Science-technology flows in Spanish regions: An analysis of scientific citations in patents

Research Policy

Volumn 32, Issue 10, 2003, Pages 1783-1803

  Acosta, Manuel ^a   Coronado, Daniel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CÁDIZ   (Spain)

Author keywords

NPC methodology regional R D planning; Patents; Science technology flows; Scientific citations

Indexed keywords

INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS; PATENTS AND INVENTIONS; PLANNING; RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT MANAGEMENT;

ECONOMIC GROWTH;

INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH;

EID: 0345356390     PISSN: 00487333     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00064-7     Document Type: Article

References (85)

1. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z.J. Local geographic spillovers between university research and high technology innovations. Journal of Urban Economics. 42:1997;422-448.
2. Anselin L., Varga A., Acs Z.J. Geographic and sectoral characteristics of academic knowledge externalities. Papers of Regional Science. 79:2000;435-443.
3. Asheim B.T. Industrial districts as "learning regions" European Planning Studies. 4:1996;379-400.
4. Aydalot, P., Keeble, D. (Eds.), 1988. High Technology Industry and Innovative Environments: The European Experience. Routledge, London.
5. Beise M., Stahl H. Public research and industrial innovation in Germany. Research Policy. 28:1999;397-422.
6. Bell M., Pavitt K. Technological accumulation and industrial growth: contrasts between developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change. 2(2):1993;56-60.
7. Braczyk, H.J., Cooke, P., Heidenreich, M., 1998. Regional Innovation Systems. The Role of Governances in a Globalized World. UCL Press, London.
8. Camagni, R. (Ed.), 1991. Innovation Networks. Belhaven, London.
9. Carpenter M.P., Narin F. Validation study: patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence. World Patent Information. 5:1983;180-185.
10. Carpenter M.P., Cooper M., Narin F. Linkage between basic research and patents. Research Management. 23:1980;30-35.
11. Castells, M., Hall, P., 1994. Technopoles of the World: The Making of Twenty-first Century Industrial Complexes. Routledge, London.
12. Collins P., Wyatt S. Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy. 17:1988;65-77.
13. Cooke P. Regions in a global market: the experiences of Wales and Baden-Württemberg. Review of International Political Economy. 4:1997;348-379.
14. Cooke P., Schienstock G. Structural competitiveness and learning regions. Enterprise and Innovation Management Studies. 1(3):2000;265-280.
15. Cooke, P., Boekholt, P., Tödtling, F., 1998. Regional innovation systems: designing for the future. Final Report to the European Commission, DG XII. Centre for Advanced Studies in Social Sciences, Cardiff.
16. Cozzens, S., Healey, P., Rip, A., Ziman, J. (Eds.), 1990. The Research Systems in Transition. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston.
17. Dosi, G., Freeman, C., Nelson, R., Silverberg, G., Soete, L. (Eds.), 1988. Technical Change and Economic Theory. Pinter, London.
18. Etzkowitz, H., Leydesdorff, L. (Eds.), 1997. Universities in the Global Economy: A Triple Helix of University-Industry-Government Relations. Cassell Academic, London.
19. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. The dynamics of innovation: from national systems and mode 2 to a triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Research Policy. 29:2000;109-123.
20. Freeman, C. (Ed.), 1990. The Economics of Innovation. Elgar, London.
21. Freeman, C., 1994. The economics of technical change: critical survey. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 18.
22. Fung M.K., Chow W.W. Measuring the intensity of knowledge flow with patent statistics. Economic Letters. 74:2002;353-358.
23. Godin B. Research and the practice of publication in industries. Research Policy. 25:1996;587-606.
24. Griliches, Z., 1995. R&D and productivity. In: Stoneman, P. (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial Innovation. Blackwell, London, pp. 52-89.
25. Grupp, H., Schmoch, U., 1992. Perception of scientification as measured by referencing between patents and papers, In: Grupp, H. (Ed.), Dynamics of Science-Based Innovation. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 73-128.
