Studying for the future

Journal of Further and Higher Education

Volumn 26, Issue 3, 2002, Pages 207-227

  Hartley, James ^a  

^a KEELE UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750361904     PISSN: 0309877X     EISSN: 14699486     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03098770220149576     Document Type: Article

References (74)

1. ANDERSON-INMAN, L., and HORNEY, M., 1997. Computer-based concept mapping: Enhancing literacy with tools for visual thinking. Journal of Adolescent and Adult Literacy, 40(4): 302–306.
2. BECHER, T., 1989. Academic Tribes and Territories: the culture of disciplines, Buckingham: SRHE.
3. BELL, P., STAINES, P., and MITCHELL, J., 2001. Evaluating, Doing and Writing Research in Psychology, (2nd edn), London: Sage.
4. BlGGS, J., 1988. “ Approaches to learning and to essay writing ”. In Learning Strategies and Learning Styles, Edited by: SCHMECK, R.R., New York: Plenum.
5. BLIGH, D., 1998. What's the Use of Lectures?, (5th edn), Exeter: Intellect.
6. BOSTOCK, S., 2001. Online resources to help students evaluate online resources. Educational Developments, 2(2): 15
7. BUZAN, T., 2000. Use Your Head, (Revised edn), London: BBC Publications.
8. CARSON, R.L., 1951. The Sea Around Us, New York: Oxford University Press.
9. CATCHPOLE, R., and GARLAND, N., 1996. “ Mind maps: using research to improve the student learning experience ”. In Improving Student Learning: using research to improve student learning, Edited by: GlBBS, G., Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development at Oxford Brookes University.
10. CHANOCK, K., 2000. Comments on essays: do students understand what tutors write?. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(1): 95–105.
11. CHEN, C., and STEVENSON, H.W., 1989. Homework: a cross-cultural examination. Child Development, 60: 551–561.
12. CHENG, W., and WARREN, M., 2000. Making a difference: using peers to assess individual students' contributions to a group project. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(2): 243–255.
13. ENTWISTLE, N., and ENTWlSTLE, A., 1997. “ Revision and the experience of understanding ”. In The Experience of Learning, (2nd edn), Edited by: MARTON, F., HOUNSELL, D., and ENTWISTLE, N., Edinburgh: Scottish Academic Press.
14. FARBER, J.E., MORRIS, J.D., and LIEBERMAN, M.G., 2000. The effect of note taking on ninth grade students' comprehension. Reading Psychology, 21: 257–270.
15. FLORA, S.R., and LOGAN, R.E., 1996. Using computerized study guides to increase performance on general psychology examinations: an experimental analysis. Psychological Reports, 79: 235–241.
16. FRANCIS, H., and HALLAM, S., 2000. Genre effects on higher education students' reading for understanding. Higher Education, 39: 279–296.
17. FREEMAN, K.A., 1996. Attitudes toward work in project groups as predictors of academic performance. Small Group Research, 27(2): 265–282.
18. GlBBS, G., ed. 1992. Improving the Quality of Student Learning, Bristol: Technical and Educational Services Ltd.
19. GRABE, M., BORDAGES, W., and PETROS, T., 1990. The impact of computer supported study on student awareness of examination preparation and on examination performance. Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 17(4): 113–119.
20. GRUNEBERG, M.M., and MATHIESON, M., 1997. The perceived value of mind maps (spider diagrams) as learning and memory aids. Cognitive Technology, 2(1): 21–24.
21. HABESHAW, T., HABESHAW, S., and GIBBS, G., 1987. 53 Interesting Ways of Helping Your Students to Study, Bristol: Technical and Educational Services, Ltd.
22. HADWIN, A.F., and WINNE, P.H., 2001. CoNotes2: a software tool for promoting self-regulated learners in networked collaborative learning environments. Evaluation Research In Education, 7: 313–334.
23. HAMPSON, L., 1994. How's Your Dissertation Going?, Innovation in Higher Education Series Lancaster University.
24. HARRIS, B., 1979. Whatever happened to little Albert?. American Psychologist, 34(2): 151–160.
25. HARTLEY, J., 1998. Learning and Studying: a research perspective, London: Routledge.
