Patent citations in a novel field of technology - What can they tell about interactions between emerging communities of science and technology?

Scientometrics

Volumn 48, Issue 2, 2000, Pages 151-178

  Meyer, Martin ^a,b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SUSSEX   (United Kingdom)

^b Technopolis Group Austria   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 0038533865     PISSN: 01389130     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1005692621105     Document Type: Article

References (28)

1. M. MEYER, Commercializing Novel Technologies: Hurdles on the Way to Growth. Institute of Strategy and International Business, Helsinki University of Technology, Espoo, 2000.
2. F. LAYTON, Technology as knowledge. Technology and Culture, 15 (1988) 31-41.
3. M. P. CARPENTER, F. NARIN, Validation study: Patent citations as indicators of science and foreign dependence. World Patent Information, 5 (1983) 180-185.
4. D. DE SOLLA PRICE , Is technology historically independent of science? Technology and Culture, 6 (1965) 553-568.
5. I. MALSCH, Nanotechnology in Europe: Experts' Perceptions and Scientific Relations between Sub-areas. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, 1997.
6. A. FRANKS, Nanotechnology, J. Phys E: Sci. Instrum., 20 (1987) 1442-1451.
7. D.W. BUDWORTH, Overview of Activities on Nanotechnology and Related Technology. Institute for Prospective Technological Studies, Seville, 1996.
8. BMBF, Delphi-Bericht 1995 zur Entwicklung von Wissenschaft und Technik - Mini-Delphi. Bonn, 1996.
9. T. BRAUN, A. SCHUBERT, S. ZSINDELY, Nanoscience and nanotechnology on the balance, Scientometrics, 38 (1999) 321-325.
10. M. MEYER, O. PERSSON, Nanotechnology - interdisciplinarity, patterns of collaboration and differences in application, Scientometrics, 42 (1998) 195-205.
11. F. NARIN, Patent bibliometrics. Scientometrics, 30 (1994) 150.
12. F. NARIN, K.S. HAMILTON, D. OLIVASTRO, The increasing linkage between U.S. technology and public science, Research Policy, 26 (1997) 318.
13. F. MEYER-KRAHMER, U. SCHMOCH, Chemistry, Information Technology, Biotechnology, and Production Technology: A Comparison of Linking Mechanisms in Four Fields. Fraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research: Karlsruhe, 1997.
14. A. RIP, Science and technology as dancing partners. In: P. KROES, M. BAKKER (Eds), Technological Development and Science in the Industrial Age, Kluwer, 1992, pp. 231-270.
15. M. MEYER, What is special about patent citations? Differences between patent and scientific citations. To be published in Scientometrics.
16. R. D. WALKER, Patents as Scientific and Technical Literature. The Scarecrow Press: Metuchen, NJ, and London, 1995.
17. DERWENT, Global Patent Sources: An Overview of International Patents, Edition 2, February 1999, Derwent Information, London, 35.
18. H. VAN DEN BELT, Action at a distance: A.W. Hofmann and the French patent disputes (1860-1863), or how a scientist may influence legal decisions without appearing in court. In: R. SMITH, B. WYNNE (Eds), Expert evidence: interpreting science in the law. Routledge: London, 1989.
19. B. CAMPBELL, Generalists, practitioners, and intellectuals: the credibility of experts in English patent law. In: R. SMITH, B. WYNNE (Eds), Expert Evidence: Interpreting Science in the Law. Routledge: London, 1989, pp. 210-236.
20. M. MEYER, What is special about patent citations, forthcoming, Scientometrics.
21. A. RIP, Mobilising resources through texts. In: M. CALLON, J. LAW, A. RIP (Eds), Mapping the Dynamics of Science and Technology. Macmillan: London, 1986, pp. 84-99.
22. P. COLLINS, S. WYATT, Citations in patents to the basic research literature. Research Policy, 17 (1988), 65-74.
23. U. SCHMOCH, Tracing the knowledge transfer from science to technology as reflected in patent indicators, Scientometrics, 26 (1993) 193-211.
24. R. BERTRAM, personal communication.
25. L. KARLSSON, personal communication.
26. NEUE PRESSE, 13.3.1999, Patentamt kommt Fleiss der Erfinder kaum nach.
27. R. S. CAMPBELL, A.L. NIEVES, Technology Indicators Based on Patent Data: The Case of Catalytic Converters - Phase I Report: Design and Demonstration. Batelle Pacific Northwest Laboratories, 1979.
28. M. MEYER, O. PERSSON, Tracing Knowledge Flows in a Novel Field of Technology: Inventiveness and Interaction between Nano-Science and Nano-Technology. Final report for Ruben Rausings Fond, SPRU, University of Sussex, Brighton, November1999.