26. Hicks, D., Katz, J.S., 1997. The British Industrial Research System. SPRU Working Paper, University of Sussex, Brighton, UK.
27. Iversen, E.J., 1999. A patent share and citation analysis of knowledge bases and interactions in the Norwegian innovation system. STEP Working Paper A-07, Oslo.
28. Jaffe A., Trajtenberg M. International knowledge flows: evidence from patent citations. Economic of Innovation and New Technology. 8:1999;105-136.
29. Jaffe A., Henderson R., Trajtenberg M. Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 108:1993;577-598.
30. Klevorick A.K., Levin R., Nelson R., Winter S. On the sources and significance of inter-industry differences in technological opportunities. Research Policy. 24:1995;342-349.
31. Krugman, P., 1992. Technology and international competition: a historical perspective. In: Harris, M.C., Moore, G.E. (Eds.), Linking Trade and Technology Policies. National Academy Press, Washington, pp. 13-28.
32. Krugman, P., 1995. Development, Geography and Economic Theory. MIT Press, Cambridge.
33. Lawson, C., 1999. Towards a competence theory of the region. Cambridge Journal of Economics 23, 151-166.
34. Lawson C., Lorenz E. Collective learning, tacit knowledge and regional innovative capacity. Regional Studies. 33(4):1999;305-317.
35. Leydesdorff L. The Triple Helix: an evolutionary model of innovation. Research Policy. 29:2000;243-255.
36. Lundvall, B.A. (Ed.), 1992. National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive learning. Pinter, London.
37. Lundvall, B.A., Borrás, S., 1997. The globalising learning economy: implications for innovation policy. Targeted Socio-Economic Research (TSER) program. European Commission (DG XII).
38. Lundvall B.A., Johnson B. The learning economy. Journal of Industrial Studies. 1(29):1994;23-42.
39. Maillat, D., 1991. The innovation process and the role of the milieu. In: Bergman, E., Maier, G., Todtling, F. (Eds.), Regions Reconsidered. Economic Networks, Innovation and Local Development in Industrialized Countries. Mansell, London, pp. 103-118.
40. Maillat D. Interactions between urban systems and localized productive systems: an approach to endogenous regional development in terms of innovative milieu. European Planning Studies. 6(2):1998;117-130.
41. Malecki, E.J., 1997. Technology and Economic Development. The Dynamics of Local, Regional and National Competitiveness. Longman, New York.
42. Mansfield E. Academic research and innovation. Research Policy. 20:1991;1-12.
43. Mansfield E. Academic research and industrial innovation: an update of empirical findings. Research Policy. 26:1998;773-776.
44. Mansfield E., Lee J.Y. The modern university: contributor to industrial innovation and recipient of industrial R&D support. Research Policy. 25:1996;1047-1058.
45. Markusen, A.R., Hall, P., Glasmeier, A., 1986. High Tech America: The What, How, Where and Why of the Sunrise Industries. Allen and Unwin, Boston.
46. Martin, B., Salter, A., Hicks, D., Pavitt, K., Senker, J., Sharp, M., Von Tunzelmann, N., 1996. The relationship between publicly funded basic research and economic performance: a SPRU review. HM Treasury, London.
47. McMillan G.S., Narin F., Deeds D.L. An analysis of the critical role of public science in innovation: the case of biotechnology. Research Policy. 29:2000;1-8.
48. Meyer M. Does science push technology? Patents citing scientific literature. Research Policy. 29:2000a;409-434.
49. Meyer M. What is special about patent citations? Differences between scientific and patent citations. Scientometrics. 49(1):2000b;93-123.
50. Meyer M. Patent citations in a novel field of technology. What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology? Scientometrics. 48(2):2000c;151-178.
51. Meyer M. Tracing knowledge flows in innovation systems. Scientometrics. 54(2):2002;193-212.
52. Meyer-Krahmer F., Schmoch U. Science-based technologies: university-industry interactions in four fields. Research Policy. 27:1998;835-851.
53. Morgan, K., 1997. The learning region: institutions, innovation and regional renewal. Regional Studies 31 (5), 491, 503.
54. Narin F., Noma E. Is technology becoming science? Scientometrics. 7:1985;369-381.
55. Narin F., Olivastro D. Status report: linkage between technology and science. Research Policy. 21:1992;237-249.
56. Narin F., Olivastro D. Linkage between patents and papers: an interim EPO/US comparison. Scientometrics. 41:1998;51-59.
57. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., Olivastro D. Linkage between agency supported research and patented industrial technology. Research Evaluation. 5:1995;183-187.
58. Narin F., Hamilton K.S., Olivastro D. The increasing linkage between US technology and public science. Research Policy. 26:1997;317-330.
59. Nelson, R. (Ed.), 1993. National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
60. Nelson, R.R., Winter, S., 1982. An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
61. Nelson, R.R., Wolff, E.N., 1997. Factors behind cross-industry differences in technological progress. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 8.
62. Noyons E.C.M., Van Raan A.F.J., Grupp H., Schmoch U. Exploring the science and technology interface: inventor-author relations in laser medicine research. Research Policy. 23:1994;443-457.
63. Paci R., Usai S. Technological enclaves and industrial districts: an analysis of the regional distribution of innovative activity in Europe. Regional Studies. 34(2):2000;97-114.
64. Pavit K. The social shaping of the national science base. Research Policy. 27:1998;793-805.
65. Porter, M., 1990. The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Free Press, New York.
66. Ratti, R., Bramanti, A., Gordon, R. (Eds.), 1997. The Dynamics of Innovative Regions. The GREMI Approach. Ashgate, Aldershot.
67. Salter A.J., Martin B.R. The economic benefits of publicly funded basic research: a critical review. Research Policy. 30:2001;209-532.
68. Saxenian, A., 1994. Regional Advantage: Culture and Competition in Silicon Valley and Route vol. 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge.
69. Schartinger D., Rammer C., Fischer M.M., Fröhlich J. Knowledge interactions between universities and industry in Austria: sectoral patterns and determinants. Research Policy. 31:2002;303-328.
70. Schmoch U. Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators. Scientometrics. 26(1):1993;193-211.
71. Simmie, J. (Ed.), 1997. Innovation, Networks and Learning Regions. Jessica Kingsley, London.
72. Sternberg R., Tamásy C. Munich in Germany's no. 1 high technology region: empirical evidence, theoretical explanations and the role of small firm/large firm relationships. Regional Studies. 33(4):1999;367-377.
73. Storper M. The limits to globalization: technology districts and international trade. Economic Geography. 68:1992;60-93.
74. Storper M. Regional "worlds" of production: learning and innovation in the technology districts of France, Italy and the USA. Regional Studies. 27:1993;433-455.
75. Storper M. The resurgence of regional economies, ten years later: the region as nexus of untraded interdependencies. European Urban & Regional Studies. 2:1995;191-221.
76. Storper, M., 1997. The Regional World. Territorial Development in a Global Economy. The Guilford Press, New York.
77. Stolpe M. Determinants of knowledge diffusion as evidenced in patent data: the case of liquid crystal display technology. Research Policy. 31:2002;1181-1198.
78. Tijssen R.J.W. Global and domestic utilization of industrial relevant science: patent citation analysis of science-technology interactions and knowledge flows. Research Policy. 30:2001;35-54.
79. Tijssen R.J.W. Science dependence of technologies: evidence from inventions and their inventors. Research Policy. 31:2002;509-526.
80. Tijssen R.J.W., Buter R.K., Van Leeuwen T.N. Technological relevance of science: an assessment of citation linkages between patents and research papers. Scientometrics. 47(2):2000;389-412.
81. Van Vianen B.G., Moed H.F., Van Raan A.F.J. An exploration of the science base of recent technology. Research Policy. 19:1990;61-81.
82. Varga, A., 1998. University research and regional innovation: a spatial econometric analysis of academic technology transfers. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht.
83. Verbeek A., Debackere K., Luwel M., Andres P., Zimmermann E., Deleus F. Linking science to technology: using bibliographic reference in patents to build linkage schemes. Scientometrics. 54(3):2002;339-420.
84. Wever E., Stam E. Cluster of high technology SMEs: the Dutch case. Regional Studies. 33(4):1999;391-400.
85. Ziman, J., 1994. Prometheus Bound: Science in a Dynamic Steady State. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.