Mate recognition in a freshwater fish: Geographical distance, genetic differentiation, and variation in female preference for local over foreign males

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 17, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 701-708

  Wong, B B M ^a   Keogh, J S ^a   Jennions, M D ^a  

^a AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

Author keywords

Mate choice; Mating preferences; Pacific blue eye; Phylogeography; Psudomugil signifer; Sexual selection; Speciation; Species recognition

Indexed keywords

FRESH WATER; MITOCHONDRIAL DNA;

MATE CHOICE; MATE RECOGNITION; PHYLOGEOGRAPHY; SEXUAL SELECTION; SPECIATION (BIOLOGY);

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DNA SEQUENCE; FEMALE; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; GEOGRAPHY; MALE; MORPHOMETRICS; PHYLOGENY; PHYSIOLOGY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR; SEXUAL DEVELOPMENT; SMEGMAMORPHA; STATISTICAL MODEL;

ANIMALS; AUSTRALIA; BODY WEIGHTS AND MEASURES; CLUSTER ANALYSIS; DNA, MITOCHONDRIAL; FEMALE; FRESH WATER; GEOGRAPHY; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MALE; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY; PRINCIPAL COMPONENT ANALYSIS; SEQUENCE ANALYSIS, DNA; SEX CHARACTERISTICS; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL; SMEGMAMORPHA; VARIATION (GENETICS);

ANIMALIA; NEMOPHILA; PSEUDOMUGIL; PSEUDOMUGIL SIGNIFER; PSEUDOMUGILIDAE; SMEGMAMORPHA;