26. HARTLEY, J., 2000. “ Investigating homework: an outsider's view ”. In The Applied Psychologist, (2nd edn), Edited by: HARTLEY, J., and BRANTHWATTE, A., Buckingham: Open University Press.
27. HARTLEY, J., HOWE, M.J.A., and MCKEACHIE, W.J., 2001. Writing through time: longitudinal studies of the effects of new technology on writing. British Journal of Educational Technology, 32: 141–151.
28. HARTLEY, J., and TYNJALA, P., 2001. “ New technology, writing and learning ”. In Writing as a Learning Tool: integrating theory and practice, Edited by: TYNJALA, P., MASON, L., and LONKA, K., Dordrecht: Kluwer.
29. HELWEG-LARSEN, B., 1979. Teaching the technique of patterned note making. British Journal of Guidance and Counselling, 7(1): 107–113.
30. HENDRICKS, M., and QUINN, L., 2000. Teaching referencing as an introduction to epistemological empowerment. Teaching in Higher Education, 5(4): 447–457.
31. JENKINS, L.A., 1998. “ Writing laboratory reports: individuals versus groups ”. Department of Psychology, Keele University. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation
32. JONASSEN, D.H., and GRABOWSKI, B.L., 1993. Handbook of Individual Differences, Learning and Instruction, Hillsdale, N.J.: Erlbaum.
33. KELLY, A.E., and O'DONNELL, A., 1994. Hypertext and the study strategies of preservice teachers: issues in instructional hypertext design. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 10(4): 373–387.
34. KING, A., 1999. “ Discourse patterns for mediating peer learning ”. In Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, Edited by: O'DONNELL, A.M., and KING, A., Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
35. LAHITNEN, V., LONKA, K., and LINDBLOM-YLANNE, S., 1997. Spontaneous study strategies and the quality of knowledge construction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 67(1): 13–24.
36. LANDAUER, T., EGAN, D., REMDE, J., LESK, M., LOCHBAUM, C., and KETCHUM, D., 1993. “ Enhancing the usability of text through computer delivery and formative evaluation: The Superbook project ”. In Hypertext: a psychological perspective, Edited by: MCKNIGHT, C., DlLLON, A., and RICHARDSON, J., Hemel Hempstead: Ellis Horwood.
37. LAURILLARD, D., 1979. The process of student learning. Higher Education, 8(4): 395–410.
38. LEA, M.R., and STREET, B., 2000. “ Student writing and staff feedback in higher education: an academic literacies approach ”. In Student Writing in Higher Education, Edited by: LEA, M.R., and STEIRER, B., Buckingham: Open University Press.
39. LILLIS, T.M., 2001. Student Writing: access, regulation, desire, London: Routledge.
40. LITTLE, K., 1934. Results of using machines for testing and drill upon learning in Educational Psychology. Journal of Experimental Education, 3: 45–59.
41. MACLELLAN, E., 1998. “ Student strategies when reading expository text ”. In Improving Student Learning: improving students as learners, Edited by: RUST, C., Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development at Oxford Brookes University.
42. MAKI, W.S., and MAKI, R.H., 2001. Mastery quizzes on the web: Results from a web-based introductory psychology course. Behavior Research, Methods Instruments & Computers, 33(2): 47–69.
43. MANN, S. J., 2000. The student's experience of reading. Higher Education, 39: 297–317.
44. MARTON, F., and SALJO, R., 1976. On qualitative differences in student learning: 1. Outcome and process. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 46(1): 4–11.
45. MCGEE, P., 2001. Thinking Psychologically, London: Palgrave.
46. MORGAN, A., 1993. Improving Your Students' Learning: reflections on the experience of study, London: Kogan Page.
47. NEUWIRTH, C.M., CHANDHOK, R., CHARNEY, D., WOJAHN, P., and KIM, L., Distributed collaborative writing: a comparison of spoken and written modalities for reviewing and revising documents. Proceedings of the Computer-Human Interaction 1994 Conference. Boston, Massachusetts, New York. pp. 51–57. Association for Computing Machinery.
48. NORTON, L., 1981. Patterned note-taking: an evaluation. Visible Language, XV(1): 67–85.
