Web credibility

Encyclopedia of Human Computer Interaction

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 713-721

  Danielson, David R ^a  

^a STANFORD UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33750359223     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-562-7.ch107     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Abdulla, R. A., Garrison, B., Salwen, M., Driscoll, P., & Casey, D. (2002). The credibility of newspapers, television news, and online news. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Convention, Miami Beach, FL.
2. Andie, T. (1997). Why Web warriors might worry. Columbia Journalism Review, 36, 35-39.
3. Burbules, N. C. (2001). Paradoxes of the Web: The ethical dimensions of credibility. Library Trends, 49, 441-453.
4. Campbell, M. K., Bernhardt, J. M., Waldmiller, M., Jackson, B., Potenziani, D., Weathers, B., et al. (1999). Varying the message source in computertailored nutrition education. Patient Education & Counseling, 36, 157-169.
5. Cho, C. (1999). How advertising works on the WWW: Modified elaboration likelihood model. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 21, 34-50.
6. Choi, S. M., & Rifon, N. J. (2002). Antecedents and consequences of Web advertising credibility: A study of consumer response to banner ads. Journal of Interactive Advertising, 3(1). Available at http://www.jiad.org/vol3/no1/chio/
7. Cialdini, R. (2001). Influence: Science and practice. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
8. Dutta-Bergman, M. J. (2004). The impact of completeness and Web use motivation on the credibility of e-health information. Journal of Communication, 54, 253-269.
9. Eastin, M. S. (2001). Credibility assessments of online health information: The effects of source expertise and knowledge of content. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 6(4). Available at http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol6/issue4/eastin.html
10. Eysenbach, G., & Köhler, C. (2002). How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the World Wide Web? Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews. BMJ, 324, 573-577.
11. Flanagin, A. J., & Metzger, M. J. (2000). Perceptions of Internet information credibility. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 515-540.
12. Fogg, B. J. (2002). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility [Research report]. Stanford University, Stanford Persuasive Technology Lab, CA. Retrieved from http://credibility.stanford.edu/
13. Fogg, B. J. (2003a). Persuasive technology: Using computers to change what we think and do. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann.
14. Fogg, B. J. (2003b). Prominence-interpretation theory: Explaining how people assess credibility online. Proceedings of CHI'03, Extended on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 722-723).
15. Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Kameda, T., Solomon, J., Rangnekar, A., Boyd, J., et al. (2001). Web credibility research: A method for online experiments and early study results. Proceedings of CHI'01, Extended on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 295-296).
16. Fogg, B. J., Marshall, J., Laraki, O., Osipovich, A., Varma, C., Fang, N., et al. (2001). What makes Web sites credible? A report on a large quantitative study. Proceedings of CHI'01, Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 61-68).
17. Fogg, B. J., Soohoo, C., Danielson, D. R., Marable, L., Stanford, J., & Tauber, E. R. (2003). How do users evaluate the credibility of Web sites? A study with over 2,500 participants [Extended Consumer WebWatch report]. Proceedings of DUX2003, Designing for User Experiences Conference. Retrieved from http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report3_credibilityresearch/stanfordPTL.htm
18. Fogg, B. J., & Tseng, H. (1999). The elements of computer credibility. Proceedings of CHI'01, Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 80-87).
19. Graefe, G. (2003). Incredible information on the Internet: Biased information provision and lack of credibility as a cause of insufficient information quality. Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Information Quality (pp. 133-146).
20. Greer, J. D. (2003). Evaluating the credibility of online information: A test of source and advertising influence. Mass Communication & Society, 6(1), 11-28.
21. Hovland, C. I., Jannis, I. L., & Kelley, H. H. (1953). Communication and persuasion. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
22. Hovland, C. I., & Weiss, W. (1951). The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness. Public Opinion Quarterly, 15, 635-650.
23. Johnson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (1998). Cruising is believing? Comparing Internet and traditional sources on media credibility measures. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 75, 325-340.
24. Kim, J., & Moon, J. (1998). Designing towards emotional usability in customer interfaces: Trustworthiness of cyber-banking system interfaces. Interacting with Computers, 10, 1-29.
25. Klein, K. B. (2001). User perceptions of data quality: Internet and traditional text sources. Journal of Information Systems, 41(4), 5-15.
26. Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41, 271-290.
27. Nelson, P. (1974). Advertising as information. Journal of Political Economy, 82, 729-754.
28. Newhagen, J., & Nass, C. I. (1989). Differential criteria for evaluating credibility of newspapers and TV news. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 277-284.
29. Nozato, Y. (2002). Credibility of online newspapers. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Convention, Washington, DC.
30. Payne, G. A., Dozier, D. M., & Nomai, A. J. (2001). Newspapers and the Internet: A comparative assessment of news credibility. Paper presented at the Association for Education in Journalism and Mass Communication Annual Convention, Miami Beach, FL.
31. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1981). Attitudes and persuasion: Classic and contemporary approaches. Dubuque, IL: W. C. Brown Co. Publishers.
32. Petty, R. E., & Cacioppo, J. T. (1986). Elaboration likelihood model. In L. Berkowitz (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (Vol. 19, pp. 123-205).
33. Riegelsberger, J., Sasse, M. A., & McCarthy, J. D. (2003). Shiny, happy people building trust? Photos on e-commerce Websites and consumer trust. Proceedings of CHI'03, Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 121-128).
34. Rieh, S. Y. (2002). Judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 145-161.
35. Rieh, S. Y., & Belkin, N. J. (1998). Understanding judgment of information quality and cognitive authority in the WWW. Proceedings of the 61 st Annual Meeting for the American Society for Information Science, 35.
36. Roberts, L., Rankin, L., Moore, D., Plunkett, S., Washburn, D., & Wilch-Ringen, B. (2003). Looks good to me. Proceedings of CHI'03, Extended Abstracts on Human Factors in Computing Systems (pp. 818-819).
37. Robinson, T. J., & Kaye, B. K. (2000). Using is believing: The influence of reliance on the credibility of online political information among politically interested Internet users. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 77, 865-879.
38. Self, C. S. (1996). Credibility. In M. Salwen & D. Stacks (Eds.), An integrated approach to communication theory and research (pp. 421-441). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
39. Shamdasani, P. N., Stanaland, A., & Tan, J. (2001). Location, location, location: Insights for advertising placement on the Web. Journal of Advertising Research, 41, 7-21.
40. Slater, M. D., & Rouner, D. (1996). How message evaluation and source attributes may influence credibility assessment and belief change. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 73, 974-991.
41. Stanford, J., Tauber, E. R., Fogg, B. J., & Marable, L. (2002). Experts vs. online consumers: A comparative credibility study of health and finance Web sites. Consumer WebWatch. Retrieved from http://www.consumerwebwatch.org/news/report3_credibilityresearch/slicedbread_abstract.htm
42. Sundar, S. (1999). Exploring receivers' criteria for perception of print and online news. Journalism and Mass Communication Quarterly, 76, 373-386.
43. Tate, M., & Alexander, J. (1996). Teaching critical evaluation skills for World Wide Web resources. Computers in Libraries, 16, 49-55.
44. Toms, E. G., & Taves, A. R. (2004). Measuring user perceptions of Web site reputation. Information Processing and Management, 40, 291-317.
45. Tseng, H., & Fogg, B. J. (1999). Credibility and computing technology. Communications of the ACM, 42(5), 39-44.
46. Wathen, C. N., & Burkell, J. (2002). Believe it or not: Factors influencing credibility on the Web. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 53, 134-144.