Patenting culture in science: Reinventing the scientific wheel of credibility

Science Technology and Human Values

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 1996, Pages 427-453

  Packer, Kathryn ^a   Webster, Andrew ^a  

^a ANGLIA RUSKIN UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0030489178     PISSN: 01622439     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/016224399602100403     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Bourdieu, P. 1974. The specificity of the scientific field and the social conditions of the progress of reason. Social Science Information 6:110-35.
2. Bozeman, B., and M. Crow. 1991. Technology transfer from U.S. government and university R&D. Science and Public Policy 11:231-46.
3. Brooks, H. 1993. Research universities and the social contract for science. In Empowering technology, edited by L. M. Branscomb, 202-34. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
4. Cambrosio, A 1994. Standards, instruments and techniques. Paper presented at EASST conference, Science, Technology and Change: New Theories, Realities, Institutions, 28-31 August, Budapest, Hungary.
5. Collins, H. 1985. Changing order. New York: Russell Sage.
6. Eisenberg, R. 1987. Proprietary rights and the norms of science in biotechnology research. Yale Law Journal 97:177-231.
7. Etzkowitz, H. 1993. Entrepreneurs from science: The origins of science-based regional economic development. Minerva 31:326-60.
8. Fujimura, J. H. 1987. Constructing "do-able" problems in cancer research: Articulating alignment. Social Studies of Science 17:257-93.
9. Hagstrom, W. O. 1966. The scientific community. New York: Basic Books.
10. Knorr-Cetina, K. 1995. Laboratory studies: The cultural approach to the study of science. In Handbook of sociology of science and technology studies, edited by S. Jasanoff, G. Markle, J. C. Petersen, and T. Pinch, 140-66. London: Sage.
11. Krimsky, S. 1991. Academic-corporate ties in biotechnology: A quantitative study. Science, Technology, & Human Values 16:275-87.
12. Latour, B., and S. Woolgar. 1986. Laboratory life: The construction of scientific facts. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Lynch, M. 1985. Art and artefact in laboratory science. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. Mackenzie, M., P. Keating, and A. Cambrosio. 1990. Patents and free scientific information on biotechnology: Making monoclonal antibodies property. Science, Technology, & Human Values 15:65-83.
15. Mullis, K. 1990. The unusual origin of the polymerase chain reaction. Scientific American 263:36-43.
16. Myers, G. 1995. From discovery to invention: The writing and rewriting of two patents. Social Studies of Science 25:57-105.
17. Narin, F. 1994. Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics 31:147-55.
18. Packer, K., and A. Webster. 1995. Inventing boundaries: The prior art of the social world. Social Studies of Science 25:107-18.
19. Rappert, B. 1995. Shifting notions of accountability in public and private sector research in the UK: Some central concerns. Science and Public Policy 22:383-90.
20. Rip, A. 1994. The republic of science in the 1990s. Higher Education 28:3-23.
21. Seashore Louis, K., M. Anderson, and L. Rosenberg. Forthcoming. The changing context of science and university-industry relations: Academic misconduct and academic values. In Capitalizing knowledge, edited by A. Webster and H. Etzkowitz. New York: State University of New York Press.
22. Star, S. L. 1986. Triangulating clinical and basic research. History of Science 26:29-48.
23. Swinbanks, D. 1994. T1 loses patent battle to Fujitsu. Nature 371:92.
24. Webster, A. 1994. University-corporate ties and the construction of research agendas. Sociology 28:123-42.
25. Williams, K. M. 1994. When is a "private" conversation "public" disclosure? Bio/technology 12:523-24.