Traces of prior art: An analysis of non-patent references found in patent documents

Scientometrics

Volumn 69, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 3-20

  Callaert, Julie ^a   Van Looy, Bart ^a,b   Verbeek, Arnold ^b   Debackere, Koenraad ^a,b   Thijs, Bart ^b  

^a Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33748712842     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11192-006-0135-8     Document Type: Review

References (60)

1. ACOSTA, M., CORONADO, D. (2003), Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents, Research Policy, 32 (10) : 1783-1803.
2. Acs, Z. J., ANSELIN, L., VARGA, A. (2002), Patents and innovation counts as measures of regional production of new knowledge, Research Policy, 31 : 1069-1085.
3. AKERS, N. J. (2000), The referencing of prior art documents in European patents and applications, World Patent Information, 22 : 309-315.
4. BALCONI, M., BRESCHI, S., LISSONI, F. (2004), Networks of inventors and the role of academia: An exploration of Italian patent data, Research Policy, 33 (1) : 127-145.
5. GALLON, M., LAW J., RIP A. (1986), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology: Sociology of Science in the Real World. Sheridan House.
6. DAVID, P.A., FORAY, D., STEINMUELLER, W. E. (1997), The research network and the new economics of science: From metaphors to organizational behaviour. In: GAMBARDELLA, A., MALERBA, F. (Eds), The Organisation of Innovative Activities in Europe. Cambridge University Press.
7. DOSI, G. (2000), Innovation, Organization and Economic Dynamics. Edward Elgar Publishers, Cheltenham, UK.
8. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and "Mode 2" to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations, Research Policy, 29 (2) : 109-123.
9. FLEMING, L., SORENSON, O. (2001), Technology as a complex adaptive system: Evidence from patent data. Research Policy, 30 : 1019-1039.
10. FORAY, D. (2004), The Economics of Knowledge. The MIT Press.
11. FREEMAN, C. (1987), Technology Policy and Economic Performance. Pinter, London.
12. FREEMAN, C. (1994), The economics of technical change, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18 : 463-514.
13. FURMAN, J. L., PORTER, E. P., STERN, S. (2002), The determinants of national innovative capacity, Research Policy, 31 : 899-933.
14. GRILICHES, Z. (1990), Patent statistics as economic indicators: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 28: 1661-1707.
15. GRUPP, H., SCHMOCH, U. (1999), Patent statistics in the age of globalisation: New legal procedures, new analytical methods, new economic interpretation? Research Policy, 28 : 377-396.
16. HARHOFF, D., SCHERER, F.M., VOPEL, K. (2003), Citations, family size, opposition and the value of patent rights, Research Policy, 32 (8) : 1343-1363.
17. HICKS, D., NARIN, F. (2004), Strategic Research Alliances and 360 Degree Bibliometric Indicators, CHI Research Inc., Strategic research partnerships: proceedings from an NSF workshop.
18. JAFFE, A. B., TRAJTENBERG, M., FOGARTY, M. S. (2000), Knowledge spillovers and patent citations: Evidence from a survey of inventors, American Economic Review, 90 (2) : 215-218.
19. JAFFE, A. B., TRAJTENBERG, M., HENDERSON, R. (Eds) (2002), Patents, Citations, and Innovations: A Window on the Knowledge Economy. MIT Press.
20. KATZ, J. S., HICKS, D. (1998), Indicators for Systems of Innovation. A Bibliometric-Based Approach, IDEA Paper Series, no 12, STEP Group.
21. LEHMAN, B. A. (2001), Presentation CIBC World Markets, New York, May 3, 2001.
22. LUNDVALL, B.-Å. (1992), National Systems of Innovation. Pinter, London.
23. MCMILLAN, S., NARIN, F., DEEDS, D. (2000), An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: The case of biotechnology, Research Policy, 29 : 1-8.
24. MEYER, M. (2000a), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature, Research Policy, 29 :409-434.
25. MEYER, M. (2000b), Patent citations in a novel field of technology - What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics, 48 (2) : 151-178.
26. MEYER, M. (2001), Patent citation analysis in a novel field of technology: An exploration of nano-science and nano-technology, Scientometrics, 51 (1) : 163-183.
27. MEYER, M., SINILAINEN, T., UTECHT, J. T. (2003), Towards hybrid Triple Helix indicators: A study of university-related patents and a survey of academic inventors, Scientometrics, 58 (2) : 321-350.
28. MICHEL, J., BETTELS, B. (2001), Patent citation analysis: A closer look at the basic input data from patent search reports, Scientometrics, 51 : 185-201.
29. MOWERY, D. C., NELSON, R. R. (1999), Sources of Industrial Leadership. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. MURRAY, F. (2004), The role of academic inventors in entrepreneurial firms: Sharing the laboratory life, Research Policy, 33 (4) : 643-659.
31. NARIN, F., NOMA, E. (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 1 : 369-381.