49. O'DONNELL, A., 1999. “ Structuring dyadic interaction through scripted cooperation ”. In Cognitive Perspectives on Peer Learning, Edited by: O'DONNELL, A.M., and KING, A., Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
50. O'DONNELL, A., and DANSEREAU, D., 1994. Learning from lectures: effects of co-operative review. Journal of Experimental Education, 61(2): 116–125.
51. OLIVER, K., 2001. Recommendations for student tools in on-line course management systems. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 13(1): 47–69.
52. PENNEBAKER, J.W., and KING, L.A., 1999. Linguistic styles: language use as an individual difference. Journal of Personal and Social Psychology, 77: 1296–1312.
53. PlNKNEY, M., 1998. “ An assessment of the relationship between revision style, stress and examination performance ”. Department of Psychology, University of Keele. Unpublished undergraduate dissertation
54. PORTIER, S.J., and VAN BUUREN, H.A., 1995. An interactive learning environment (ILE) to study statistics: effects of prior knowledge on the use of embedded support devices. European Journal of Psychology of Education, X(2): 197–207.
55. PRESSEY, S.L., 1926. A simple apparatus which gives tests and scores--and teaches. School and Society, 23: 373–376.
56. PROSSER, M., and TRIGWELL, K., 1999. Understanding Learning and Teaching, Buckingham: Open University Press.
57. RICHARDSON, J.T.E., 2000. Researching Student Learning: approaches to studying in campus-based and distance education, Buckingham: Open University Press.
58. ROBINSON, D.H., and SKINNER, C.H., 1996. Why graphic organizers facilitate search processes: fewer words or computationally efficient indexing?. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 21(2): 166–180.
59. ROBINSON, P.P., 1961. Effective Study, New York: Harper and Row.
60. SHARPLES, M., 1999. How We Write, London: Routledge.
61. SLOTTE, V., and LONKA, K., 1999. Review and process effects of spontaneous note-taking on comprehension. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 34: 1–20.
62. SPECK, B.W.M., JOHNSON, T.R., DICE, C.P., and HEATON, L.B., 1999. Collaborative Writing: an annotated bibliography, Westport, Connecticut: Greenwood Press.
63. TANG, C., 1998. “ Effects of collaborative learning on the quality of assignments ”. In Teaching and Learning in Higher Education, Edited by: DART, B., and BOULTONLEWIS, G., Melbourne: Australian Council for Educational Research Ltd.
64. TARABAN, R., RYNEARSON, K., and KERR, M., 2000. College students' academic performance and self-reports of comprehension strategy use. Reading Psychology, 21: 283–308.
65. TOPPING, K., 1998. Peer assessment between students in colleges and universities. Review of Educational Research, 68(3): 249–276.
66. TORRANCE, M., THOMAS, G.V., and ROBINSON, E., 2000. Individual differences in undergraduate essay-writing strategies: a longitudinal study. Higher Education, 39: 181–200.
67. VAN DEN BOSCH, H., and BOLLUYT, J., 2001. The use of hypertext in the writing of group papers. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 17(4): 355–362.
68. VAN METER, P., YOKOI, L., and PRESSLEY, M., 1994. College students' theory of notetaking derived from their perceptions of note-taking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 86(3): 323–338.
69. VAN OOSTENDORP, H., 1996. “ Studying and annotating electronic text ”. In Hypertext and Cognition, Edited by: ROUET, J-F., LEVONEN, J.J., DILLON, A., and SPIRO, R., Mahwah, N.J.: Erlbaum.
70. WADE, S.E., TRATHEN, W., and SCHRAW, G., 1990. An analysis of spontaneous study strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25: 147–166.
71. WEITEN, W., 1994. Psychology: themes and variations, (2nd edn, briefer edition), Pacific Grove, C.A.: Brooks Cole.
72. WHIPPLE, G.M., 1910. The spelling of university students. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1: 31–33.
73. WILLIAMS, J.M., 1997. Style: ten lessons in clarity and grace, (5th edn), New York: Longman.
74. ZIMMERMAN, C., BISANZ, G.L., BISANZ, J., KLEIN, J.S., and KLEIN, P., 2001. Science at the supermarket: a comparison of what appears in the popular press, experts' advice to readers, and what students want to know. Public Understanding of Science, 10: 37–58.