EID: 0942273205     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1046/j.1420-9101.2003.00651.x     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Almeda, C. & Vistulo de Abreu, F. 2003. Dynamic instabilities lead to sympatric speciation. Evol. Ecol. Res. 5: 739-757.
2. Avise, J.C. 2000. Phylogeography: The History and Formation of Species. Havard University Press, Cambridge, MA, USA.
3. Barraclough, T.G. & Nee, S. 2001. Phylogenetics and speciation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 16: 391-399.
4. Basolo, A.L. 1995. Phylogenetic evidence for the role of a preexisting bias in sexual selection. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 259: 307-311.
5. Blomberg, S.P. & Garland, T. 2002. Tempo and mode in evolution: phylogenetic inertia, adaptation and comparative methods. J. Evol. Biol. 15: 899-910.
6. Boake, C.R.B. 2002. Sexual signaling and speciation, a micro-evolutionary perspective. Genetica. 116: 205-214.
7. Castellano, S., Giacoma, C. & Dujsebayeva, T. 2000. Morphometric and advertisement call geographic variation in polyploid green toads. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 70: 341-360.
8. Dagley, J.R., Butlin, R. & Hewitt, G.M. 1994. Divergence in morphology and mating signals, and assortative mating among populations of Chorthippus paralleus (Orthoptera: Acrididae). Evolution 48: 1202-1210.
9. Endler, J.A. & Houde, A.E. 1995. Geographic variation in female preferences for male traits in Poecilia reticulata. Evolution 49: 456-468.
10. Hadfield, A.J., Ivantsoff, V. & Johnston, P.G. 1979. Clinal variation in electrophoretic and morphological characters between two nominal species of the genus Pseudomugil (Pisces: Atheriniformes: Pseudomugilidae). Aust. J. Mar. Freshwater Res. 30: 375-386.
11. Herring, K. & Verrell, P.A. 1996. Sexual incompatabilities and geographical variation in mate recognition systems: tests in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Anim. Behav. 52: 279-287.
12. Hill, G.E. 1994. Geographic variation in male ornamentation and female preference in the house finch: a comparative test of models of sexual selection. Behav. Ecol. 5: 64-73.
13. Houde, A.E. & Hankes, M.A. 1997. Evolutionary mismatch of mating preferences and male colour patterns in guppies. Anim. Behav. 53: 343-351.
14. Jukes, T.H. & Cantor, C.R. 1969. Evolution of protein molecules. In: Mammalian Protein Metabolism (H. N. Munro, ed.), pp. 21-132. Academic Press, New York.
15. Keogh, J.S., Scott, I.A.W. & Scanlon, J. 2000. Molecular phylogeny of viviparous Australian elapid snakes: affinities of 'Echiopsis' atriceps (Storr, 1980) and 'Drysdalia' coronata (Schlegel, 1837), with description of a new genus. J. Zool., Lond. 252, 317-326.
16. Knight, M.E. & Turner, G.F. 1999. Reproductive isolation among closely related Lake Malawi cichlids: can males recognize conspecific females by visual cues? Anim. Behav. 58: 761-768.
17. de Kort, S.R. & ten Cate, C. 2001. Response to interspecific vocalisations is affected by degree of phylogenetic relatedness in Streptopelia doves. Anim. Behav. 61: 239-247.
18. Magurran, A.E., Paxton, C.G.M., Seghers, B.H., Shaw, P.H. & Carvalho, G.R. 1996. Genetic divergence, female choice and male mating success in Trinidadian guppies. Behaviour 133: 503-517.
19. Masta, S.E. & Maddison, W.P. 2002. Sexual selection driving diversification in jumping spiders. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99: 4442-4447.
20. McGlashan, D.J. & Hughes, J.M. 2002. Extensive genetic divergence among populations of the Australian freshwater fish, Pseudomugil signifer (Pseudomugilidae), at different hierarchical scales. Mar. Freshwater Res. 53: 1-11.
21. Meffert, L.M. & Regan, J.L. 2002. A test of speciation via sexual selection on female preferences. Anim. Behav. 64: 955-965.
22. Mendelson, T.C. & Shaw, K.L. 2002. Genetic and behavioral components of the cryptic species boundary between Laupala cerasina and L. kohalensis (Orthoptera: Gryllidae). Genetica. 116: 301-310.
23. Panhuis, T.M., Butlin, R., Zuk, M. & Tregenza, T. 2001. Sexual selection and speciation. Trends Ecol. Evol. 16: 364-371.
24. Pfennig, K.S. 1998. The evolution of mate choice and the potential conflict between species and mate-quality recognition. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B. 265: 1743-1748.
25. Pfennig, K.S. 2000. Female spadefoot toads compromise on mate quality to ensure conspecific matings. Behav. Ecol. 11: 220-227.
26. Pillay, N. 2000. Female mate preference and reproductive isolation in populations of the striped mouse Rhabdomys pumilio. Behaviour 137: 1431-1441.
27. Pillay, N., Willan K. & Meester, J. 1995. Evidence of pre-mating reproductive isolation in two allopatric populations of the vlei rat (Otomys irroratus). Ethology 100: 61-71.
28. Ptacek, M. 2000. The role of mating preferences in shaping interspecific divergence in mating signals in vertebrates. Behav. Proc. 51: 111-134.
29. Ptacek, M.B. & Travis, J. 1997. Mate choice in the Sailfin Molly, Poecilia latipinna. Evolution 51: 1217-1231.
30. Reusch, T.B.H., Wegner, K.M. & Kalbe, M. 2001. Rapid genetic divergence in postglacial populations of threespine stickleback (Gasterosteus aculeatus): the role of habitat type, drainage and geographical proximity. Mol. Ecol. 10: 2435-2445.
31. Rolan-Alvarez, E., Erlandsson, J., Johnannesson, K. & Cruz, R. 1999. Mechanisms of incomplete prezygotic reproductive isolation in an intertidal snail: testing behavioural models in wild populations. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 879-890.
32. Rupp, J.C. & Woolhouse, M.E.J. 1999. Impact of geographical origin on mating behaviour in two species of Biomphalaria (Planorbidae: Gastropoda). Anim. Behav. 58: 1247-1251.
33. Ryan, M.J. & Rand, A.S. 1990. The sensory basis of sexual selection for complex calls in the tungara frog, Physalaemus pustulosus (sexual selection for sensory exploitation). Evolution 44: 305-314.
34. Semple, G. 1986. Pseudomugil signifer - maintenance, reproduction and early development of the Pacific blue-eye. Fishes of Sahul 3: 121-125.
35. Shaw, K.L. 2000. Interspecific genetics of mate recognition: inheritance of female acoustic preference in Hawaiian crickets. Evolution 54: 1303-1312.
36. Simmons, L.W., Zuk, M. & Rotenberry, J.T. 2001. Geographic variation in female preference functions and male songs of the field cricket Teleogryllus oceanicus. Evolution 55: 1386-1394.
37. Strecker, U. & Kodric-Brown, A. 1999. Mate recognition systems in a species flock of Mexican pupfish. J. Evol. Biol. 12: 927-935.
38. Swofford, D.L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (*and Other Methods), Version 4. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA, USA.
39. Tilley, S.G., Verrell, P.A. & Arnold, S.J. 1990. Correspondence between sexual isolation and allozyme differentiation: a test in the salamander Desmognathus ochrophaeus. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 87: 2715-2719.
40. Tregenza, T., Pritchard, V.L. & Butlin, R. 2000. The origins of premating reproductive isolation: testing hypotheses in the grasshopper Chorthippus paralleus. Evolution 54: 1687-1698.
41. Wiens, J.J., Reeder, T.W. & De Oca, A.N.M. 1999. Molecular phylogenetics and evolution of sexual dichromatism among populations of the Yarrow's spiny lizard (Sceloporus jarrovii). Evolution 53: 1884-1897.
42. Wong, B.B.M. in press. Superior fighters make mediocre fathers in the Pacific blue eye fish. Anim. Behav.
43. Wong, B. & Jennions, M.D. 2003. Costs influence male mate choice in a freshwater fish. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B (Suppl.), Biol. Lett. 270: 36-39.
44. Wong, B.B.M., Keogh, J.S. & McGlashan, D.J. 2004. Current and historical patterns of drainage connectivity in eastern Australia inferred from genetic structuring in a widespread freshwater fish. Pseudomugil signifer (Pseudomugilidae) Mol. Ecol. 13: 391-401.