blur ratio, excess attenuation, and signal-to-noise ratio in blackbird song. J Acoust Soc Am 93:2206-2220.
9. Drewry GE, Rand AS, 1983. Characteristics of an acoustic community: Puerto Rican frogs of the genus Eleutherodactylus. Copeia 1983:941-953.
10. Duellman WE, Pyles RA, 1983. Acoustic resource partitioning in anuran communities. Copeia 1983:639-649.
11. Endler JA, 1992. Signals, signal conditions, and the direction of evolution. Am Nat 139:S125-S153.
12. Gish SL, Morton ES, 1981. Structural adaptation to local habitat acoustics in Carolina wren song. Z Tierpsychol 56:74-84.
13. Henwood K, Fabrick A, 1979. A quantitative analysis of the dawn chorus: temporal selection for communicatory optimization. Am Nat 114:260-274.
14. Hödl W, 1977. Call differences and calling site segregation in anuran species from central Amazonian floating meadows. Oecologia 28: 351-363.
15. Hunter ML, Krebs JR, 1979. Geographical variation in the song of the great tit (Parus major) in relation to ecological factors. J Anim Ecol 48:759-785.
16. Langbauer WRJ, Payne KB, Charif R, Rapaport L, Osborn F, 1991. African elephants respond to distant playbacks of low-frequency conspecific calls. J Exp Biol 157:35-46.
17. Littlejohn MJ, 1977. Long range acoustic communication in anurans. In: The reproductive biology of amphibians (Taylor DH, Guttman SI, eds). New York: Plenum Press; 263-294.
18. Loftus-Hills JJ, Littlejohn MJ, 1971. Mating-call sound intensities of anuran amphibians. J Acoust Soc Am 49:1327-1329.
19. Marten K, Marler P, 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization I. Temperate habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2: 271-20.
20. Marten K, Quine D, Marler P, 1977. Sound transmission and its significance for animal vocalization II. Tropical forest habitats. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 2:291-301.
21. Martin WF, 1967. The mechanism and evolution of sound production in the toad genus Bufo (MA dissertation). Austin: University of Texas.
22. Mathevon N, Aubin T, Dabelsteen T, 1996. Song degradation during propagation: importance of song post for the wren Troglodytes troglodytes. Ethology 102:397-412.
23. Michelsen A, Larsen ON, 1983. Strategies for acoustic communication in complex environments. In: Neuroethology and behavioral physiology (Huber F, Markl H, eds). Berlin: Springer-Verlag; 321-331.
24. Morton ES, 1975. Ecological sources of selection on avian sounds. Am Nat 109:17-34.
25. Penna M, Solis R, 1998. Frog call intensities and sound propagation in the South American temperate forest region. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 42:371-381.
26. Richards DG, Wiley RH, 1980. Reverberations and amplitude fluctuations in the propagation of sound in a forest: implications for animal communication. Am Nat 115:381-399.
27. Ryan MJ, 1985. The túngara frog: a study in sexual selection and communication. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
28. Ryan MJ, 1986. Environmental bioacoustics: evaluation of a commonly used experimental technique. Anim Behav 34:931-933.
29. Ryan MJ, 1988. Energy, calling, and selection. Am Zool 28:885-898.
30. Ryan MJ, Brenowitz EA, 1985. The role of body size, phylogeny, and ambient noise in the evolution of bird song. Am Nat 126:87-100.
31. Ryan MJ, Cocroft RB, Wilczynski W, 1990. The role of environmental selection in intraspecific divergence of mate recognition signals in the cricket frog, Acris crepitans. Evolution 44:1869-1872.
32. Ryan MJ, Keddy-Hector A, 1992. Directional patterns of female mate choice and the role of sensory biases. Am Nat 139:S4-S35.
33. Ryan MJ, Sullivan BK, 1989. Transmission effects on temporal structure in the advertisement calls of two toads, Bufo woodhausii and Bufo valliceps. Ethology 80:182-189.
34. Sorjonen J, 1983. Transmission of the two most characteristic phrases of the song of the thrush nightingale Luscina luscina in different environmental conditions. Ornis Scand 14:278-288.
35. Sorjonen J, 1986. Factors affecting the structure of song and the singing behaviour of some northern European passerine birds. Behaviour 98:286-302.
36. Stebbins RC, Cohen NW, 1995. A natural history of amphibians. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
37. Waser PM, Brown CH, 1986. Habitat acoustics and primate communication. Am J Primatol 10:135-154.
38. Waser PM, Waser MS, 1977. Experimental studies of primate vocalization: specializations for long-distance propagation. Z Tierpsychol 43:239-263.
39. Wilczynski W, Ryan MJ, 1999. Geographic variation in animal communication systems. In: Geographic variation in behavior (Foster SA, Endler JA, eds). Oxford: Oxford University Press; 234-261.
40. Wiley RH, Richards DG, 1978. Physical constraints on acoustic communication in the atmosphere: implications for the evolution of animal vocalizations. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 3:69-94.
41. Wiley RH, 1991. Associations of song properties with habitats for territorial oscine birds of eastern North America. Am Nat 138:973-993.
42. Zimmerman BL, 1982. A survey of Central Amazonian forest frog species and an analysis of structural and behavioural features of their vocalizations (PhD dissertation). Guelph, Ontario: University of Guelph.
43. Zimmerman BL, 1983. A comparison of structural features of calls of open and forest habitat frog species in the central Amazon. Herpetologica 39:235-245.