Sexy sons from re-mating do not recoup the direct costs of harmful male interactions in the Drosophila melanogaster laboratory model system

Journal of Evolutionary Biology

Volumn 18, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 1315-1323

  Orteiza, N ^a   Linder, J E ^a   Rice, W R ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Interlocus conflict; Interlocus contest evolution; Sexual conflict; Sexually antagonistic co evolution

Indexed keywords

EVOLUTION;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONFLICT; DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; GENETIC SELECTION; GENETICS; MALE; PHYSIOLOGY; SEXUAL BEHAVIOR;

ANIMALS; CONFLICT (PSYCHOLOGY); DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER; EVOLUTION; FERTILITY; MALE; SELECTION (GENETICS); SEXUAL BEHAVIOR, ANIMAL;

DROSOPHILA MELANOGASTER;

EID: 27144455070     PISSN: 1010061X     EISSN: 14209101     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1420-9101.2005.00923.x     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Andersson, M. 1994. Sexual Selection. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ.
2. Andres, J.A. & Morrow, E.H. 2003. The origin of interlocus sexual conflict: is sex-linkage important? J. Evol. Biol. 16: 219.
3. Arnqvist, G. 1989. Multiple mating in a water strider: mutual benefits or intersexual conflict? Anim. Behav. 38: 749-756.
4. Arnqvist, G. 1992. Pre-copulatory fighting in a water strider - inter-sexual conflict or mate assessment. Anim. Behav. 43: 559.
5. Brown, W.D., Bjork, A.D., Schneider, K. & Pitnick, S. 2004. No evidence that polyandry benefits females in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 58: 1242-1250.
6. Burpee, D.M. & Sakaluk, S.K. 1993. Repeated matings offset costs of reproduction in female crickets. Evol. Ecol. 7: 240-250.
7. Chapman, T., Hutchings, J. & Partridge, L. 1993. No reduction in the cost of mating for Drosophila melanogaster females mating with spermless males. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 253: 211-217.
8. Chapman, T., Liddle, L.F., Kalb, J.M., Wolfner, M.F. & Partridge, L. 1995. Cost of mating in Drosophila melanogaster females is mediated by male accessory gland products. Nature 373: 241-244.
9. Chapman, T., Trivett, S. & Partridge, L. 1994. Remating and male-derived nutrients in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Evol. Biol. 7: 51-69.
10. Chippindale, A.K., Gibson, J.R. & Rice, W.R. 2001. Negative genetic correlation for adult fitness between sexes reveals ontogenetic conflict in Drosophila. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 98: 1671-1675.
11. Civetta, A. & Clark, A.G. 2000. Correlated effects of sperm competition and postmating female mortality. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 97: 13162-13165.
12. Cohet, Y.A. & David, J.R. 1976. Deleterious effects of copulation in Drosophila females as a function of growth temperature of both sexes. Experientia 32: 696-697.
13. Cordero, C. & Eberhard, W.G. 2003. Female choice of sexually antagonistic male adaptations: a crucial review of some current research. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 1-6.
14. Crudgington, H.S. & Siva-Jothy, M.T. 2000. Genital damage, kicking and early death. Nature 407: 855-856.
15. Dean, J.M. 1981. The relationship between lifespan and reproduction in the grasshopper melanoplus. Oecologia 49: 385-388.
16. Fowler, K. & Partridge, L. 1989. A cost of mating in female fruit flies. Nature 338: 760-761.
17. Friberg, U. & Arnqvist, G. 2003. Fitness effects of female mate choice: preferred males are detrimental for Drosophila melanogaster females. J. Evol. Biol. 16: 797-811.
18. Gibson, J.R., Chippindale, A.K. & Rice, W.R. 2002. The X is a hot spot for sexually antagonistic fitness variation. Proc. Roy. Soc. B 269: 499-504.
19. Holland, B. 2002. Sexual selection fails to promote adaptation to a new environment. Evolution 56: 721-730.
20. Holland, B. & Rice, W.R. 1999. Experimental removal of sexual selection reverses intersexual antagonistic co-evolution and removes a reproductive load. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96: 5083-5088.
21. Houle, D. 1992. Comparing evolvability and variability of quantitative traits. Genetics 130: 195-204.
22. Kasule, F.K. 1986. Repetitive mating and female fitness in Dysdercus cardinalis (Hemiptera, Pyrrhocoridae). Zoo. J. Lennean Soc. 88: 191-199.
23. Lefevre, G. & Johnson, U.B. 1962. Sperm transfer, storage, displacement, and utilization in Drosophila melanogaster. Genetics 47: 1719-1736.
24. McKinney, F., Derrckson, S.R. & Mineau, P. 1983. Forced copulation in waterfowl. Behavior 86: 250-294.
25. Maynard Smith, J. 1976. What determines the rate of evolution? Am. Nat. 110: 331-338.
26. Moore, A.J., Gowaty, P.A., Wallin, W.G. & Moore, P.J. 2001. Sexual conflict and the evolution of female mate choice and male social dominance. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 268: 517-533.
27. Parker, G.A. 1979. Sexual selection and sexual conflict. In: Sexual Selection and Reproductive Competition in Insects (M. S. Blum & N. A. Blum, eds), pp. 123-166. Academic press, New York.
28. Partridge, L. & Fowler, K. 1990. Nonmating costs of exposure to males in female Drosophila-melanogaster. J. Insect Physiol 36: 419-425.
29. Partridge, L., Green, A. & Fowler, K. 1987. Effects of egg-production and of exposure to males on female survival in Drosophila melanogaster. J. Insect Phsiol. 33: 745-749.
30. Pitnick, S. & Garcia-Gonzalez, F. 2002. Harm to females increase with male body size in Drosophila melanogaster. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. 269: 1821-1828.
31. Pitnick, S., Spicer, G.S. & Markow, T.A. 1997. Phylogenetic examination of female incorporation of ejaculate in Drosophila. Evolution 51: 833-845.
32. Prout, T. & Clark, A.G. 2000. Seminal fluid causes temporarily reduced egg hatch in previously mated females. Proc. R. Soc. B. 267: 201-203.
33. Pyle & Gromko 1978. Repeated mating by female drosophila-melanogaster - adaptive importance. Experientia 34: 449-450.
34. Rice, W.R. 1996. Sexually antagonistic male adaptation triggered by experimental arrest of female evolution. Nature 381: 232-234.
35. Rice, W. & Holland, B. 1997. The enemies within: intergenomic conflict, interlocus contest evolution (ICE) and the intraspecific red queen. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 41: 1-10.
36. Rice, W.R. & Chippindale, A.K. 2001. Sexual recombination and the power of natural selection. Science 294: 555-559.
37. Rowe, L., Arnqvist, G., Sih, A. & Krupa, J.J. 1994. Sexual conflict and the evolutionary ecology of mating patterns - water striders as a model system. Trends Ecol. Evol. 9: 289-293.
38. Sawby, R. & Hughes, K.A. 2001. Male genotype affects female longevity in Drosophila melanogaster. Evolution 55: 834-839.
39. Speith, H.T. 1952. Mating behavior within the genus Drosophila (Diptera). Bull. Am. Mus. Nat. Hist. 99: 395-474.
40. Trivers, R.L. 1972, Parental investment and sexual selection. In: Sexual Selection and the Decent of Man (B. Campbell, ed.), pp. 136-179. Heinemann, London.