Do science-technology interactions pay off when developing technology? An exploratory investigation of 10 science-intensive technology domains

Scientometrics

Volumn 57, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 355-367

  Van Looy, Bart ^a   Zimmermann, Edwin ^b   Veugelers, Reinhilde ^a,b   Verbeek, Arnold ^a   Mello, Johanna ^b   Debackere, Koenraad ^a,b  

^a Katholieke Universiteit Leuven   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 2442616635     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1025052617678     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. ANDERSEN, B. (2001), Technological Change and the Evolution of Corporate Innovation. Edward Elgar Publishing.
2. BIJKER, W. (1995), Of Bicycles, Bakelites and Bulbs Towards a theory of socio-technical change. MIT Press.
3. COLLINS, P., WYATT, S. (1988), Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy, 17: 65-74.
4. COHEN, W. M., Levinthal, D. A. (1990), Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35: 128-152.
5. DE SOLLA PRICE, D. (1965), Is technology historically independent of Science? A study in statistical historiography. Journal of Technology and Culture, 6: 553-568.
6. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (1997), Introduction to special issue on science policy dimensions of the Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 24: 2-5.
7. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (1998), The endless transition: A Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Minerva, 36: 203-208.
8. ETZKOWITZ, H., LEYDESDORFF, L. (2000), The dynamics of innovation: from National Systems and Mode 2 to a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy, 29: 109-123.
9. GRUPP, H., SCHMOCH, U. (1992), Perception of scientification of innovation as measured by referencing between patents and papers. In: H. GRUPP (Ed.) Dynamics of Science-Based Innovations, Springer Publishers, Berlin/Heidelberg, pp.73-128.
10. LEYDESDORFF, L., ETZKOWITZ, H. (1996), Emergence of a Triple Helix of university-industry-government relations. Science and Public Policy, 23 (5): 279-286.
11. LEYDESDORFF, L., ETZKOWITZ, H. (1998), Triple Helix of innovation: introduction. Science and Public Policy, 25 (6): 358-364.
12. MCCARTNEY, S. (1999), Eniac, the Triumphs and Tragedies of the Worlds First Computer. Berkley Books, New York.
13. MCCULLOCH, R. (1980), International indicators of science and technology how does the US compare? Scientometrics, 2: 355-367.
14. MEYER, M. (2000a), Patent citations in a novel field of technology - What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology. Scientometrics, 48: 151-178.
15. MEYER, M. (2000b), Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy, 29: 409-434.
16. MEYER-KRAHMER, F., SCHMOCH, U. (1998), Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy, 27: 835-851.
17. MOWERY, D. C., SIMCOE, T. (2002), Is the internet a US invention? an economic and technological history of computer networking. Research Policy, 31: 1369-1389.
18. NARIN, F., NOMA, E. (1985), Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics, 7: 369-381.
19. NARIN, F., OLIVASTRO, D. (1992), Status report: Linkage between technology and science. Research Policy, 21: 237-249.
20. NARIN, F., OLIVASTRO, D. (1998), Linkage between patents and papers: an interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics, 41: 51-59.
21. NARIN, F., HAMILTON, K., OLIVASTRO, D. (1997), The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy, 26: 317-330.
22. OECD (1994), The Measurement of Scientific and Technological Activities: Using Patent Data as Science and Technology Indicators. Patent Manual 1994, Paris.
23. PORTER, M. (1995), The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York, The Free Press.
24. RIP, A. (1992), Science and technology as dancing partners. In: KROES, A., BAKKER, M. (Eds.) Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age. Kluwer Publications.
25. SCHMOCH, U. (1993), Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics, 26: 193-211.
26. SCHMOCH, U. (1997), Indicators and the relations between Science and Technology. Scientometrics, 38: 103-116.
27. SCHÖN, D. (1963), Invention and the Evolution of Ideas The Displacement of Concepts. Tavistock Publications.
28. SOETE, L. G., WYATT, S. M. E. (1983), The Use of Foreign Patenting as an Internationally Comparable Science and Technology Output Indicator. Scientometrics, 5: 31-54.
29. VAN VIAENEN, B., MOED, H., VAN RAAN, A. (1990), An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy, 19: 61-81.
30. VERBEEK, A., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., ANDRIES, P., ZIMMERMANN, E., DELEUS, F. (2002a), Linking science to technology: Using bibliographic references in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics, 54: 399-420.
31. VERBEEK, A., CALLAERT, J., ANDRIES, P., DEBACKERE, K., LUWEL, M., VEUGELERS, R. (2002b), Science and Technology Interplay - A Modelling Approach on a Regional Level. Final Report to the EC DG Research, Brussels (also forthcoming in the EC Indicators report 2003).