32. NARIN, F., HAMILTON, K., OLIVASTRO, D. (1997), The increasing linkage between US technology and public science, Research Policy, 26 (3) : 317-330.
33. NELSON, R. R. (Ed.) (1993), National Innovation Systems. Oxford University Press, New York.
34. NELSON, R. R., ROSENBERG, N. (1993), Technical innovation and national systems. In: NELSON, R. R. (Ed.), National Innovation Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford, pp. 3-21.
35. NOYONS, E. C. M., VAN RAAN, A. F. J., GRUPP, H., SCHMOCH, U. (1994), Exploring the science and technology interface: Inventor-author relations in laser medicine research, Research Policy, 23 : 443-457.
36. OPPENHEIM, C. (2000), Do patent citations count? In: CRONIN, B., ATKINS, H. B. (Eds), The Web of Knowledge: A Festschrift in Honor of Eugene Carfield. Metford, NJ: Information Today Inc. ASIST Monograph Series, pp. 405-432.
37. PACKER, A., WEBSTER, K. (1996), Patenting culture in Science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility, Science, Technology and Human Values, 21 (4) : 427-453.
38. PAVITT, K. (1997), Academic research, technical change and government policy. In: KRIGE, J., PESTRE, D. (Eds), Science in the Twentieth Century. Harwood Academic Publishers, Amsterdam, pp. 143-158.
39. PRICE, D. DE SOLLA (1963), Little Science, Big Science. Columbia University Press.
40. PRICE, D. DE SOLLA (1965), Is technology historically independent of Science? A study in statistical historiography, Journal of Technology and Culture, 6 : 553-568.
41. PRITCHARD, A. (1969), Statistical bibliography or bibliometrics? Journal of Documentation, 24 : 348-349.
42. REITZIG, M. (2004), Improving patent valuations for management purposes - validating new indicators by analyzing application rationales. Research Policy, 33 : 939-957.
43. SAMPAT, B. (2004), Examining Patent Examination: An Analysis of Examiner and Applicant Generated Prior Art, Working Paper, School of Public Policy, Georgia Institute of Technology.
44. SCHMOCH, U. (1993), Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators, Scientometrics, 26 (1) : 193-211.
45. SCHMOCH, U. (1997), Indicators and the relations between science and technology, Scientometrics, 38(1) : 103-116.
46. SCHMOOKLER, J. (1966), Invention and Economic Growth, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
47. SCHUBERT, A., GLÄNZEL, W., BRAUN, T. (1989), World flash on basic research: Scientometric datafiles. A comprehensive set of indicators on 2649 journals and 96 countries in all major science fields and subfields, 1981-1985, Scientometrics, 16 (1-6) : 3-478.
48. SCHWANDER, P. (2000), An evaluation of patent searching resources: Comparing the professional and free online databases, World Patent Information, 22 : 147-165.
49. STEINMUELLER, W. E. (1994), Basic research and industrial innovation. In: DODGSON, M., ROTHWELL, R. (Eds), The Handbook of Industrial Innovation, Edward Elgar, Aldershot, pp. 54-66.
50. TUSSEN, R. J. W. (2001), Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: Patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows, Research Policy, 30 : 35-54.
51. TIJSSEN, R. J. W. (2002), Science dependence of technologies: Evidence from inventors and their inventions, Research Policy, 31 (4) : 509-526.
52. TIJSSEN, R. J. W., BUTER, R. K., VAN LEEUWEN, T. N. (2000), Technological relevance of science: Validation and analysis of citation linkages between patents and research papers, Scientometrics, 47 : 389-412.
53. TRIPPE, A. J. (2003), Patinformatics: Tasks to tools, World Patent Information, 25 : 211-221.
54. VAN LOOY, B., CALLAERT, J., DEBACKERE, K., VERBEEK, A. (2003a), Patent-related indicators for assessing knowledge-generating institutions: Towards a contextualised approach, Journal of Technology Transfer, 28 : 53-61.
55. VAN LOOY, B., ZIMMERMANN, E., VEUGELERS, R., VERBEEK, A., MELLO, J., DEBACKERE, K. (2003b), Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? Scientometrics, 57 (3) : 355-367.
56. VAN RAAN, A. F. J. (Ed.) (1988), Handbook of Quantitative Studies of Science and Technology. North-Holland, Amsterdam.
57. VAN VIANEN, B., MOED H., VAN RAAN, A. (1990), An exploration of the science base of recent technology, Research Policy, 19 : 61-81.
58. VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., ANDRIES, P., ZTMMERMANN, E., DELEUS, F. (2002a), Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes, Scientometrics, 54 (3) : 399-420.
59. VERBEEK, A., CALLAERT, J., ANDRIES, P., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., VEUGELERS, R. (2002b), Science and Technology Interplay - A Modelling Approach on a Regional Level, Final Report to the EC DG Research, Brussels.
60. VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M. (2003), Science cited in patents: A geographic 'flow' analysis of bibliographic citation patterns in patents, Scientometrics, 58 (2) : 241-263.